|
In which case I'd like to say that EMAIL notifications to messages is not working.
And, oh yeah, how?
However. As long as they let me know about whatever however is.
|
|
|
|
|
If they are already ready, all at once. Otherwise, as they come.
GCS d--(d+) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
I agree that not everyone wants to follow up all of a sudden. But it is always a good approach to publish everything, all of a sudden. I mean it's not a TV serial, where you have to publish one episode each week.
The sh*t I complain about
It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem
~! Firewall !~
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like to get all of the parts at once.
If something's a work in progress, well, beggar's can't be choosers.
Ravings en masse^ |
---|
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein | "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
I'm guilty of not completing a series myself!
|
|
|
|
|
I forgive you
As Omar, the tent maker of Nishapur, wrote:
the moving finger writes,
and, having writ, moves on
«One day it will have to be officially admitted that what we have christened reality is an even greater illusion than the world of dreams.» Salvador Dali
|
|
|
|
|
Sort of like "I'm not fussed" but as others have said - I don't want to see articles rushed out for the sake of a timetable.
But if someone says it's a "learn XYZ in 15 days" thing then I expect them to release an article per day - lovingly pre-prepared long in advance hopefully. (I'm not making any comment on the usefulness or otherwise of articles or books about learning anything in xx days)
What I don't like is an article that has been split arbitrarily into 4 or 5 "parts" which are usually all then released at once. If it's a particularly lengthy article then by all means split it for readability. If the sections naturally form part of a progression, then by all means, split that article. A good example of when the latter works is @OriginalGriff 's series of Tips (note!) on communicating between forms.
I've often seen a dump of "articles" in moderation that individually do not qualify as articles (some of them barely qualify as tips!), separated out in what appears to a be rep-point-hunting tsunami of publications.
Rant over
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you.
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
CHill60 wrote: I've often seen a dump of "articles" in moderation that individually do not qualify as articles (some of them barely qualify as tips!), separated out in what appears to a be rep-point-hunting tsunami of publications.
Yeah, I don't like it too. When I see it I start hitting the "poor quality" or "incomplete" without mercy.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
And just like software, if you hurry it you don't get the same quality ...
I'd rather see articles well written and covering the subject matter properly, than rushed out to meet a "deadline".
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
If I'm not interested in them, it doesn't matter.
If I'm interested, then whatever works for the person who's actually taking the time to write them!
|
|
|
|
|
If the poll had multiple selection I would have clicked to "all at once" and "I don't care".
If the author already knows he is doing a serie and has more or less the ideas about how and what and so on... I prefer the serie at once with links in each article pointing to the others.
I don't like the delta deployments because I have already seen many people forgetting to add the links in previous articles or correcting them if there is a change or things like that.
But at the end of the day... I don't really care, as far as the articles are worth being published, I am fine.
EDIT: I know that the links to each other articles must be added a posteriory once published, so at least one edit per article is needed. But I accept it.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
modified 10-Jun-20 1:54am.
|
|
|
|