|
|
Getting error.
Please sent Source Code of C++
Email deleted unless OP wants a lot of spam.
modified 19-Jul-18 5:27am.
|
|
|
|
|
Which source code?
If you refer to a specific article, provide the link to that article. If that article has a download option for source code that is not working, write a comment in the article forum (at the bottom of the article page). Then the author gets notified and can update his article.
Don't post your email address in public forums. Such are parsed by spammers so that you might get more spam.
I suggest to edit your post to add the required information (article link) and remove your email address.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi folks. Anyone managed to embed a video in an article they've published to CP? I have a short animation as an mp4. Tried video tag no luck.
Cheers
modified 14-Jul-18 14:15pm.
|
|
|
|
|
I think the easiest way would be to upload it to YouTube then embed the video that way. We don't currently have the ability to upload direct video files for that purpose, and we only have a select number of sites that we allow embedded videos from.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Don't forget the sunglasses
Blog
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 13-Jul-18 2:07am.
|
|
|
|
|
All fixed.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
thanks all
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm writing an article using the site's html editor. My source code is
<p><img src="NoAdmin.jpg" /></p>
But when I hit the preview button, the image just shows up as a small, blank square that looks like this:
In the editing window it looks fine.
What am I doing wrong?
JLD
modified 9-Jul-18 17:12pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm. That should be working. Here is our FAQ entry on it:
Code Project Article FAQ[^]
If you'd like to publish your article now please let me know and I can make sure the images are visible.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Today the images are showing nicely in preview, so I went ahead and published it. But thanks for your quick response, Sean.
JLD
|
|
|
|
|
I had several problems with images either not showing or not showing at the correct size in the preview. If I remember right a refresh of the page or closing and reopening the preview fixed it. I knew they would be present when published.
|
|
|
|
|
That's kind of what happened to me. When I pulled up the draft of the article the next day, it worked fine.
JLD
|
|
|
|
|
The project download is infected with the URL:Mal virus.
https://www.codeproject.com/Tips/1200547/Beveled-Panel-with-Shadow-Effect
My antivirus program aborts the download.
|
|
|
|
|
Could you please let us know which anti virus you were using? It could be a false positive unique to the program.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
This was dual posted here[^].
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
I recently created a blog and now my articles are feeding from the blog to CP.
That's all good.
I want to post some articles to that blog but they may not be technical enough so I don't want them to get pulled by CP.
I currently place that tag* at the bottom of my article and I believe that is what triggers CP to pull, right?
*<a href="https://www.codeproject.com" rel="tag">CodeProject</a>
Question
Is my thinking correct that as long as I don't add that tag to the bottom of an article then it _won't_ be pulled by CP?
FYI, my feed link used by CP is : http://raddev.us/arduino/syndication.axd[^]
Just attempting to insure non-tech items don't get pulled to CP.
Thanks for any help.
|
|
|
|
|
raddevus wrote: I currently place that tag* at the bottom of my article and I believe that is what triggers CP to pull, right?
Correct
raddevus wrote: as long as I don't add that tag to the bottom of an article then it _won't_ be pulled by CP?
Again, correct.
If all else fails let us know and we'll get the hammers out.
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|
|
Ok, that's great. Thanks for the definitive answer.
I just didn't want spurious blog posts to hit CP.
modified 6-Jul-18 14:49pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Today I got below email regarding my article submissions
"Congratulations! The changes you have made to article Creating an Amazon Elastic Cloud Compute (EC2) instance have been approved and are now publicly available."
Then after some time I got another mail saying that the article is closed and codeproject could not publish it.
I am confused, could any one tell me,after approval mail why I got another mail and why it's rejected.
modified 2-Aug-18 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is not plagiarism, this article is written by me only , and I first upload it in another portal but I did not get any response from them.So I posted it here in code project.please Let me know what should I do to publish it here?
modified 2-Aug-18 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|
|
All the text is simply lifted from various websites.
If you've copied the text from other sites, that is plagiarism.
Picking an example at random:
Your article: Amazon Web Services (AWS) allows customers to assign metadata to their AWS resources in the form of tags. Each tag is a simple label consisting of a customer-defined key and an optional value that can make it easier to manage, search for, and filter resources. Amazon Web Services (AWS) allows customers to assign metadata to their AWS resources in the form of tags. Each tag is a simple label consisting of a customer-defined key and an optional value that can make it easier to manage, search for, and filter resources.
Unless you're trying to tell us that you wrote the AWS answers article (you didn't), then the article is not "written by you only". You have stolen other people's content and tried to pass it off as your own work.
As I said, plagiarism is not tolerated here.
Having been caught, had you accepted your mistake and apologised, you might have stood a chance of convincing the site admins to grant you a second chance. Instead, you chose to deny any wrongdoing, despite the evidence to the contrary. As a result, your account will be terminated, and the admins are extremely unlikely to restore it.
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the quick response.Now I understand my mistake.so now I very much clear what is needed here.sorry for inconvenience.
modified 2-Aug-18 21:02pm.
|
|
|
|