|
ZurdoDev wrote:
Not sure it really matters. Nothing is unhackable. That is what doesn't really matters... There is no 100% security, that's something already known... but has to be that easy so often?
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
In this post, App. Dev. Manager Vishal Saroopchand showcase similarities and differences on important topics for C# developers learning Go.
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft Premier Developer: similarities and differences on important topics for C# developers learning Go. I think they had to pay attention while writing this sentence...
It could have said: Quote: similarities and differences on important topics for developers Go learning C#.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: I explain my motivation and experience learning Go coming I read that as:
Quote: I explain my motivation and experience learning Go comically I kid you not. I obviously clicked on the link with a pre-bias.
I had to quickly reach for the barf bag -- my mask wasn't big enough. Why in the world would I want to learn Go? It looks like a mashup between C++ and TypeScript and bad JavaScript.
Look, one of the reasons I love C# is because I find the language syntax itself beautiful and aesthetically pleasing. Yes, programmers can turn any work of art into a bucket of bloody body parts, but that's not the language's fault.
Go, well, it looks like what is in the bucket.
|
|
|
|
|
If it ain’t broke, spend millions of dollars fixing it anyway. And it proceeded to crash into the back of a glass of milk
|
|
|
|
|
Sort of dejà vou:
Only because you can doesn't necessarily mean that you should.
If that money would have been invested somewhere else...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: That said, I'm not giving up my hard earned cash to some corrupt African country so that a rich president can become even richer I never said we should... but another thing is waste it with non-sense.
As many of the so-called-studies that get published all around... and not only in tech-areas.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: but another thing is waste it with non-sense Like said make-up?
Or action figures?
Or video games?
Or yet another Hollywood movie / Netflix series?
Or going into outer space?
Or the biggest nonsense of all, weaponry?
Probably, when you're starving, everything that isn't water or food or housing is pretty much nonsense
|
|
|
|
|
Sander Rossel wrote: That said, I'm not giving up my hard earned cash to some corrupt African country so that a rich president can become even richer
Some kind person has sent me an email saying that one of them has died and, if I give him my bank details, I can share the late lamented's money.
|
|
|
|
|
|
With C++20 Modules on the horizon the compiler needs to work closely with project systems in order to provide rich information for build dependency gathering and making iterative builds faster for inner-loop development. I depend on you, but I guess that doesn't count?
|
|
|
|
|
Only because you can doesn't necessarily mean that you should...
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Get ready for some major speed boosts. Are they ARMed for battle?
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: Are they ARMed for battle? Yes, but they only will go ahead if they get the right INTELligence reports
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft has launched a new website that shows off its open-source credentials. "Open source is an intellectual-property destroyer, 'I can't imagine something that could be worse than this for the software business and the intellectual-property business"
Whatever happened to Jim Allchin?
oh, right: Allchin retired in early 2007 when Microsoft officially released the Windows Vista operating system to consumers
|
|
|
|
|
Microsoft is trying to make Windows 10 more friendly for users who need to know about new features in major updates. "Stuff"
At least that's how Apple publishes theirs
|
|
|
|
|
Kent Sharkey wrote: "Stuff" Man, are you nice...
I would have said "crap" in your place
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
How to choose the right database
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Since each query is done on a table — the query execution time depends on the size of the table. This is a significant limitation that requires us to keep our tables relatively small and perform optimizations on our DB in order to scale.
In relational DBs scaling is done by adding more computing power to the machine that holds your DB, this method is called ‘Vertical Scaling’.
Clearly the author has never heard of indexing.
|
|
|
|
|
I must admit that the same sentence jumped out at me too when I first read it. I thought they may have been referring to something else, as that's exactly what indexes are for.
"There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult." - C.A.R. Hoare
Home | LinkedIn | Google+ | Twitter
|
|
|
|
|
Indexing, query optimizer, primary keys, foreign relationships, ... it's all so much 80-ies and 90-ies - when you had to deal with hundreds of millions of records and you were lucky if you had a server with a gig of RAM. One of the projects my company dealing with have a server pre-requisite for 256Gb!!! RAM (not a hard drive) - I guess it's because it was programmed by the guys that at some point lost their developer jobs and now writing articles like that one.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm a fan of a game called "Oxygen not included"; for a long time, it included the name "pokeshell molt" for two different items. It may be new to the developers that humans need a "unique" name to differentiate between the two. If they named the same and show up in a list, then you can only make a choice by trial-and-error.
One of the basics of databases when learning what a primary key is
Bastard Programmer from Hell
If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Marc's complaint is only #2 on my facepalm list.
#1 is the cheatsheet at the end. It says to use any of several specialist NoSQL databases if you're doing the workload they're hyper-optimized for. So far so good, if a little bit obvious. But for anything else use either a relational DB or a generalist NoSQL DB (document) which is an absolute give up for the one case where someone with a minimally functioning brain would need to consider what the best option for their workload is.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason?
Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful?
--Zachris Topelius
Training a telescope on one’s own belly button will only reveal lint. You like that? You go right on staring at it. I prefer looking at galaxies.
-- Sarah Hoyt
|
|
|
|