|
|
|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you spot such, please don't respond to it - just report it here.
When you respond, Protectors can't delete the message and it means the spam lasts longer!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
sure
Thanks
Do not forget to comment and rate the article if it helped you by any means.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your wish is my command!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
He's still posting. Maybe a final cleanup after the account is gone.
|
|
|
|
|
ATM Search for messages is clean, user on 8
If there is some more after user nuked, drop a message. I'll clean the rest
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not just that but this is an answer on a 2 year old question!!!
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The user is still trying - I just deleted a second.
Kickin' time!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
OriginalGriff wrote: Kickin' time!
too late, user still alive, but kicking long started (9 atm)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
About the member I will wait for answer to your question, but the Tip... it is to be reported at least due to lack of formatting
It looks a lot as it would just have been copy+pasted from soemwhere of internet.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
It's just a copy of the blog with images still hosted there. So it would be a blog if he is the author.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As you say, everyone is entitled to an opinion. Equally, everyone's a critic!
I didn't look at them all, but I don't think we can kick him off for it. If the votes are spurious, then the automated systems will discard them anyway, and it may be that he just doesn't upvote.
My feeling is: it's not abuse - it's unpleasant, but it's allowed by the rules. I'd suggest a Chris ruling on this before a kicking is applied.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think he is abusive in general...He may had some harsh words and we should report them, but he also gave a few serious comments...
So - report the comments (and possibly tell the members how to behave) but do not report member at this point...We always can keep an eye on him...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
You don't know if he is rating anything low. All you can see are comments when voting 1 or 2. He might have also voted high without writing comments. Many of his other comments are OK and in most comments on low voting he explains his decision. I would not report him or his comments. If you don't like his voting, just vote on the comments.
|
|
|
|
|
Let's agree that there are circumstantial evidence that he is abusing the system by entirely downvoting articles, and when he does, it is always "1" which speaks for himself.
- Michael Haephrati מיכאל האפרתי
|
|
|
|
|
Why?
The range is 1 to 5 - and only 3 and below need a comment. I suspect most people use it as a binary scale: "1" or "5" - certainly most of my articles and tips attract a heck of a lot more of those any anything in the middle.
How often do you rate an article "2"? I don't think I ever have.
Personally, I generally only vote up (partly because my rep means downvotes are serious in terms of overall score and damage to reputation). But if I was to downvote, it would likely be "1" because I'm unlikely to vote "3" or "average", and not sure what would lead me to "2" or "slightly worse than average but not exactly complete rubbish".
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|