|
|
Posting answer with suspicious link to a question solved 7 years ago:
Member 13023827 - Professional Profile[^] --- Post[^] which is an answer to this[^] question from January 2010.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
modified 26-Feb-17 18:54pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Smells like spam to me!
Get me coffee and no one gets hurt!
|
|
|
|
|
I have checked the tool's site and it is a free product, but the fact that the user name is exactly the same as the name of the page and the product, as well as his logo...
For me makes it susceptible to be reported
@Sean-ewington is that a partner product of CP? If yes, I think it will need a wipe of reports, if not... well it will be wiped out.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I looked at the article in moderation. I think it is thin.
I looked at their web site and although it looks fairly professional, I think the documentation section is weak - it has less information than the article in moderation. It always worries me when sites like that do not have a proper "Contact us" section with an office location containing street address and/or phone number.
As Nelek noted, it is a free product, except they apparently have an Enterprise version coming, which there is zero information about.
In the past week or so, I saw a post where someone was asking why articles about Visual Studio and the likes where accepted here at CP whereas Zontroy-type articles are dismissed as spam.
I have to admit it is something I have been pondering for quite a while and I have come to the conclusion that it is not easy to quantify. Instead it falls under the fuzzy rule "you know it when you see it".
Personally, I would not approve this article due to its lack of content, but I am not sure I will flag it as spam since it is not (yet) promoting a commercial product. However, my gut feeling is that the author cannot bring the article content to an acceptable level without digging into the features of the Enterprise edition, at which point it becomes blatant spam.
This concludes my two fuzzy cents.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like canned spam to me... how to connect a biometric device in asp.net[^]
Quote: [DELETED] biometric attendance machines provide the RESTful API support. You can very well integrate the reports with your web application. It supports registering the callback URL which gets called every time new attendance gets registered. If your application is web based, then you can very well attach the machine to your application directly. Refer the API details at [DELETED]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I removed the identifying bits from your post, since this will last longer than the spam will!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
Cool ... thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incompetent spammer - possibly the best kind - that hasn't sussed out how to do links yet, but he's trying hard: Mukesh Mali - Professional Profile[^]
We just aren't getting the quality of moronic spam we used to. I blame Pokemon Go, myself.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
modified 26-Feb-17 18:57pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gone
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|