|
Holy sheet! It's official then - the Colecovision controller was better and made more sense than something Nintendo did.
|
|
|
|
|
A vigilante is putting a huge amount of work into infecting IoT devices | Ars Technica[^]
Quote: For now, the greyhat Hajime is outstripping the blackhat IoT botnets in features, robustness, and possibly even the number of infected devices. It wouldn't be surprising, however, if new blackhat versions catch up in the next year or two. I know there is a lot of potential for ethical discussion here, but one thing is totally clear for me beyond the question of "that's good or not", and is... manufacturers should start thinking a bit more about security and their users instead of only thinking on $$$
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: manufacturers should start thinking a bit more about security and their users instead of only thinking on $$$
... and, let's face it, users should start thinking a little more about their own security. If people are leaving their credentials as user=admin, password=blank, it's not entirely the manufacturer's fault when their devices get infected.
Slogans aren't solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
I totally agree with you on that.
But that could be half done by the manufacturer as well, asking for a password change in the first connection.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: asking for a password change in the first connection.
Yes, that would certainly be a good place to start!
Slogans aren't solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: asking for a password change in the first connection Tricky, because we're talking about connecting, not logging as admin.
If the device assumes that the first person to try to connect to the device is admin, it could cause problems.
Rather, the devices should be partially disabled until someone has logged in as admin and changed the password.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Mark_Wallace wrote: Rather, the devices should be partially disabled until someone has logged in as admin and changed the password. Even better, you are right
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Wrap the device tightly in at least two layers of aluminum foil, folds opposite for a better seal.
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
And don't forget to use the rest of the foil as a hat to avoid hijack of your brain
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
A commonly requested feature in .NET is the ability to use covariant return types. "When you want to go to it"
|
|
|
|
|
It's like multiple inheritance -- there are times when it is really useful. Covariant return types has been on my wish list for a long time!
Marc
Latest Article - Merkle Trees
Learning to code with python is like learning to swim with those little arm floaties. It gives you undeserved confidence and will eventually drown you. - DangerBunny
Artificial intelligence is the only remedy for natural stupidity. - CDP1802
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: It should be noted that most of the discussions about this feature happened in early 2015, over two years ago. And nothing has been done with it, at least publicly, since the proposal was formally written up back in February.
|
|
|
|
|
The ELO system, which most chess federations use today, ranks players by the results of their games. Although simple and efficient, it overlooks relevant criteria such as the quality of the moves players actually make. To overcome these limitations, Reseachers have now developed a new system. Oh great. Now the AIs have started trash-talking.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: AIs have started trash-talking Finally something useful!
... such stuff as dreams are made on
|
|
|
|
|
Is this approach any more valid than the numerous existing comparison systems?
I don't see how you can really factor in advances in chess theory let alone the advantages that modern players have from working with AIs and databases.
Is there any point doing so anyway? Depending on your age, you'll have your hero, whether it be Carlsen, Kasparov, Fischer or whoever. Trying to compare chess players across eras makes no more sense than arguing over whether Stanley Matthews was a better footballer than Lionel Messi when in many ways, they were competing in an entirely different sport.
Slogans aren't solutions.
|
|
|
|
|
So, a player who makes awesome moves, but always loses, could be ranked higher than a player who appears clueless, but wins?
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: ranks players by the results of their games I wasn't aware that there is any other options. After all it is a game and it is all about winning...
Skipper: We'll fix it.
Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this?
Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
|
|
|
|
|
The FCC will begin a process to repeal the agency's 2015 regulations in May. Are they switching to Chaotic?
I'll let you pick either Good or Evil.
|
|
|
|
|
Not a problem.
The world will just end up with an "american internet" and an "everyone else internet".
We've been living with that with the English language for so long that we'll just ignore the "american internet" like we do "american English".
Not a biggie, at all.
.. Unless you live in the US -- then you're ****ed.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Errr... the rules they look to change only began in 2015.
Can you remind me of the horrible mess that was the internet before 2015? I don't recall.
In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. ~ Ronald Reagan
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, because, before then, politicians hadn't got* involved in the "who owns the interwebs?" question.
It was ours, as in "the people's". They added rules so that they could later change them to "own" it.
* Aktcherley, this should be "gotten", because it's only american politicians who say they own the interwebs.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Actually its the big corporate telecoms who "own" the "interwebs" since they're the ones who built, continue to build, and maintain them.
In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. ~ Ronald Reagan
|
|
|
|
|
Fair enough, but they're rightly content to own (and rightly make a fortune from) the infrastructure.
I'm talking of the more ephemeral concept, not the wires and servers.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't the basis of net neutrality that ISP's and telecom giants can't provide faster service to those willing to pay (ie. Netflix, Amazon, Alibaba, etc...)? That all data needs to be treated equally?
That seems more infrastructure and less ephemeral to me.
While I can see both sides of the issue I wonder if our ever increasing nanny states won't take it to the next level where they make the same rules for individuals. Every home can and must get the same connection speed regardless of the occupants willingness / ability to pay. Every company can and must get the same connection speed...
In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. ~ Ronald Reagan
|
|
|
|
|
What was happening before was that when Netflix came out, some providers were slowing down Netflix traffic, so even if you were paying for a certain connection speed, your Netflix connections were being slowed down.
|
|
|
|