|
|
|
|
|
Member terminated; article was already gone.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terminated.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Or spam? Possibly both...
This: Go Programming Language: An Introductory Tutorial[^]
From this: Developer Evangelist - Professional Profile[^]
Is a copy of this: Learn Go Programming: A Tutorial with Code Examples | Toptal[^] - search both for "Meanwhile, Go takes a strong position on features that can lead to confusion and bugs. It omits OOP idioms such as inheritance and polymorphism, in favor of composition and simple interfaces. It downplays exception handling in favour of explicit errors in return values." and you'll see.
And that isn't the face of a guy called Brendon Hogger!
So it's probably plagiarised.
But...given the number of links to that site in the article, I suspect the poster also works for the company and has permission. Which would make it site driving spam, instead.
Me? I went the "Plagiarised" / "Abusive / Troll" combination, but you pays your money and you takes your choice!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
She works for Toptal. Spam.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
They are back, the first one today:
mrossi91802 - Professional Profile[^]
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 12-Nov-16 6:22am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All gone
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wiped off the face of the site.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACME group? The poster makes me think of Wile E. Coyote indeed...
DURA LEX, SED LEX
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|