|
That's exactly my point. SUS is not for win98.
Is anyone interested in testing a Win98 solution?
Neil
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all.. I'm having a big problem.. And Hope someone can help me.
The OS on my labtop is Window 2000.
I turn on the computer and the user name is " Po Po", which is in the group of administrators.
Whenever I haven't use the computer for long time, it turn off and asking me to enter the password like " this computer is locked by Administrator. please enter the password to unlock the computer" something like it.. But I dont' know the password.. so everytime I got that message requesting the password, I restart the computer.
Last night after working on my Laptop, I went to Control Panel and open the Users and Passwords. Inside of Users for this computer window, I found 3 users; Administrator, guest, and Po Po.
I tried to reset the password for "Po Po" but I couldn't since I dont' know the old password. There is no password for either Administrator or guest..
Then I deleted Po Po. So I don't have to login as this user but Administrator. I was thinking of able to click on Cancel button when the computer restart if I login as Administrator because there is no password for Administrator.
And I restart the computer..
The login window pops up..
I typed in "Administrator" as User and I click OK button . The cancel button is still gray (disable).
But it didn't let me into the OS.. I'm keep getting the message saying "the user or password is incorrect.. "
I have important documents saved in my c:\. I dont' want to format my harddrive and reintall Window 2000. I dont' have the backup for those documents.
Is there anyway to crash the password to login to Win 2000 without reinstalling it???
Thank You
|
|
|
|
|
Just did a quick google and came up with:-
http://www.annoyances.org/exec/forum/win2000/r1050428859[^]
From post in XP forum. Use the second portion of this if you do not have access to the internet on another machine or cannot get the disks the first part talks about. There is a boot disk you can download at: http://home.eunet.no/~pnordahl/ntpasswd/bootdisk.html that will let you reset the password of any account on NT4, Windows2000 or XP. Just follow all the default settings which are for the admin account. Used it many times with great success. I also made a bootable CD image you can download from http://www.onecomputerguy.com/software/ntpassword.iso Bob Cerelli http://www.onecomputerguy.com
If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants. - Isaac Newton 1676
|
|
|
|
|
I just installed a DSL line for a lady who also has a dialup account; she wants to keep it as a backup service. Win98 is supposed to support this, hence the setting 'Dial only if Network Connection not Available.' I've never tried this before - most customers can't wait to abandon their dalup connections once the DSL service is available - but clicked the option and hoped for the best. It doesn't work. I disconnected the DSL line then tried to search for a website (CP coincidentally), and all Win98 could do is report a DNS error. It dutifully search for my settings, looked for a proxy (not in use) then failed without even attempting to dial the default dialup connection. Has anyone ever seen this work? Is there a fix?
BTW - The ISP is Sprint, and their setup software forces you to set up an Earthlink account, then fails to create a dialup connection for it.
"Welcome to Arizona! Drive Nice - We're Armed..." - Proposed Sign at CA/AZ Border
|
|
|
|
|
When I dial up my connection, I get the following event in my system log:
The IPSEC Services service terminated with the following error: <br />
The attempted operation is not supported for the type of object referenced.
Has anyone seen this. Searches on the net have proved fruitless for a solution.
|
|
|
|
|
I wanted to try out one of those starter kits on the asp.net website, but it told me I had to download MSDN...
So I did....
and when I click on the 'setup.exe' it comes up with a message box that say...
"A strong SA password is required for security reasons.
Please use SAPWD switch to supply the same. Refer to
readme for more details. Setup will now exit."
I checked the readme, but of course there's nothing there...
What is the solution???
/\ |_ E X E GG
/\ |_ E X E GG
|
|
|
|
|
It sounds like you need a strong SA password for security reasons.
