|
This blog is from PVS-Studio. It's a good static analysis tool with a free trial, but I don't know what the policy is on this kind of thing. If it's acceptable, it has some formatting issues.
- CodeProject[^]
It's gone now. I guess it's not acceptable.
|
|
|
|
|
I held off on this article, which got published anyway. Now it's been revised, and I still don't know whether to approve it:
LXUI.NET - Compact Cross-Platform GUI Framework - Part 2[^]
It is a framework with no download, and the GitHub repository only contains tests. I thought I found a DLL when I was looking at it the last time, but no source code. I don't know if the code is private or commercial, but someone else should look into this.
|
|
|
|
|
I've previously emailed him about hosting the full source. Now I remove the article until the source arrives.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed. Many of these have since been deleted. If you see anything else of this nature please feel free to flag it as unclear or incomplete or extremely poor quality.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the feedback! Will do that.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
Richard MacCutchan replied to my question in the forum C/C++ MFC question "Re: Can GDI and RichEdit share the WindowClient (and live together)"
I got the notification via e-mail however the reply wasn't on the message board at least I didnt see it when going there
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
I've noticed a lot of really poor QA questions recently which have been up-voted by a low to medium rep user.
The latest example is: How do I solve this problem in C[^]
I don't know how easy it is to check who's up-voting this dross, to see if there's anything suspicious going on?
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined."
- Homer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the catch! The local copy of the source code has been added.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
Awesome catch. Thank you very much!
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
For example Serializing MailMessage with MimeKit - Introduction[^] is saying Quote: This is an old version of the currently published project. Are they really trying to rollback - if so should this be moderated or is there an actual problem with the site?
Will cross post reference only into Bugs & Sugs
|
|
|
|
|
Member 14953681 above 200 answers in 2 questions !
visual basic[^]
Visual Basic[^]
Patrice
“Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Albert Einstein
|
|
|
|
|
I read:
Quote: Project definition: A Project is a code repository imported from a service such as GitHub, BitBucket or Visual Studio online. The repository must have a README file for it to be considered for import, and must adhere to the usual editorial guidelines for articles.
But I see following projects already published (and have come across similar few more in edit/approve queue). Either I am missing something on why they are approved or some how they sneaked in.
SDL
EDT Text Editor
SMU
Help me close the gap here.
|
|
|
|
|
Currently these are closed. Looking at their revision history I'm not sure they were ever live, but may not have been displaying properly as closed?
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Yesterday it was in queue and they were revised version of already published projects. Thus the query and confusion.
Again, this was not first time. I will share once I see something similar again. Thanks Sean.
|
|
|
|
|
A new one in queue for approval that is already published: - CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
The Project was Closed, but I've taken it a step further and deleted it.
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article is : MajorRAT[^]
Take another close look at what this is about and the function list. There are items like open second backdoor, activate key logger, and see victims desktop live. While potentially useful, this looks rather malicious to me. Incomplete or not, should this even be here?
While you're at it, have a look this user's contributions. Hint - there are none.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
There is something I am curious about that I have noticed in Intel's postings. They all say, "for our sponsors at CodeProject." That can't possibly be true. Why would CodeProject sponsor a multi-billon dollar company?
Isn't it the other way around? Isn't Intel a sponsor of CodeProject?
My apologies if I have posted this before and forgotten.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
I understand it the other way around: it may be that Intel is a sponsor of CP.
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
That is my understanding. Hence the question.
"They have a consciousness, they have a life, they have a soul! Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses! Save our brothers! Can I get an amen?"
|
|
|
|
|
We're just really, really generous.
You mean this line:
Quote: This article is in the Product Showcase section for our sponsors at CodeProject
If this is the case then how about the less mind bending
Quote: This article is posted as a Product Showcase on behalf of our sponsors
cheers
Chris Maunder
|
|
|
|