|
|
|
Gone, he met Sean Apollo Creed
|
|
|
|
|
large spam hammer 1 - spammer 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both gone
while (true) {
continue;
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
while (true) {
continue;
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
Geek code v 3.12 {
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- r++>+++ y+++*
Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
}
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
|
|
|
|
|
|
All gone!
How do we preserve the wisdom men will need,
when their violent passions are spent?
- The Lost Horizon
|
|
|
|
|
This: http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=183196&aid=1029420[^]
It just reads as a "puff" for the company rather than anything actually useful.
But...there is no company link (other than the user name) so I'm torn (hence no user link)
And the user has two other articles, which don't read as spam.
So: what do you think? Spam? Blog? Let it through? I'm not sure (except I'm sure it's not an article).
Comments? Ideas?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
(As you said) If it had links back to the company site, then yes it would definitely be spam.
However, the 'article' does contain more readable content that some, I'm not making comment on the value of the content
It has my vote for 'incorrect type' - i.e. I think it's a blog rather than an article.
|
|
|
|