Paul
Garfield.Bark();<br />
---Configuration: garfield - Win32 Deworm---<br />
C:\garfield.cpp(9) : error C2039: 'Bark' : is not a member of 'CCat'<br />
modified 18-Jul-18 11:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
No kidding! To the original poster, in the setup.ini file, add
SAPWD=somepassword and run setup again. Read the README file (HTML file) for instructions about installing and customing the installation process. In practice, always read the README files for information before installing or compiling anything, unless you know previous what you're doing exactly.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
We have a program that was written using Visual Basic, which has been working fine for 2 years on Win95/98/Me/NT4/NT2000. It does work properly when run on XP as anyone other than the adminstrator. The program generates a tab delimited file which stores user defined information as to how the software is to carry out some of its' taskes. How ever on XP when the user saves the data it is not saved, because the user does not have write pemission, in the directory where the program is located.
How do I stop XP security from denying our software the right to update its' own data file.
INTP
|
|
|
|
|
XP and secure??? kewl...
Don't try it, just do it!
|
|
|
|
|
By default, users (i.e. accounts that are part of the Users group) are not allowed to write into the Program Files folder.
You could make your users into Power Users (who do have permission), or you could change the permissions on the directory or, ideally, just the file so that the Users group has permission to write to this file.
XP doesn't show the old security tab in the Properties box by default (when not connected to a domain) - to get it back, see http://www2.goldfisch.at/knowledge/241[^].
User preferences should really be stored in the registry or in the user's Local Settings or Application Data folders.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks!
The problem is that the User may be anyone that purchases our hardware (directly of indirectly). We (may) have no control of the End User and most of them may not even realize the file actualy exist. All the End User will know is that it did not save their information. The file could conceivably contain several hundred entries.
INTP
|
|
|
|
|
Hmm, in that case it sounds like a job for your setup tool. See the documentation for the SetNamedSecurityInfo function.
Good coverage of security APIs in Programming Server-Side Applications for Windows 2000[^] and also in Programming Windows Security[^].
Specifically you need to give at least write access to the Users group. You'll need to look up the Security Identifier (SID) for the Users group on the local computer (see LookupAccountName ). However, your customer's administrator could potentially have renamed the Users group, in which case this won't work. A well-known SID such as the Authenticated Users or Interactive SID might work better.
Please tell me you're not using the Package and Deployment Wizard - it's rather painful to add a custom install step, IIRC.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks! It looks like I now have a better chance at solving the problem.
No I am not using the Package and Deployment Wizard.
"Live long an prosper."
INTP
|
|
|
|
|
|
My new computer has XP Home Edition but doesn't seem to have IIS. What does it take to install IIS onto the new computer (upgrade the OS, download service pack)? Does IIS even work on XP Home Edition?
Click here to see my articles and software tools
|
|
|
|
|
The Home Edition does not support any webserver (Q304197[^], but the Pro version includes IIS5.1. Considering what a waste of bits the Home version is, I'd upgrade as fast as possible.
"Welcome to Arizona! Drive Nice - We're Armed..." - Proposed Sign at CA/AZ Border
|
|
|
|
|
|
XP Home doesn't support IIS but there is a hack that you can use if you have an XP Pro or 2000 (Pro or Server) CD. Basically you just replace the iis.dll and iis.inf that are installed with home and modify some other inf files. If you google XP Home IIS you should be able to find the original how-to.
Matt Newman Sonork: 100:11179
"Jokes should at least try to be intelligent - this is just toilet humor" - Heath Stewart
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your advice. I finally got IIS running on my XP Home machine.
Go to my home page
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
I heard a lot about accessing any computer if it is connected via the Internet. So I’m worry about the secret information in my computer ! especially when every one say that WinXP have more problem in Security !
Could any one tell me please how this is possible even if I did not make any share folder on my computer ?
Dose any one know a good articles about this subjects ?
Thanks very much
|
|
|
|
|
bfadi wrote:
every one say that WinXP have more problem in Security
I haven't heard that at all. WinXP is more security conscious than previous versions, though I have no doubt that a serious hacker can probably find a way into any PC. XP makes it harder (it's hard enough for a legitimate user to make it work), and you as an individual are not much of a target for hackers.
