|
|
|
All gone
modified 22-Jun-17 10:22am.
|
|
|
|
|
The 2 missing have been given a 2nd chance by Sean (see above)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
All gone
modified 22-Jun-17 10:18am.
|
|
|
|
|
The 1 missing has been given a 2nd chance by sean (see above)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All gone
modified 22-Jun-17 10:21am.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined today, posting spammy links in article forums:
milad71 - Professional Profile[^]
At least one message got through: Latest Messages[^]
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
modified 20-Jun-17 1:29am.
|
|
|
|
|
This article
The beginning (Introduction and Purpose of Microservice) looks like being copied from here .
The again if you have a look at "Data Sovereignty" -part and compare it to "Data Sovereignty Per Microservice" in here, it feels just like condensed explanation from msdn...
Any opinions?
|
|
|
|
|
The numbered list is copy, paste, and minor tweak.
The "author": SHANIR A - Professional Profile[^] - he'll need a good kicking as well.
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
That's what I was afraid of
Thank you for confirming!
|
|
|
|
|
No second Chance? I'm sure, same can happen to others (incl. me) but because they a are more frequently on they will get first a warning.
btw: Yes I'm aware about the rules.
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: No second Chance? I'm sure, same can happen to others (incl. me) but because they a are more frequently on they will get first a warning.
I know what you mean, but then again the article seems to be a copy-paste with only minor modifications. Also some references were mentioned, but not the ones that seemed to be the original sources. This gives a feeling that plagiarism was intentional, not by accident.
Have a look at Sean's r typical answer to plagiarism: over here
|
|
|
|
|
I see all these arguments. But I like to remember also "then and when" to "keep care" when reporting. This because sometimes I have the feeling that reporting becomes a discipline here.
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I think Wendelius did exactly the right thing - asked for a 2nd opinion, but was able to identify a potential source. That to me is applying "discipline" when reporting.
The rules are quite clear - plagiarism will simply not be tolerated at all. It is lying - it is not acceptable in most societies and it is not acceptable on this site. It's not as if the member only just joined - he's been around for over 2 years so has had plenty of opportunity to learn how it is.
Reporting of spam can be more difficult - has the link been included in the post because it is an example of the problem or because the member is site-driving? It's not always obvious.
But then, responding to a post in this forum by reporting an article, post or member should not be a blind act - each member should act on their own conscience when reporting.
|
|
|
|
|
Plagiarist terminated.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
All gone
modified 22-Jun-17 10:21am.
|
|
|
|
|
All gone
modified 22-Jun-17 10:21am.
|
|
|
|
|
All gone
modified 22-Jun-17 10:20am.
|
|
|
|
|
All gone
modified 22-Jun-17 10:20am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All gone
modified 22-Jun-17 10:20am.
|
|
|
|
|
All gone
modified 22-Jun-17 10:20am.
|
|
|
|