|
|
Is there more?
I ask because that part is followed by a link to the source. While not properly indicated as quote it is at least referenced. If there is nothing more I would not report the user but ask him to use proper indication.
|
|
|
|
|
I didn't see the link, I must admit - the whole thing just smells of plagiarism (the use of images for code blocks which include notes and such like, the change of language ability, all of that) so I grabbed a random sentence and searched, and it came up "bingo"! So I reported it.
I'm pretty sure the whole code is a copy and paste from a pdf / book so I'll stand by it unless you think it's legit.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
The code can't be simple checked while provided as images and article is gone now
I just wanted to point out that this might be a border case and reporting the user should not be done until we are sure.
|
|
|
|
|
While the article still was in moderation, I tried to find if the code was copied from elsewhere but I didn't find any evidence that it would have been plagiarized.
So as far I I can see it was suffering from formatting issues, at least that's what I chose to report.
|
|
|
|
|
I've struck out the member link for the moment - let's see if he comes back with "no it isn't" or similar. I would, if something I'd written was closed because people thought I didn't write it!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
I think that is the best option. Mika has searched for the code without finding it. When it is not only printed, it should be findable (as separate download or extracted from PDF).
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did I get 'em?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
you missed the last one. The link is visible in the snippet
subject: "do you have any suggestions?"
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eyelash enhancer - do you think I need it? My eyes are already fantastic, Dahhhhling.... Nuviante Eyelash - Professional Profile[^]
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
modified 28-Apr-17 14:15pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
... but Message now "Automatically removed". I've requested a tidy up on that article in Bugs and Suggestions[^] so we can see the wood from the trees (or is that the spam from the real meat?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Snap, snap and snap again!
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
I shouldn't have spent so long checking!
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Spammer: Roxy Chan - Professional Profile[^]
Spam: Latest Messages[^]
A return to the old "IP address" spam links.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
modified 28-Apr-17 9:13am.
|
|
|
|
|
Spammer: Member 12847924 - Professional Profile[^]
Spam: Latest Messages[^]
View the source of both messages - they both have "hidden" links.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
modified 28-Apr-17 14:35pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
And some more in the same article forum:
C++ Wrappers for the Expat XML Parser[^]
Most users are gone but messages and some users need to be reported (messages where link text are IP addresses).
|
|
|
|
|
|