|
|
Question has been removed.
~R@JEES#
|
|
|
|
|
10th kick applied.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where is it plagiarised from?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Not complete but partially from different sources, for e.g. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/ms171728(v=vs.100).aspx[^]
Quote: 1. Query the control's InvokeRequired property.
2. If InvokeRequired returns true, call Invoke with a delegate that makes the actual call to the control.
3. If InvokeRequired returns false, call the control directly.
In the following code example, this logic is implemented in a utility method called SetText.
A delegate type named SetTextDelegate encapsulates the SetText method.
When the TextBox control's InvokeRequired returns true, the SetText method creates an instance
of SetTextDelegate and calls the form's Invoke method.
This causes the SetText method to be called on the thread that created the TextBox control,
and in this thread context the Text property is set directly
Thanks
Do not forget to comment and rate the article if it helped you by any means.
|
|
|
|
|
See the comments on the 'article'...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah yes - the one Dave spotted yesterday...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Article with 17 reports and still there?
I am deleting it directly.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks
Do not forget to comment and rate the article if it helped you by any means.
|
|
|
|
|
I remember his face[^] from somewhen here (not so far away though). If I recall correctly that time was reported as "plagiarized".
Now you can add spam to the list. blog 1[^] and blog 2[^] spamming about another old friend of this forum.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: If I recall correctly that time was reported as "plagiarized".
Correct. Add links to its published versions also.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
Message gone, user: here[^]
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Born To Learn
|
|
|
|
|
|
that would be better into B&S
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Done.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, Chris
|
|
|
|
|
Well, why closed in first place?
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly"- SoMad
|
|
|
|
|
I have no idea. I think that someone report it as spamm/abuse account to get a revenge for His comments (for example).
|
|
|
|
|
Definitely not a spammer - but not too polite...
I checked his posts and found some not too nice posts. I believe abuse reports over time closed his account...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
|
~R@JEES#
|
|
|
|