|
|
Roslyn, the .NET compiler platform, helps you catch bugs even before you run your code. Assuming you want to write better code, of course
|
|
|
|
|
Wow!
This is great!
And it's also a first, because no company has ever made such claims before!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
The problem I've run across with Microsoft's code analyzers is the number of false positives. This is compounded by a lack of clear guidance on what things are important; a lot of items in Microsoft's tool are inconsequential. (And sometimes their suggestions are bonkers, especially the ones that want you to use something extremely verbose to replace something completely legal and succinct.)
|
|
|
|
|
If Intellisense is any indication this tool will be so bug-ridden it is useless.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
The malware doesn’t steal data from a user. Instead, it hacks apps and forces them to display more ads or takes credit for the ads they already display so that the malware’s operator can profit off the fraudulent views. "I can taste your stink and every time I do, I fear that I've somehow been infected by it."
|
|
|
|
|
So they're only "stealing" from google, the greatest thieves in history?
Good on 'em!
More power to their elbow supports!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Security researcher Marcus Mengs discovered that the flaws are caused by Logitech dongles' outdated firmware and that they allow attackers with physical access to their targets' computers to exploit the bugs and launch keystroke injection attacks, record keystrokes, and take control of compromised systems. People with physical access to your keyboard (dongle) can enter keys?
hhhWWWWwhaaaaaat?
|
|
|
|
|
I've discovered a vulnerability where someone with physical access to your device (not just electronic) can walk away with it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
But the questipn is: Do you make money out of it?
Bluddy "researchers" are malware producers by another name -- and they all stink of sh1t.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
It turns out that you don’t need a computer to create an artificial intelligence. In fact, you don’t even need electricity. My latest transparent attempt at clickbait
|
|
|
|
|
Shh!
I'm struggling to get the cacodemon death animations to work on this broken wine bottle!
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
What does AI mean?
Whatever you want it to mean.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: “We could potentially use the glass as a biometric lock, tuned to recognize only one person’s face,” Yu said. “Once built, it would last forever without needing power or internet, meaning it could keep something safe for you even after thousands of years.” Well, I'll just have to see about that.
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft said it "strongly recommends" that users and admins install this latest SSU before installing the latest cumulative update, which was released along with this month's Patch Tuesday updates. Our patches have patches
|
|
|
|
|
I'll bet that the patch just renames it "Insecureboot"!
That's what I'd do.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
It's a feature!
TTFN - Kent
|
|
|
|
|
doctest is a relatively new C++ testing framework but is by far the fastest both in terms of compile times (by orders of magnitude) and runtime compared to other feature-rich alternatives. C++ devs test their code?
|
|
|
|
|
I use Catch. It doesn't have built-in coverage tools, but does the job I need it to do.
|
|
|
|
|
Break up the tech giants? Been there, (almost) done that. But the DOJ’s battle to rein in Microsoft didn’t turn out the way anyone expected. "Memories, sweetened thru the ages just like wine"
|
|
|
|
|
What a silly article. Quote: “You either fit into their Windows ecosystem or they would attempt to destroy you.” Yeah, sure.
Then they repeat the nonsense about Netscape, conveniently ignoring that it a) was being given away and b) sucked.
The article also fails to account for two complete Microsoft fails; IE and Phone (as in going from the handheld scanner market to phones.) Aside from other reasons, they just didn't care. I expect Google and Amazon to eventually head down the same rabbit hole.
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Woodbury wrote: What a silly article. Quote: “You either fit into their Windows ecosystem or they would attempt to destroy you.” Yeah, sure.
Then they repeat the nonsense about Netscape, conveniently ignoring that it a) was being given away and b) sucked.
The article also fails to account for two complete Microsoft fails; IE and Phone (as in going from the handheld scanner market to phones.) Aside from other reasons, they just didn't care. I expect Google and Amazon to eventually head down the same rabbit hole.
I could say the same about your comment. You repeat the top level ranting point mantra that IE was the problem; while ignoring that the problem wasn't that IE6 sucked, it got its high 90s percentage market share because it was much better than the buggy unstable POS that was Nutscrape 4.7. The problem was that MS declared victory around the 90% market share point stopped developing IE and disbanded the dev team beyond a handful of people who were chasing security vulnerabilities while first Mozilla and then Google continued developing the web and created browsers that left IE in the dust.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|
|
That was my badly made point; Microsoft lost dominance in two areas due to their apathy. It's interesting to me how many dominant companies lose their position in a similar way. Yes, there may be stiff competition, but the refusal or inability to adapt plays a large role. Sears comes to mind.
|
|
|
|
|
Joe Woodbury wrote: Yes, there may be stiff competition, but... ... When a company reaches a certain size, with the inevitable percentage of employees who are dog-@rse useless at their jobs, everyone stops worrying about "external competition", because all their time is focussed on the competition for their jobs from dog-@rsed incompetent employees who are better at sucking up to the boss.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|