|
True, but doesn't change the point that most of the bacteria still won't like penniciline.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: Evolution works for every life form, even bacteria. ... And for bacteria, it works bloody quickly.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Eddy Vluggen wrote: doesn't mean that there will be a supervirus that evolves simply because we identify a new antibecterium Actually, it kinda does. Think of it as an arms race, but a heavily one-sided one, because bacteria can breed and evolve faster than we can keep coming up with new antibacterial agents.
I shouldn't worry, though. We'll all have drowned, frozen, or fried long before super-bacteria can become a problem.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, but can they keep up with new forms of Essential Oils?
- I would love to change the world, but they won’t give me the source code.
|
|
|
|
|
Not if you keep repeatedly mixing the essential oils with water, until there are no essential oils left in the solution.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Blasting laser pulses at aluminum skin on a quantum cascade laser modulates light faster than electronic circuits can The engineers are restless
|
|
|
|
|
Them ain't clouds, they's smoke signals.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
So basically an acoustic coupler strapped on fiber optics..... "You've got mail"
Director of Transmogrification Services
Shinobi of Query Language
Master of Yoda Conditional
|
|
|
|
|
Our annual analysis of the O’Reilly online learning platform reveals Python’s continued dominance and important shifts in infrastructure, AI/ML, cloud, and security. Or: people just like books with snakes on the cover
|
|
|
|
|
Remarkable!
No icon-designing roles. That's really unexpected.
David was right.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft focused on depth and a unified look for its new icons. "Happy Happy Joy Joy"
|
|
|
|
|
I was hoping that the rest of that subject line read "extends across time and space."
Phooey.
|
|
|
|
|
How come I never see 'Icon Designer' in the best job lists (like at the top)? There seems to be a serious oversight somewhere.
|
|
|
|
|
And they're still going at it.
This is such a complete and utter waste of energy; they're trying to improve their image, from one of pratts who f*** up thousands of computers every time they issue an update, by showing that they're doing a great job in aesthetics.
But they're not even managing that. The icons are dull and lifeless, lacking in colour and vibrancy -- they're better suited to horror games than to programs people need to use to earn a living.
And all this cr@p about "across all platforms" is just marketing bull (as in, the kind of cr@p that comes out of marketeers' mouths when they have to justify their huge bill for having done very little work, and none of it the least bit creative -- say anything, just make it sound clever and keep the customer talking!)
A calendar icon is a calendar icon; a calculator icon is a calculator icon. How much more "cognitive load to scan and find applications" does anyone need? Or am I missing some superbly ingenious tweak that makes the icons look more like calendars and calculators?
Um, no, I'm not. The incompetent idiots found the term "cognitive load" in a piece by someone intelligent, and have decided to use it as a buzzword, in the hope that the original writer's intelligence will reflect from them into the customer's eyes.
Me, I can't wait for the next wave of emojis. I'll need them for when I have to remind the high court that it needs to pay its bill.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Dozens of studies find remote workers happy and productive. Why not let them be? "Human beings were not meant to sit in little cubicles staring at computer screens all day, filling out useless forms and listening to eight different bosses drone on about about mission statements."
|
|
|
|
|
But quick chats at the coffee machine are one of my main sources of information and inspiration!
Standing by my coffee machine at home and talking to myself won't be half as useful.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
The browser wars are starting to heat up again as both Google and Microsoft promote their software at the expense of their competitors. Good news for those who missed the browser wars the first time
|
|
|
|
|
I don't use browsers (or derivatives) from either google or microsoft, so colour me Swiss, and send me all your money -- I'll keep it in an account so secret that even you will never know you've got it.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
ISPs say that a law requiring users to opt-in to having their location and financial data sold is a 'burdensome restriction' on their 'protected speech.' "Has commerce hitherto done anything more than change the objects of war?"
|
|
|
|
|
I can't wait to see them try that argument in Europe.
First amendment? First amendment of what, you say?
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|
|
Data is not speech, and companies aren't humans; so no, wouldn't apply even if you tried real hard.
Protection of saying what you want is absolutely not the same as the right to sell data. Imagine the other way around; employees should be able to share any insider-trading numbers based on free speech.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
The corporations are arguing that they have a 1st amendment right to sell collected data from its users without restrictions or notifications.
Are you arguing that the companies DO have the right to sell your collected data or that they DO but its not via the 1st amendment as they are claiming?
|
|
|
|
|
YSLGuru wrote: Are you arguing that the companies DO have the right to sell your collected data or that they DO but its not via the 1st amendment as they are claiming? Since it is data, and not an opinion, it is not protected by freedom of speech. If it were up to me, then that data would be as free as any data in the company, or banned from collecting.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Corporations are claiming this 1st amendment right only because the SCOTUS ruled that they are special types of person. That is what should scare the hell out of all of us. This theft and abuse of our data is a problem but its not as big as the fact that they are claiming rights that were established for individuals and not for corporations. Individuals make up a corporation and so the corporation itself does not need to be recognized as a person of any kind and yet it is.
|
|
|
|
|
YSLGuru wrote: Individuals make up a corporation and so the corporation itself does not need to be recognized as a person of any kind and yet it is. I confess I would enjoy seeing entire corporations sent to prison, but that's the (devious and nasty) reason for the decision -- now, it is possible to blame a corporation for the crimes of the individuals within it, and the individuals get off scot-free.
It also gives corporations more rights to attack whistle-blowers, because a corporation can now sue individuals for slander and libel.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
|
|
|
|