|
KarstenK wrote: Getting organ donations is a hugh problem, because many people reject it. I am one of those who rejected being a donor. Actively rejected it, as the government decided that anyone is a donor by default. See, it's a deal that has no merit, no gain for me.
KarstenK wrote: So people waiting for a liver (like Steve Jobs ago) or other organs are on a long waiting list and this time in live danger. Even if Steve were still alive, and me dying - he would not be getting my liver for free, even if it were to save his life.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
|
|
|
|
|
You just need to find the people that know they are right and expect others to be wrong. "The intelligence of that creature known as a crowd is the square root of the number of people in it"
|
|
|
|
|
Normal crystals, likes diamond, are an atomic lattice that repeats in space, but physicists recently suggested making materials that repeat in time. Take two and it will be morning
|
|
|
|
|
they are the first of a large class of new materials that are intrinsically out of equilibrium, unable to settle down to the motionless equilibrium
You mean, like my mind?
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Stuff of TimeLords.
#SupportHeForShe
Government can give you nothing but what it takes from somebody else. A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you've got, including your freedom.-Ezra Taft Benson
You must accept 1 of 2 basic premises: Either we are alone in the universe or we are not alone. Either way, the implications are staggering!-Wernher von Braun
|
|
|
|
|
That explains the gout in my brain, then
«There is a spectrum, from "clearly desirable behaviour," to "possibly dodgy behavior that still makes some sense," to "clearly undesirable behavior." We try to make the latter into warnings or, better, errors. But stuff that is in the middle category you don’t want to restrict unless there is a clear way to work around it.» Eric Lippert, May 14, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Wouldn't that be fundamentally unbreakable? Every fracture in the material would be "overwritten" the successive instant. Basically it could allow the infamous "monomolecular blade".
But then, Physics and reality paths diverged a while ago
CALL APOGEE, SAY AARDWOLF
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
"Go ahead, make my day"
|
|
|
|
|
Professor You is quoted as saying: "Did anyone see where it went?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: Professor You is quoted as saying: "Did anyone see where when it went? FTFY
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
The reach and impact of open-source code vulnerabilities may only become known after they’re exploited—in some cases, long after—but, in one form or another, the business world has moved to community-developed software. Given enough eyeballs, more people will find bugs to exploit
|
|
|
|
|
While you’ve been able to uninstall certain Windows 10 apps since launch, as of October, Insiders have been able to delete apps such as Calculator, Groove Music, Mail and calendar, Movies & TV, OneNote, and Xbox, but that’s no longer the case. Because Calc is a required part of the OS
Maybe, it might just be a bug in a test version. But hey, slow news week.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems, some think Microsoft lawyers have too much free time at hand...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
the old versions of programs you could not uninstall was just a registry key change away.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Because Calc is a required part of the OS Yeah, how else is your computer going to convert to binary?
|
|
|
|
|
The matter will be corrected when the EU sues Microsoft. Again.
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
All your hard drive space are belong to us!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
They haven't disabled the delete key on the keyboard, so as long as I can find the folder on the hard drive...
Or have they removed the ability to take ownership of a folder?
|
|
|
|
|
Vark111 wrote: Or have they removed the ability to take ownership of a folder?
I'm sure that's next on their agenda. Certain folders will belong to Microsoft and you can't touch them.
The difficult we do right away...
...the impossible takes slightly longer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like to know if it's possible to (force) delete or rename your Windows folder.
Or make a shortcut to your bin folder and then move your actual bin to the bin through the shortcut.
I'm too afraid to try though
|
|
|
|
|
My first reading of your headline was that it referred to Stock market tracking apps and I thought; well, that's odd.
|
|
|
|
|
Known as the 'Composable Shell', or CSHELL, the company's efforts were said to be focused on establishing a universal Windows 10 version with a standardized framework to scale and adapt the OS to any type of device, display size or user experience, including smartphones, PCs, tablets, consoles, large touchscreens, and more. Irritation as a Service
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: a universal Windows 10 version with a standardized framework to scale and adapt the OS to any type of device, display size or user experience, including smartphones, PCs, tablets, consoles, large touchscreens, and more. Translation: "We're going to keep pushing people to use phone OSes on their PCs!"
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
O'Callahan's post criticizes antivirus vendors for a series of problems that he experienced first hand while working at Mozilla, but also through his interaction with other employees at other browser vendors. This post brought to you by Microsoft Defender: "generally competent"
|
|
|
|
|
Gmail currently restricts certain file attachments (e.g. .exe, .msc, and .bat) for security reasons, and starting on February 13, 2017, we will not allow .js file attachments as well. Is there any eligible reason to send a plain JavaScript file as mail attachment?
|
|
|
|
|
At least it will prevent bosses from asking for a modification to latest script.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|