OT: re article "Interfacing with a Joystick using C#

den2k889-Dec-14 21:47

9-Dec-14 21:47

Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and Spammer[^]

Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]

~~Spam[^] and spammer[^]~~

Spam[^] and Spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]

Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]

Spam[^] and spammer[^]
spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]

Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]

It's not over yet...

GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*

modified 12-Dec-14 14:48pm.

all gone

Nelek10-Dec-14 21:29

Nelek

10-Dec-14 21:29

~~all of them are still alive, reports counters oscilating between 6 and 8~~
gone

M.D.V.

If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

modified 14-Dec-14 6:50am.

Spam hunting - Good morning part II

den2k889-Dec-14 21:35

den2k88

9-Dec-14 21:35

Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spamemr[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]

Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]

Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]

Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]

Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]

Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and Spammer[^]

Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]

GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*

Re: Spam hunting - Good morning part II

OriginalGriff9-Dec-14 21:45

OriginalGriff

9-Dec-14 21:45

Spam removed, users need more kicks.

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

all spammers gone

Nelek10-Dec-14 21:26

Nelek

10-Dec-14 21:26

all spammers gone

M.D.V.

Spam hunting - Good morning pat I

den2k889-Dec-14 21:26

den2k88

9-Dec-14 21:26

Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]

Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]

Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and Spammer[^]

Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]

Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]

Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and spammer[^]
Spam[^] and Spammer[^]

GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*

Re: Spam hunting - Good morning pat I

Nelek9-Dec-14 21:37

Nelek

9-Dec-14 21:37

All spam have been dealt with, messages doesn't exist anymore.

Users still all active (2 or 3 reports at the moment)

M.D.V.

OT: re article "Interfacing with a Joystick using C#

OriginalGriff10-Dec-14 10:18

OriginalGriff

10-Dec-14 10:18

Replying here as the article is deleted.

"I don't have anything here to check it out in detail, but there is a download in this article (if that is what you were meaning)"

He added the download - the first version was just the words.

"Altough I agree with you. This is just a thanks and a zip-file. Not enough for a tip and less for an article"

I'd agree - but it was posted as an "Alternative to..." Article, and while I don't like them (can't see the point as they don't stand alone, but you can't read them easily with the original) they are allowed to be just code, petty much as the main article covers the background.

Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...

Re: OT: re article "Interfacing with a Joystick using C#

Nelek10-Dec-14 12:11

Nelek

10-Dec-14 12:11

OriginalGriff wrote:
Replying here as the article is deleted.

Odd. Did he delete it himself?

OriginalGriff wrote:
(can't see the point as they don't stand alone, but you can't read them easily with the original)

Agree

OriginalGriff wrote:
they are allowed to be just code, petty much as the main article covers the background.

Didn't know that. I think it would be nice to have an update in the FAQ with some guidelines about what is allowed, sometimes is quite difficult to evaluate the quality of the contributions and if they are ok or to be reported.

M.D.V.

2 Users still alive - Not anymore

Nelek10-Dec-14 12:14

Nelek

10-Dec-14 12:14