|
Technologies from several projects will provide a pipeline of new capabilities in Java 18.3 and later versions Checks current C# feature set...
|
|
|
|
|
The new system would make use of tiny disturbances in magnetic orientation, which have been dubbed "skyrmions." Sorry, I took an arrow to the knee and can't come up with a blurb
I think that might not even be funny if you get the reference.
edit: yeah, I has brain hurtz
modified 4-Oct-17 10:30am.
|
|
|
|
|
I used to be a coder like you before...
But then you know, the arrow...
|
|
|
|
|
Wow.. I sense a disturbance in the force with that one!
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: I took an arrow to the knee
"Message for you, Sir!"
If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack.
--Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
I fail to see the connection between the phys.org article and the debunking of beliefs about the best way to manage emails, unless the improved speeds of computers will necessitate managing, as there will be so many more emails?
"If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough."
Alan Kay.
|
|
|
|
|
I think you used the wrong subject for this message. (see below)
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
You could have said remoove instead of bypass. Yeah, I'm not getting anything either.
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: magnetic orientation
Monopoles? Where's Sheldon? Or was that the can opener?
|
|
|
|
|
Do you believe emailing gets in the way of more important tasks at work – or that checking your inbox only a few times a day is the most efficient approach? So ignoring them until the sender retires isn't a good idea?
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: So ignoring them until the sender retires isn't a good idea? It's worked for me so far... If you disagree, just email me - I can wait.
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
For someone relatively new to the field of programming, the subject of code comments would cause some definite confusion. That’s because experienced folks in the field can’t seem to agree on the topic. /* ' # REM <!-- something goes here --> */
|
|
|
|
|
You forgot //
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Dang. So much for inclusivity!
Back to the 101 for me.
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
# Who would stoop so low?
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft... in PowerShell. Yes... yes.. it has been done.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
Or perhaps for the most fun,
It Is The Absolute Verifiable Truth & Proven Fact
That Your Belly-Button Signature Ties
To Viviparous Mama.
|
|
|
|
|
That seemed a bit familiar, so I checked history here.
He wrote the same article in slightly different packaging for someone else a week ago.
Is There a Correct Way to Comment Your Code? - DaedTech[^]
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
In 2016, Yahoo disclosed that more than one billion of about three billion accounts had likely been affected by the hack. In its disclosure Tuesday, the company said all accounts were likely victimized. Yahoo!
|
|
|
|
|
That's about half the worlds population. Taking into consideration the actual popularity of Yahoo these days and the people I know that use a yahoo account, I'd say the jokes on the hackers trying to figure out which accounts are actually valid/active/useful. HotMomma34450983405343@yahoo.com better lookout! Don't think you're out of the woods AOL, they're coming for you next!!
|
|
|
|
|
Someone didn’t install a patch when they should’ve. That’s it. That caused the 145-million person data leak. The buck stops there
|
|
|
|
|
During the initial interview for this IT employee, they asked him if he was responsible. He said yes. You can't say he didn't warn you.
|
|
|
|
|
Did anyone mention that none (or only part) of the data was encrypted? That individual was FAR from being the sole problem! Equifax ex-CEO: Hacked data wasn't encrypted - CBS News
It Is The Absolute Verifiable Truth & Proven Fact
That Your Belly-Button Signature Ties
To Viviparous Mama.
|
|
|
|
|
Academic researchers have published a study investigating the effect of programming languages on software quality, concluding the issue is hard to quantify but also identifying significant findings, such as functional languages having an edge over procedural/object-oriented languages. "Computer languages of the future will be more concerned with goals and less with procedures specified by the programmer."
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Academic researchers
I stopped there.
[edit]OK, so I took a peek. The conclusion -- we can't conclude anything. There you go, academic research at its finest! [/edit]
|
|
|
|