|
(leans in to whisper) Reporting accounts would be small potatoes for rep farming. The big fish are the ones that report questions. (vanishes into smoke)
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
While that is true, it's not supposed to be like that - I strongly think that this forum also should be a place to discuss edge cases, and request assistance from the staff if it is needed.
|
|
|
|
|
Very much agreed.
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
|
|
|
|
|
RyanDev wrote: Unfortunately it does not matter. Too many people come to this forum, see a post, and start reporting without reading what you post. That's why the subject of the post is so important. I usually start such "question" or "debate" threads with "DO NOT REPORT -". If still missused, at least CP Staff can have a look and wipe the reports or give a slap between the ears to the "too quick fingers"
RyanDev wrote: Iroinically, I'm sure there are people who come to this forum simply to get rep points by reporting members. Quite probably. But not only here, a big part of the trash, fast answers, bad quality apportations and many other things is just to get rep.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I've emailed her. Let's see what she says. Maybe it was a whoopsy daisy.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, Sean. I've edited the OP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Find More .Net development tips at : .NET Tips
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incompetent spammer: Jatin Dabas - Professional Profile[^] - he gets the "Click here to learn more" bit, but fails to get his URL in ...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
gone
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do we really need solutions like this[^] from users like this[^] ?
Speed of sound - 1100 ft/sec
Speed of light - 186,000 mi/sec
Speed of stupid - instantaneous.
|
|
|
|
|
It's tricky to link to QA Answers because when it is gone, your link ends up pointing at the Question, not the Answer, which I believe is this[^] little gem.
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
Yes you are correct sir! That is actually the edited version.
Speed of sound - 1100 ft/sec
Speed of light - 186,000 mi/sec
Speed of stupid - instantaneous.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd add his comment as well: Comments by This Forum Sucks[^] - the first one which starts "oh and" is unneccessary.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|
He has received his final kick.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems this article C++ Runtime Crypter[^]
serves no purpose except to provide a means to beat antivirus programs.
from: Thesculptor - Professional Profile[^]
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
The solution could be used as an obfuscator, but it appears that the article writer's main purpose is to defeat anti-virus programs.
The question is - does CP want to allow articles that describe "dual-use" technology of this kind?
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
In my personal opinion it is better if the article remains as it caould serve as a basis for members to improve on detection of virus. Wether we like it or not these technologies will be explained and this knowledge will be shared - only it will be done on the less savory sites, where you are guaranteed that the members will only be interested in its malicious uses.
I like to think that here on CP (and in the world) there is mostly decent folk and while this knowledge could be used for malicious purposes this is a trait with all knowledge: an accomplishe mechanic can very well sabotage a car to kill a person, a good locksmith can definetely crack a lot of locks, a medic has the knownledge that enables him to kill and poison people without getting caught, a policeman has both the training and the weapons to make a fine robber and so on so forth.
* CALL APOGEE, SAY AARDWOLF
* GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
* Never pay more than 20 bucks for a computer game.
* I'm a puny punmaker.
|
|
|
|
|
It's a fair call. However my guess is that there are many more people searching the internet for how to create viruses than there are people looking for ways to create anti virus software. The article should in that case stick to the beneficial aspects of the technique and not mention evading anti virus software at all.
Peter Wasser
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts." - Bertrand Russell
|
|
|
|
|
Reopening a solved 2012 question to post his (irrelevant to the question) link: Marc Le Douarain - Professional Profile[^]
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
modified 6-Mar-17 15:07pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: The hamster grips his cold-steel beauty for the ultimate head-shot to another one of Black Bart's gang carrying a bag of bottled skin pills @donathanhutchingsgmailcom - The Lounge[^]
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
|
|
|
|
|