|
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without ads there would be no Code Project.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
I understand.
It's just about "accepting this fact" and not sending adds as news.
|
|
|
|
|
We do tend to have a fairly Microsoft-centric crowd here, so we post the news we feel is most relevant to our audience. Yes, some of the site we link to have annoying ads (and it's not getting any better I'm afraid - it's a sad industry trend). However, if we cut out every news site that had ads then there'd be nothing to post.
We're always happy to have our readers send in their news items. How about you provide us some suggestions[^]?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
|
IIRC if you modified a message after 5 mins (modified) will be included in the subject header - this appears to have stopped happening - is this by design?
|
|
|
|
|
I believe if only a miniscule change is made, the modified tag will not appear.
I often have to do minor touch ups on my posts due to typos.
I could be wrong though!
Adding some more lines here now, just for the sake of the return of the modified subject modifier.
How much will one have to change or add, I don't really know, but I hope this change here was enough!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
modified 5-Aug-15 6:44am.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems I'm right. Changed "on" to "not" after 17 minutes and no modified tag was added to the subject.
Cheers!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I'll be effworded.
That bigger change I made did not bring back the modified subject line modifier.
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly, which is why I brought it here.
|
|
|
|
|
Look at Chris' answer - They removed it by design.
|
|
|
|
|
Well thanks so much for reminding me to keep a watch on the threads I posted to.
To keep in line with the CCC I posted today: "Oh gosh I'm so grateful, I really needed that."
Mange tak for ingenting!
"I had the right to remain silent, but I didn't have the ability!"
Ron White, Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
There was a suggestion that adding "Modified" to the title was redundant and annoying. The message body itself contains an indication as to whether the message was modified.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I have posted some questions about asp.net mvc and it is related to MS 70 486 exam. I 'm a junior developer with experience in C# and asp.net (don't experience exp in ASP.net MVC).my company want me to that exam with in a month.this is the only place i know about people who have very good knowledge in programming.so that is why asked a help from them to find some answers.they closed my thread some said "this is not the place to do your home work" and so on.
i know the answers but im not sure about them.because i don't have a good knowledge in mvc and i was unable to find answers through internet so i have nothing to do no place to get a help. that is why i decided to post in code project.
i suggest to open another section for certification.That will help for beginners.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Thumbrule : Post questions according to the guidelines and it won't get closed e.g. You know the answer but you are not sure about it. You asked the question how to do...which does...please help me. There are very less chance that someone will be providing you the reasonable answer and it will be closed within hours.
Further, Certification requires a very good command over specific technology regardless of which Certification it is.
Programmer : A machine that converts coffee into code !
|
|
|
|
|
I know the question you mean: Help me to find answers[^] - it was me that told you we don;t do your homework.
And when you post a list of homework questions and nothing else at all except a subject "Help me to find answers" you have to expect that we will treat it as your homework - because let's be honest, that's exactly what it is. And we don't do your homework, because it helps no one in the long run.
If you can't answer those questions with all the time and Google you need then you certainly aren't going to pass the exam when you have limited time, and no internet access...
I don't agree with it being closed as "spam or abuse", but that's another matter.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Please see the code sample in my answer, this one: How to update UI from other threads?[^].
The "ghost" tags "p", "div" and "pre" appeared inside the code sample (<pre>). Note that the tag "p" never appears in the source, it is inserted during submission, created from the end-of-line characters and then escaped. As to the other tags, "code" comes from outside of "pre"; and I didn't see unbalanced tags.
It looks like a regression bug to me; recently, it worked correctly.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Indeed, I also found this happening in one the articles that I was moderating yesterday but I thought it was something author has messed up with.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
OK, that's seriously annoying.
CommonMark is meant to fix the issues inherent in other Markdown implementation while being true to the core ideas of Markdown. However, if it can't even understand that when it's inside a PRE block it should not apply Markdown transformations (PRE means "preformatted", after all) then it's dead to me.
Disabling Markdown in QA and reverting back to MarkdownSharp.
This makes me sad.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Negative result is still much better than nothing.
Thank you for the answer and editing my post as well. I noticed another thing: < and > were escaped inside "pre" element, so it was rendered as < and > so I changed them back to actual angular bracket characters. (Your edition of my post left them as such.) Will it be this way since this moment of time? I mean, without using "encode" seen on the menu above…
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
How it is right now is how it will be for QA for the foreseeable future.
I am working on a Markdown parser (yeah, and I put bamboo slivers under my fingernails for fun, too) to provide us with a Markdown processor that's flexible, fast and allows control of odd Markdown decisions. It won't be ready for a number of weeks though.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you. If I may, my opinion: we need consistency much more than the advanced features. If we simply had exactly the same markup features in all posts, even comments, it would be the best. (Even if it required using original HTML. I understand that it would not cover syntax coloring, which could be done on top of it.)
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
What CommonMark parser did you use?
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|
|
I just looked at the CommonMark spec, and I agree, that is a very stupid decision.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
|
|
|
|