|
You mean we're not supposed to open a bottle early Thursday afternoon?
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
No,
you are supposed to open it late Thursday morning, let it breath a bit and then drink it early Thursday afternoon
(disclamer: probably depends on what is in the bottle, and I have no clue if it's actually true or not but...)
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
|
This account[^] was closed for posting a plagiarised article[^].
The user has signed up again (Member 10510822[^]) to re-post the article[^]. He has a different user ID, but has kept his original reputation. The comments[^] from his old account are now associated with his new account, although the messages and QA contributions are not.
Is this a bug lurking deep in the bowels of the database?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
That happens when you sign-up using the same e-mail account.
|
|
|
|
|
Doesn't mean it's not a bug, though.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Agree. I think the e-mail should get banned (Thought it did)
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: Is this a bug lurking deep in the bowels of the database?
It's a symptom of us being too kind in the past.
Long story.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Before I took a break from CP some months ago there was a "formatting-styles box" whenever writing a message. Where did it go and why? Can I re-enable it somewhere?
Edit:
User Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0
CRC 4079364738
Edge False
Chrome False
Gecko True
IE False
Opera False
Safari False
Blink False
WebKit False
Browser Firefox
Platform Type Desktop
Standard True
Display Mode Normal
Version string 0.0
Version 0
Platform Win7
Platform Version 6.1
Editable Elements False
Mobile Device False
Small Mobile Device False
Touch Device False
Desktop True
Tablet False
Modern False
Semi-Modern False
Cookies OK? True
Server Web04
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
modified 13-Jan-16 9:29am.
|
|
|
|
|
There were some problems with the server-side browser detection a while back, but they all seem to have been fixed. Are you using a strange browser that's not on the list?
Chris will probably want to see the results of the Browser Check[^] page.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the link, Richard.
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
|
Try now
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Works! Thanks, Chris!
If the brain were so simple we could understand it, we would be so simple we couldn't. — Lyall Watson
|
|
|
|
|
Normally by now I should have the daily insider email (and mobile email) in my inbox but I haven't received it yet.
Something went wrong?
(starting to have withdrawal symptoms here )
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
The mailserver slept in today. It's been woken up and given coffee. Mail should arrive shortly.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Just got it, thanks
Tom
|
|
|
|
|
Message Removed
modified 13-Jan-16 12:00pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Have a look at this message in S&A: Spammer in moderation - CodeProject[^]
I've edited the link itself to remove the spam url, but if you look at the revision history, then the <a href=...> HTML was fine:
<a href="http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/ArticleVersion.aspx?waid=196527&aid=1070980"> in both the "current tab" and "new tab" versions, but the human readable text between the <a> and </a> was the original spam URL plus the "CodeProject" text - and in Chrome an attempt to follow the link to the article takes you to the spam page! Which is weird...
OK, that's not your bug, but we shouldn't be showing the url at all - that's what the spammers want!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Most pages fail to load at all, and some only load partially. Currently on Web04.
EDIT: Randomly fixed itself.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question?
The metaphorical solid rear-end expulsions have impacted the metaphorical motorized bladed rotating air movement mechanism.
Do questions with multiple question marks annoy you???
modified 11-Jan-16 8:42am.
|
|
|
|
|
All morning in Web03 - can't see any problem...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
I am currently in Web04 as well... I noticed nothing on my end.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: I noticed nothing on my end
That's a relief, better cancel that clinic appointment then.
modified 11-Jan-16 9:11am.
|
|
|
|
|
How to reproduce:
Your CodeProject Settings
I push "Browse.." button under the avatar, choose .png file, then "Save my Settings..", I get error screen:
Something bad happened
We're not sure what, but we have a few guesses.
Problem: Illegal characters in path.
Ticket: 0
Server: Web01
|
|
|
|
|
Sean on Gravatar[^]
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning
|
|
|
|