|
I have a problem to save userControl to PNG By Drop & Drag.
I can save it with a Button_Click But, I try to use an easy way to save UserControl to PNG with drop & drag
What to do am I, I don't know to get path Windows Explorer or The desktop where mouse drop file? Thanks for suggesting.
I use this Button_Click()
<pre>private void saveToPng_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
string filePath = Environment.CurrentDirectory;
var control = this.Control;
RenderTargetBitmap rtb = new RenderTargetBitmap((int)control.ActualWidth, (int)control.ActualHeight, 96, 96, PixelFormats.Pbgra32);
Rect bounds = VisualTreeHelper.GetDescendantBounds(control);
DrawingVisual dv = new DrawingVisual();
using (DrawingContext ctx = dv.RenderOpen())
{
VisualBrush vb = new VisualBrush(control);
ctx.DrawRectangle(vb, null, new Rect(new Point(), bounds.Size));
}
rtb.Render(dv);
PngBitmapEncoder png = new PngBitmapEncoder();
png.Frames.Add(BitmapFrame.Create(rtb));
using (Stream fileStream = new FileStream(filePath+"test.png", FileMode.Create))
{
png.Save(fileStream);
}
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
thanks, Eddy Vluggend
But, I need Drag UserControl from my-app and Drop it to Windows-Explorer or Desktop to Saving Format PNG.
Do U understand my problem?
I want to save UI of UserControl BY Drop-Drag as Format PNG
|
|
|
|
|
|
I use WPF-XAML and the code was about windows-Form, I can't understand that.
Can U help me with a sample of WPF-XAML?
please use WPF-XAML
Thank
|
|
|
|
|
I have no experience with XAML. Google is your friend, I imagine the proces to be very similar
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi. I am used to visual basic so I need help with a C# conversion. I have a for that allows opening a choice of other forms. I am used to the form.show approach.
public partial class Form1 : Form
{
public Form1()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
private void Form1_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
}
private void cmdLotto_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Form = new Form(LottoConverter);
Form.ShowDialog();
}
private void cmdEuro_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Form = new Form(EuroConverter);
Form.ShowDialog();
|
|
|
|
|
Try this:
private void cmdLotto_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Form lc = new LottoConverter();
lc.ShowDialog();
}
private void cmdEuro_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Form ec = new EuroConverter();
ec.ShowDialog();
{
Or better:
private void cmdLotto_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
LottoConverter lc = new LottoConverter();
lc.ShowDialog();
}
private void cmdEuro_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
EuroConverter ec = new EuroConverter();
ec.ShowDialog();
{
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks that makes sense Form is a class and I need an instance of the class. However I still have 4 errors.
Error 1 'Lottery.LottoConverter' is a 'type' but is used like a 'variable' D:\Vb Apps.Net\C# Apps\Lotto\Lottery\Selector.cs 26 28 Lottery
Error 2 'System.Windows.Forms.Form' does not contain a constructor that takes '1' arguments D:\Vb Apps.Net\C# Apps\Lotto\Lottery\Selector.cs 26 19 Lottery
Error 3 'Lottery.EuroConverter' is a 'type' but is used like a 'variable' D:\Vb Apps.Net\C# Apps\Lotto\Lottery\Selector.cs 32 28 Lottery
Error 4 'System.Windows.Forms.Form' does not contain a constructor that takes '1' arguments D:\Vb Apps.Net\C# Apps\Lotto\Lottery\Selector.cs 32 19 Lottery
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry. Typing error. This works fine now. Thanks a lot.
|
|
|
|
|
You're welcome!
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Try to create both Contructors to each Form Class, maybe it helps!
|
|
|
|
|
Dear All,
I have created billing system for Motorcycle service centers using c# .
I wan't to add a feature, when the user print the final invoice, customer will receive a sms from the name of the service dealer which including thanks for the coming to the service.
and also after three months of the time that he last came to the service, system has to send a message to the customer that saying please come for the next service bla bla etc.
Can any one guide me how to do this? for this feature I planned to install a 4G Dongle and sim card from local cellular service to the service dealer's pc.
|
|
|
|
|
What have you tried?
Where are you stuck?
What help do you need?
Sent from my Amstrad PC 1640
Never throw anything away, Griff
Bad command or file name. Bad, bad command! Sit! Stay! Staaaay...
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
Using a dongle is probably over-complicating things and certainly impacts scalability (if you need a second PC you need another dongle + SIM + contract etc).
There are plenty of webservices out there that will send an SMS for you, and give you additional management info / usage data etc.