If you are not sharing any files or devices on your PC it would be very difficult for anyone to get in, if it's possible at all. I don't personally know of any way to do so. One good bit of insurance is a firewall; a hardware device is better, but more expensive than a software firewall. ZoneAlarm Pro and Sygate Personal Firewall Pro are two I've used, and both are excellent. Search Google for download sites.
If you're curious about how exposed you might be to the outside world while connected to the Internet, there's a quick and dirty scanner available at www.grc.com[^] which will scan your PC and report any ports or services found on it. Once you identify a vulnerability you can research methods for closing the gate to outsiders.
If you're not on a network, just using the PC for personal pleasure, you should remove or disable any services you don't need. Using the Services applet in Control Panel you can temporarily disable various things to see how the computer behaves, and customize a configuration that allows only the operations you need and want. It's a bit risky, though, so it's advisable to save your system configuration before making each change, allowing you to restore your previous settings if something you change really messes things up.
Keep in mind, though, that as an individual user your aren't likely to be targeted by hackers, and your secret information is of little value to anyone else. Unless you have enemies looking to do you harm, I wouldn't lose any sleep over this.
"Welcome to Arizona! Drive Nice - We're Armed..." - Proposed Sign at CA/AZ Border
|
|
|
|
|
It is possible if they have administrative privileges using the hidden shares like C$ (for the entire C drive), etc. However, if they somehow got administrative privileges on your computer (which would requires a series of hacks anyway) they probably could do a lot better things than accessing your shares.
It's true that most "hackers" (the media is stupid, the correct term is "crackers" and "phreaks") probably won't target an individual's files, but they will try to gain elevated priveleges if possible to launch additional attacks, such as DDoS attacks.
XP is more secure, though, so long as you keep up-to-date with Windows Updates (use the automatic download if always connected, or use the Tools->Windows Update command from IE often). No OS (even linux, despite what those junkies always say) is secure all the time. Even security specialists in the field (like Bruce Schneier) will tell you that nothing's uncrackable - it's only a matter of time. Just make your computer as secure as you can, keep up-to-date on patches, and don't worry so much because it's not as large a problem as the stupid media (and linux junkies when attacking Microsoft because they're successful and linux isn't) makes it.
PS: This isn't an attack again linux - it has it's uses and I enjoy it for certain purposes since no OS is perfect for every problem / solution. It's just the propaganda that its primary users spew-forth!
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.21
GCS/G/MU d- s: a- C++++ UL@ P++(+++) L+(--) E--- W+++ N++ o+ K? w++++ O- M(+) V? PS-- PE Y++ PGP++ t++@ 5 X+++ R+@ tv+ b(-)>b++ DI++++ D+ G e++>+++ h---* r+++ y+++
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
|
|
|
|
|
I have windows 2000 professional and a week ago my tooltips disappeared. Even when I hove over the clock it doesnt show the date
my default registry looks like
9e 3e 00 80
can someone please help
|
|
|
|
|
the girlfriends laptop has a problem with the modem basically it's this,
If you try to connect to the internet the report comes back that there are two errors found on the modem. The modem makes no noises and it doesn't make any odds if the lead is attached to the modem and connected to the phone socket or not.
If you then go to the control panel in win 2k and do a query on the modem everything reports as fine. The modem is installed and it answers the query reponses.
The problem is that because win 2k says that everything is fine with the moment I am hesitant to tell her to get a new modem in case it doesn't fix the problem. But having said that it seems apparent that if windows thinks everything is O.K. with the modem then I'm wondering if it could be a software problem.
There's also the problem that she isn't exactly well off so having to buy a new modem is quite an expense for her ( I gave her the laptop but she would insist on paying to replace the modem card as from her point of view it was her who broke it ) So for that reason I'd hate to tell her to get a new modem only to find that the problem hadn't gone away.
Thoughts?
pseudonym67
Neural Dot Net Articles 1-11 Start Here[^]
|
|
|
|