|
The C# forum has only a single post with a single reply in it. (At least on Web03)
C# must not be that popular anymore?
|
|
|
|
|
I was refreshing the message cache, so there might have been a temporary shortage of knowledge for you to read. Should be a good now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I just wrote Public Public SMS Message Repository[^].
- Sometimes the uploaded images would disappear and I would have to reupload them (happened once).
- Sometimes the images were uploaded (I could see them in a browser using a direct link), but would not appear in the article. Their URI was the relative 996504/imagename.png; and I tried just imagename.png. As a workaround, I used the absolute URIs.
- My reputation points do not show the addition of an article.
|
|
|
|
|
My Article just got closed??? and i don't know what that means the notification gone by my click said "someone reported as ... " or something like that
Siavash B
|
|
|
|
|
When an article is closed, it means that it did not meet the standards. You can resolve it by reading the full closure comment (and optionally, comments the reviewers left), then edit your article so it complies with CodeProject's quality standards. Take a look at the Submission Guidelines: http://www.codeproject.com/info/Submit.aspx[^]
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
When I go to someone's profile, I get "Something bad happened".
[Edit]
... and as soon as I post this, everything works again
[Edit #2]
... and now it doesn't work anymore.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
modified 1-Jun-15 11:47am.
|
|
|
|
|
- Select 'New' tab -> Not a single question in list
- Remove Ignored filters -> Everything works as expected.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
All the blog posts on my professional profile from November 2014 to present are no longer appearing. That's six months worth of posts missing. Any ideas where they have gone? How can I get them back again?
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
modified 1-Jun-15 0:56am.
|
|
|
|
|
Dominic Burford wrote: Any ideas where they have gone?
Maybe they have been edited and recategorised as Articles.
Were they posted under this account or a different account? What's the blog URL for your blog feed?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris, they were posted under this account. It's the blog that appears on your professional page. I used it to post all my thoughts and musings on software development. Now the last seven months have disappeared.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ah - so you're talking about your personal blog postings on CodeProject, not Technical Blog articles of yours we've aggregated from an external blog. Gotcha.
<tappity, tappity>> All fixed.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Woo hoo awesome Chris. Many thanks
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Seeing perfectly genuine messages appearing in the spam moderation queue - including one from Kent in Insider News ... he's not that dodgy is he?
But loads of black magic appeared in QA a short while ago.
[Edit - just had to authorise this post as well ]
|
|
|
|
|
Yep - the spam filter is relearning. It should be good now, but if it traps messages then the best thing to do is approve them and move on. It'll learn
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Chris said: the best thing to do is approve them and move on Did my stint yesterday in UK timezone
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks mate
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
When making a search, deleted messages also show up if they match the search keywords. I believe this shouldn't happen.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
The list of available licenses is too short and doesn't cover a lot of cases:
- There are 3 varieties of BSD license: 4-clause (old), 3-clause (new), 2-clause (newest). Both 3-clause and 2-clause are widely used.
- There are more versions of MPL license, not just 1.1. Firefox is licensed under MPL 2.0, for example. It is also partially viral (it infects files), so the info is incorrect.
- Among Creative Commons license family, only CC-BY-SA-2.5, CC-BY-SA-3.0, CC-BY-3.0 and CC-BY-ND-3.0 are present. Why only these versions and varieties? The current version of CC family of licenses is 4.0.
- Among GPL license family, only LGPLv3 and GPLv3 are present. Where's AGPL? Where are older versions? Linux is licensed GPLv2 and it isn't changing anytime soon. AGPL may not have gained popularity, but several popular projects use it.
- All varities of "public domain" inspired licenses are not present, including CC0, Unlicense, WTFPL etc.
- A crazy number of licenses specific to languages and environments are missing, like PHP, Python etc.
Furthermore, article text and code can be covered by different licenses (for example, text under CC-BY, code under BSD) and both may be covered by multiple licenses (for example, some popular projects are dual-licensed GPL/commercial). The requirement to choose just one license from a very short list forces authors to provide incorrect and incomplete information.
Also, the "default license" CPOL isn't OSI approved, isn't FSF approved, isn't GPL compatible, but that's a different matter, which no one at Code Project seems to care about. Come on, is forbidding "immoral or improper" usage so much more important than compatibility with the rest of the world?
Overall, licensing functionality is badly broken.
I suggest adding a complete OSI list, at least. Ideally, I'd prefer being able to provide a custom license. Also, separate licenses for article text and code, as well as multi-licensing should be supported. Fixing CPOL would be nice too, but I don't believe it'll happen.
P.S. When I posted my article some time ago, the editor said that MLP 2.0 will be added. Well, two years later, still nothing has changed. Now I want to post an article licensed under CC-BY-4.0, with code licensed under WTFPL* (aka "public comain for jurisdictions disallowing public domain"), which in turn relies on third-paty code under MIT, BSD 3-clause "New" and BSD 2-clause "Simplified". I have no idea what on Earth I am supposed to choose in the license dropdown. I guess I can choose CC-something-3.0 for both the text and and the code, but it would be a lie.
“Today is the first day of the rest of your life.”
|
|
|
|
|
In April I posted a message here[^] and it got a reply, but both messages are gone now, probably due to the data move.
[Edit]
I noticed the same in some other restricted forums, like the Moderators' Forum and the Mentors' Forum. Some of the recent messages are gone.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
modified 31-May-15 6:22am.
|
|
|
|
|
Should be good now.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
It is fixed for the group I linked, but some messages are still lost in the Moderators' Forum and Mentors' Forum.
The quick brown ProgramFOX jumps right over the Lazy<Dog> .
|
|
|
|
|
Posted a message[^] to this article[^].
The author replied.
I just went to reply to his reply and it's all disappeared.
|
|
|
|
|
Lounge sticky post: I didn't delete it this time, honest!
Loads of QA questions and answers: The "unanswered" list goes
38 mins ago
1 hr ago
1 hr ago
2 hrs ago
3 days ago
20-Jan-15
... And the "New" list is similarly truncated.
Tell me you didn't use that spammer "packers and movers" company that keeps trying to advertise that they leave stuff behind?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|