Depending on volumes you might even find a free provider, though often the free services (understandably) inject adverts into your text. Not knowing which country you're in I can't recommend a specific service...
Once you have a webservice interface, it's very simple to integrate into your C# project and no worries about hardware etc. Some of these services even allow you to schedule texts for future dates - don't know if up to 3 months in advance, though!
Google "send sms from webservice"
Cheers,
Derek
|
|
|
|
|
I'm facing a new situation involving a program, written in .NET Framework 4.0/C#, which has to encode/decode and sign messages to be sent/received in a particular kind of WAN. This is the current scenario, which is working fine. We have a .p12 file (which contains the sender certificate) and a .cer file (which contains the receiver certificate), which are both installed in the pc. The scenario is working using SHA1 and PKCS#7 at 1024 bit, so the following piece of code works:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Security.Cryptography.X509Certificates;
using System.Security.Cryptography.Pkcs;
using System.Security.Cryptography;
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Controls;
using System.Collections;
private static string senderCert = "sendername";
private static string receiverCert = "receivername";
public static byte[] Verify(this byte[] signedData)
{
X509Certificate2 certPub = GetReceiverCert();
if (certPub == null) return null;
ContentInfo decodeContentInfo = new ContentInfo(signedData);
SignedCms decodeCMS = new SignedCms(decodeContentInfo, false);
try
{
decodeCMS.Decode(signedData);
SignerInfo signerInfo = decodeCMS.SignerInfos[0];
X509Certificate2Collection certCollection = new
X509Certificate2Collection(certPub);
return decodeCMS.ContentInfo.Content;
}
catch (CryptographicException err)
{
Logger.Log(err);
return null;
}
}
private static X509Certificate2 GetSenderCert()
{
X509Store storeMy = new X509Store(StoreName.My, StoreLocation.CurrentUser);
storeMy.Open(OpenFlags.ReadOnly);
X509Certificate2Collection certColl = storeMy.Certificates.Find
(X509FindType.FindBySubjectName, senderCert, false);
if (certColl.Count == 0)
return null;
storeMy.Close();
return certColl[0];
}
private static X509Certificate2 GetReceiverCert()
{
X509Store storeMy = new X509Store(StoreName.My,
StoreLocation.CurrentUser);
storeMy.Open(OpenFlags.ReadOnly);
X509Certificate2Collection certColl = storeMy.Certificates.Find
(X509FindType.FindBySubjectName, receiverCert, false);
if (certColl.Count == 0)
return null;
storeMy.Close();
return certColl[0];
}
public static byte[] Sign(this byte[] data)
{
X509Certificate2 certificate = GetSenderCert();
if (certificate == null) return null;
if (data == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("data");
if (certificate == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException("certificate");
ContentInfo content = new ContentInfo(data);
signedCms = new SignedCms(content, false);
CmsSigner signer = new CmsSigner(certificate);
signer.IncludeOption = X509IncludeOption.EndCertOnly;
signedCms.ComputeSignature(signer);
return signedCms.Encode();
}
As I said before, this code works fine under the given scenario (SHA1+PKCS#7 at 1024 bit). Now the client asks an update of the crypthography, in particular using SHA256 instead of SHA1 and PKCS#10 instead of PKCS#7 with key length 2048 bit instead of 1024.
According to your experience, what should I do to get the new requirements?
The only thing I'm sure is that I cannot use a NET Framework greater than this one because the devices are old XPs and they cannot be changed for company issues. So I cannot use new libraries released for .NET 4.7.1 to solve my problem.
I suppose that the new certificates will be released as the previous method, a file for sender, another one for receiver, to be installed in the machine.
Honestly I haven't a lot of experience with crypto and I would like to find an easy path which can follow the logic of the current methods, since the fact their scope wouldn't be changed, but just the signing approach.
I have no other limitations in using other libraries, pinvoke and other stuff, if it can really help.
Thanks to all of you for your support.
Any suggestion is appreciated. Regards
|
|
|
|
|
Im trying to publish a message that should communicate between classes:
public sealed class EventMessager : IEventMessager
{
private readonly Dictionary<Type, object> subscriberLookup = new Dictionary<Type, object>();
public IObservable<T> Observe<T>()
{
if (!subscriberLookup.TryGetValue(typeof(T), out object subject))
{
subject = new Subject<T>();
subscriberLookup.Add(typeof(T), subject);
}
return ((ISubject<T>)subject).AsObservable();
}
public void Publish<T>(T @event)
{
if (subscriberLookup.TryGetValue(@event.GetType(), out object subject))
{
((Subject<T>)subject).OnNext(@event);
}
}
}
This works well, except for the time I wanted to use Reflection in order to initate a new Message class like so:
eventMessager.Publish(Activator.CreateInstance(w[0]));
It complains that it cannot cast the subject of class type that w is as an Subject Object.
