|
|
It's a bug.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
The question is from 2010. Good start
The guy posted identical solutions 4 and 5, so 5 should be a Repost.
But, solutions 4 and 5 are also an almost copy of solutions 2 and 3, in my opinion, I would have voted as an Abuse, but the option have disappeared.
Open PDF file Using VB.Net Application[^]
The guy is gone very far:
In comment 1 "nice", he show appreciation for its own solution
In comment 2 "thanku", he thanks himself for the appreciation
Note that solution 3 is also a Repost of solution 2, but are from another guy.
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
I reported a while ago that 'new' was showing up all the time. I reported it.
Bugs and Suggestions[^]
Today new is now working as I would think it should.
And I didn't realize until now how much better that is.
|
|
|
|
|
Sigh, today it looks like it is back to the old behavior.
|
|
|
|
|
I think In Code project Request Article to particular author or author facility should be add
If added then it would be great.
What do you think?
|
|
|
|
|
Hardevsinh Mori wrote: What do you think? I think you need to explain exactly what that means.
|
|
|
|
|
I mean most of the members here for learning & programming on perticular. Suppose someone has problem c# multidimensional array practice then S/he can request to author to write on this topic and also other member can get that article.
|
|
|
|
|
That is already covered in the forums and Q&A.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think you understand what an article is, or just how much work is involved in writing one.
Generally speaking, an article will take anything between a day to a month (or even longer) of solid work to write, polish, and publish - and everyone who writes articles is a volunteer. That mean they fit it in around work and life commitments, they do not get paid to write them. Which means that the "lead time" to publish an article can be months or even years. That's not practical for you as the consumer who needs help with a specific topic such as multidimensional arrays - your final exam will be over before you get to read it!
I don't personally think it would be a popular and useful extension to the site. Plus, it would immediately be abused by idiots who want their homework done; and we get enough of them in QA already ...
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Writing a comment e.g. in Q/A and press "Submit": It does not Show the comment after "Submit"... leads to reposting also from other expririenced users
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
We were doing updates at around the time you reported this, so some comments may have failed for a brief time.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
... and shown correct after refresh page, only for Information
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
See above. (and thanks for the report)
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for rply. Nope the issue is older than one year and not related to "above". Sorry for that
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
In this question C# division by zero for doubles - comvisible - infinity vs. Dividebyzeroexception[^]I entered the title
C# division by zero for doubles - COMVisible - Infinity vs. DivideByZeroException
which will be shown as
C# division by zero for doubles - comvisible - infinity vs. Dividebyzeroexception
Not a big thing, but I think caps should not be adjusted automatically/randomly...
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I was pretty sure I posted a "Pointless" response to the survey, not the one that is there. Was it removed or did I have a senior moment and didn't actually post it.
It was along the lines of an honest person would not but a dishonest person would lie in the survey so the question is pointless.
BTW the above observation also invalidates @ChrisMaunders observation of the morals of the members.
Never underestimate the power of human stupidity
RAH
|
|
|
|
|
Are you accusing our survey of not being the pinnacle of scientific rigour?!
As to the señor moment, I can't comment.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
...both by the same member: Member 13409396 - Professional Profile[^]
(The answer was to his own question).
The reason I deleted it was it was somehow causing an automatic redirect to an invalid home page and bookmarking something, and while I managed to kill the question redirect with ESC and editing, I couldn't do anything with the answer.
I don't think it was malicious - it seemed to be "normal" PHP code - but I couldn't get messages to him (no buttons) and it's his only posts to the site. Could someone have a quiet word and explain about code blocks and why his question was deleted?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Or better yet, fix the XSS bug that lets a QA post execute code.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
My email is confirmed but not updated in my settings and also can not sign in with the confirmed email please solve this bug(if any)
|
|
|
|
|
If you can't sign in, how did you post this?
Are you saying that you are trying to change your email and the new one confirms OK but doesn't "take" so the old email works and the new one doesn't? Or is this on a separate account?
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trying to report this spam message[^], but it doesn't have the "report" flag.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
It seems to be very common that articles/blogs/tips with obvious problems with formatting, image locations, content etc. get approved. Latest example Step by Step CRUD Operation using Web API2 & MVC 6
Just a question, if the reports for an article (while in moderation) are not weighed, should they be? Could this help so that incomplete articles would not get approved too easily?
|
|
|
|