|
I suspect it'll be pushed to my Surface, and will run just fine.
But my desktop doesn't have the security hardware, so that'll either stay on 10 or have to be replaced.
The decision will depend on how much hassle I get from it on the surface, I guess. I'm not going to want to spend the dosh to replace the desktop just to get a start button in the middle of my taskbar ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
... I've switched to fedora 34 and I'm loving it on my main machine, running Windows 7 in Virtual Box for .net stuff when needed (Win7 uses less resources and works with VS2019).
Exception up = new Exception("Something is really wrong.");
throw up;
|
|
|
|
|
Win98 - ok
Millenium - skip
WinXP - ok
Vista - skip
Win7 - ok
Win8 - no comment (yes... skip!!!!)
Win10 - ok
... So guess, what's the best idea for win11?
|
|
|
|
|
|
To make this "every second version" myth appear to be true, you have to close your eyes every now and then.
And also to tell stories about "bad" versions that is confirmed by a lot of people who never used these versions, but have heard a lot of rumours about how "bad" those versions were, so it simply must be true that they were bad, regardless of what the people tell who have used it. (They just refuse to admit that they made a wrong choice using those versions, and try to cover it by making false claims about stability.)
|
|
|
|
|
And NT?
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
"Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
|
|
|
|
|
well, back in those days, there were "two" windows versions - those for companies (NT3.51, 2k, etc) - They got merged later on (today's windows still based on NT kernel)
but the private, "home" versions were 95,98,Millenium. With XP they were "one" as far as I can remember.
I may be wrong, it's been a long time since then.
|
|
|
|
|
With the exception of Vista (which was cr@p), I have tried all of the Windows versions from WIN 3.1 onwards.
I beg to differ regarding Windows ME. I found it quite stable. It may have helped that the shop I worked at was an almost completely Microsoft shop (with the exception of a few people who swore by the Borland C++ compiler...)
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: I beg to differ regarding Windows ME. I found it quite stable.
I'm fairly certain we are the only two people who think that. On my Pc it was faster than Win98 too.
GCS d--(d-) s-/++ a C++++ U+++ P- L+@ E-- W++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah - that's the general rule I've lived by since the Win 3.1 days. NT4 and Win2K were rock solid.
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music."
-- Marcus Brigstocke, British Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe Microsoft has learnt its lessons from the past, and this is indeed a good release.
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, that's funny. Microsoft learning its lesson! Yeah, when cows fly.
It might be a pretty good rule to skip every other version but I'm still going to give it a try. It's a free upgrade. I don't think it's going to differ all that much from Win10.
|
|
|
|