It will work as expected if I just say new MyClass instead of the activator.
I really cant find any solutions online either, so does anyone know what is going on here?
modified 6-Sep-18 2:05am.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm a bit tired here so I'm having a problem groking what you want to achieve here but one thing that stands out is that you are calling a generic Publish method with a reflected object and expecting Subject<t> to know what type the subject is.
This space for rent
|
|
|
|
|
Activator.CreateInstance(Type) returns an Object .
Activator.CreateInstance Method (System) | Microsoft Docs[^]
As a result, you are calling eventMessager.Publish<object>(instanceOfYourType) .
That uses the run-time type of the parameter to find the subscriber. This will be a Subject<YourClass> instance.
You then try to cast that instance to Subject<object> , which fails because the Subject<T> class is not covariant on its type parameter.
Covariance and Contravariance in Generics | Microsoft Docs[^]
You can't even get away with casting the subscriber to the IObserver<T> interface, since that interface is contravariant.
You're going to need to use reflection to invoke the method. I'd suggest using a separate method to avoid making the regular method slower:
public void PublishNew(Type eventType)
{
if (subscriberLookup.TryGetValue(eventType, out object subject))
{
object @event = Activator.CreateInstance(eventType);
Type t = typeof(IObserver<>).MakeGenericType(eventType);
MethodInfo onNext = t.GetMethod("OnNext");
onNext.Invoke(subject, new[] { @event });
}
}
...
eventMessager.PublishNew(w[0]);
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
modified 5-Sep-18 13:17pm.
|
|
|
|
|
Ah, that works perfectly, thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard Deeming wrote: I'd suggest using a separate method to avoid making the regular method slower:
I found some other lower level code that the author claimed was 10 times faster than Activator.CreateInastance:
public class ObjectCreateMethod
{
delegate object MethodInvoker();
MethodInvoker methodHandler = null;
public ObjectCreateMethod(Type type)
{
CreateMethod(type.GetConstructor(Type.EmptyTypes));
}
public ObjectCreateMethod(ConstructorInfo target)
{
CreateMethod(target);
}
void CreateMethod(ConstructorInfo target)
{
DynamicMethod dynamic = new DynamicMethod(string.Empty,
typeof(object),
new Type[0],
target.DeclaringType);
ILGenerator il = dynamic.GetILGenerator();
il.DeclareLocal(target.DeclaringType);
il.Emit(OpCodes.Newobj, target);
il.Emit(OpCodes.Stloc_0);
il.Emit(OpCodes.Ldloc_0);
il.Emit(OpCodes.Ret);
methodHandler = (MethodInvoker)dynamic.CreateDelegate(typeof(MethodInvoker));
}
public object CreateInstance()
{
return methodHandler();
}
}
But you have solved my problem, so this does not bother me as much.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Folks,
I have a referenced .dll in one of the projects in my solution, and from what I can tell during debugging most of it appears to be used and accessed without issue.
However, when calling a 'getModelDataContext' function from the model.designer.cs file that should be within the .dll, nothing seems to happen. It appears to not be reachable ('under the caret') when I try to jump to its definition. It is not breaking though when it hits this function, but it is not returning a valid data connection, and then a subsequent function call is using an empty data set and failing at that point.
Does anyone have any ideas how I can approach this please?
Many thanks,
AJ
|
|
|
|
|
Look at the source code (if you have it), or the documentation provided by whoever created the DLL. You should be able to collect more information from the debugger by single-stepping through the code.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you, that's a good idea. I'll see if I can get into the source code for some further investigation.
All the best,
AJ
|
|
|
|
|
This was based on silly oversight on my part. Although I was unable to access the functions and files through the .dll itself. After looking through the source code I found that it was in fact accessing everything and the result it was producing was in fact perfectly fine as per the underlying code.
The issue truned out to be with the data I had been sent to test the API with as it did not match a suitable record in another system used to retrieve additional record data.
I'm still not sure why I was unable to navigate to the file in question through the .dll but thankfully, as I was able to get into the original sorce code, I managed to work aroung this.
Thank you Richard for your input!
AJ
|
|
|
|
|