|
Michael Haephrati wrote: These are articles and not tips. I would have published them today. Would you have published today, I would have gone for "wrong type" myself too.
Michael Haephrati wrote: The article about looking for a reliable hardware ID is based on a long research and real life project. But the length of the annexed project / source code is not a criterium for article. It is the explanation you do about the source code what counts for me. If you published them today with that little explanation you should go for tip/trick or a project. At least, this is my opinion
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
If they were new posts today, I would report as "wrong type", you can go for "incomplete" if you want a nuking kind of report but I don't see any reason to go for "abuse".
There is a bug too, I am not sure if you know about. Sometimes when CP-Staff (Editors like Deeksha or Sean or even Chris) edit a post, they get changed to an article. It often happens with blogs, but I have seen tip/tricks that get "promoted" to articles without the author knowing it.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Quite a few staff edits on this one also.
|
|
|
|
|
I know... that's why I am explaining it to 0x01AA.
I partially agree with him. On the other hand I am just tired of those "high rep members" BS comments
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quick!
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
One got through, but doesn't seem to have a payload yet:
Latest Messages[^]
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
the first 5 users have 1 report more.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Not everyone has the time to go through the entire list at the same time, plus those members might actually post spam and get reported that way. That's why those that can will strike out the one's that are closed.
Better that you wait until some have actually gone and just report that in a comment?
|
|
|
|
|
fair enough
but there have been other moments when they just remain alive because people open 2 or 3 that are gone and think all are gone.
That's what I try to avoid with that message
CHill60 wrote: Not everyone has the time to go through the entire list at the same time,
CHill60 wrote: Better that you wait until some have actually gone and just report that in a comment? If I was so sure I would think about it in a couple of days... I wouldn't post that after my own round.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
Spammer: Member 14780908 - Professional Profile[^]
Spam: Already gone
Resurrecting a question from 2016 to post a "solution" about "cracked free themes components" and "best scripts for ecommerce softwares".
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
.
Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012
|
|
|
|