|
Wow, such a narrow view of AI! It is not only for use in chatbots you know? And I agree with you, a chatbot is NOT where I want an AI, at least on healthcare.
By supervising AI, I meant essentially a cooperation to help on decision, and facilitate work, as opposed to an AI that makes the decision alone and rolls on the result without human input/overview.
For scan for example, when checking for cancer, if the AI can point you directly to where it thinks there are cancer cells. If it is correct, it saves a lot of time for the specialist, in that he does not have to review the entire scan and can quickly say yes, there is cancer. And there are a lot of other diseases where it can point directly to areas of interest, saving time for positive diagnosis.
That's only for the negative ones that you may want the human to check the scan anyway, depending on the level of confidence you have. I guess if your confidence is low enough then yes, it may save no time at all. But only if the AI finds nothing.
Having an AI showing the specialist where areas of interest are can also reduce errors by the human who sometimes can pay less attention, glass over too many scans to review. That's where a good cooperation between human and AI is more productive and efficient than either taken separately.
|
|
|
|
|
Better yet
Human and AIs both scan ALL images independently.
If they disagree on diagnosis, then you go to a tie breaker. Worse case, it might require follow up imaging.
|
|
|
|
|
Elrond wrote: Wow, such a narrow view of AI That's your petty opinion.
Elrond wrote: And I agree with you, a chatbot is NOT where I want an AI, at least on healthcare. No you don't. Chatting is where they do least damage.
Elrond wrote: By supervising AI, I meant essentially Oh, dear..
Elrond wrote: For scan for example, when checking for cancer, if the AI can point you directly to where it thinks there are cancer cells. If it is correct "If". Humans hit that if more often.
Elrond wrote: That's only for the negative ones that you may want the human to check the scan anyway, depending on the level of confidence you have. I guess if your confidence is low enough then yes, it may save no time at all. But only if the AI finds nothing. You a lot of faith. Not only, always.
Elrond wrote: Having an AI showing the specialist where areas of interest are can also reduce errors I pointed out the area of interest; they made pictures without AI.
Your confidence and trust are admirable, but if you were a son o' mine I'd hit you. Rather hard, so you'd never forget. You can be naive all you want.
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
I do think I was naive now. But for a different reason.
Quote: I'd hit you. Rather hard,
That sums it up.
|
|
|
|
|
That's a nice selective quote.. People raise kids with different values, and that has nothing to do with this topic at all
Bastard Programmer from Hell
"If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: Indications and contra-indications should be based on logic, not 90% certainty of AI lol! My (bad) experience is: We are not sure so we apply a coctail for whatever it could be ....
|
|
|
|
|
Our so-called "AI" was nothing more than a glorified switch(...) block, with if-then-else thrown in for good measure.
"Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music."
-- Marcus Brigstocke, British Comedian
|
|
|
|
|
I answered the question as to what i think the AI has use for in general (IMHO).
|
|
|
|
|
Same. The question says how would I use it, not how do I use it.
So I pretty much just picked every answer as I could see AI being used successfully in them all.
|
|
|
|
|
... in business applications is a customer call transcriber to document the interaction, if anybody has made one.
Exception up = new Exception("Something is really wrong.");
throw up;
|
|
|
|
|