|
Well, watching a game from a seat in the stadium and watching the same game on TV are most definitely not equivalent. Watching on TV shows you what is happening but you just don't have anything like the experience that the whole immersion in the stadium atmosphere brings.
So going to space and seeing it through a telescope are quite different things - ask any astronaut!
|
|
|
|
|
My point is you're not going to be close enough to anything aside from earth and the moon to really see anything you couldn't see through a telescope, and at roughly the same level of remove, even if it is from orbit or something.
Aside from that, I'm not really interested in floating. It seems inconvenient.
Check out my IoT graphics library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx
And my IoT UI/User Experience library here:
https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
|
|
|
|
|
honey the codewitch wrote: Aside from that, I'm not really interested in floating. It seems inconvenient.
Yes. Agreed. Even though microgravity can be fun, it is inconvenient. You can experience microgravity while flying in a plane by pushing the yoke forward into a dive. It's all fun and games until you need to pull out of that dive and all the junk in the cockpit comes crashing down. It creates a huge mess! I'd always lose my pen.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. Absolutely. But only for a short time.
There are risks if one stays up there for extended periods.
Our brains, bones, eyes, heart, DNA, etc, seem to prefer gravity.
"A little time, a little trouble, your better day"
Badfinger
|
|
|
|
|
Well I'm glad somebody finally said "yes" ... I was beginning to lose faith in the developer community 
|
|
|
|
|
Would like to go to an inner space, full of peace, away from the din and bustle of the external world.
|
|
|
|
|
If the spaceships were more like in the films instead of what we actually have... yes, definitivelly.
With our current technology... not really.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like to experience micro-gravity (for more than the fractions of seconds that one feels when one jumps), but otherwise the current state of the art is much too primitive.
If we had drives that could take us around the Solar System in a few days, I'd love to see Jupiter and Saturn close up. If we had faster-than--light warp drives, there are astronomical sights I'd love to see with the naked eye.
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: I'd like to experience micro-gravity (for more than the fractions of seconds that one feels when one jumps)
When I was in training to be an airline pilot, I discovered microgravity. I'd climb to an altitude of 13,000 ft AGL. Then, I'd push the yoke forward and put the plane into a dive. It took some practice to get it right. Sometimes I would dive too steeply and everything in the cockpit would fly up and stick to the ceiling. Other times, my dive wouldn't be enough to achieve a state of microgravity. Once you go it right, though? It's really cool! I've never actually timed it, but I estimate that I've experienced microgravity for about up to 25 seconds or so at a time. It's just like what you see on videos of astronauts playing with things in low earth orbit. I remember watching my car keys float up into the air. They'd float in one spot and rotate slowly just like it would be in orbit. Then, you'd eventually have to pull out of the dive, and everything that was floating falls to the floor. It makes a huge mess when that happens. There were some heavy items you'd have to bring along while flying. The FAA Regulations book was the size of a dictionary. I was fortunate enough to avoid it hitting me while pulling out of a dive. I'd always lose my pen, which was annoying. Microgravity is fun, but if you experience enough of it, I've found that it loses its luster. As long as there was the novelty aspect to it, it was a lot of fun. Either way, I'm still not fond of being within a mile of thousands of gallons of liquid hydrogen. That's some f***ed up s***.
|
|
|
|
|
There's also NASA's "vomit comet". AIUI, they place the plane in a climb, turn off the engines, and get about 10 minutes of microgravity before they have to turn the engines on again. It doesn't sound very safe, but compared to sitting on top of hundreds of thousands of litres of burning liquid hydrogen and oxygen... 
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: about 10 minutes of microgravity
Oh hell no.
ChatGPT says 20-25 seconds.
Space says 25 seconds ("How it works" section, near the bottom).
Live Science also says 20-25 seconds.
Even Wikipedia says 25 seconds.
Any plane with its engines stopped won't experience 10 minutes of freefall, no matter what altitude it reaches. Gliding, sure, but you won't reach zero-G while doing that.
|
|
|
|
|
I sit corrected. 
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows.
-- 6079 Smith W.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: I sit corrected. 
You mean, you float in mid-air corrected?
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe when the technology improves, Aircraft still use Bird technology, Rockets use Balloon technology.
|
|
|
|
|
Daniel Pfeffer wrote: If we had drives that could take us around the Solar System in a few days, I'd love to see Jupiter and Saturn close up. If we had faster-than--light warp drives, there are astronomical sights I'd love to see with the naked eye.
If we could travel across the solar system in days, that would definitely be more than enough incentive for me to travel into to space. This is why I find special relativity to be depressing. Then, we have quantum mechanics. If any two subatomic particles are in a state of entanglement, then a change in the quantum state of one particle immediately changes the quantum state of the other, regardless of what the distance is between the two subatomic particles. From what I understand, everything without mass only travels at the speed of light. If something has mass, it can only travel a tiny fraction of light speed. What would happen if we were to "turn-off" mass at the quantum level? If that could be done, then travel at the speed of light could be a real possibility. In terms of how acceleration dilates/contracts time? I haven't come up with any guesses. The more acceleration an object has in relation to another, the greater the difference in the speed of time becomes. If I could travel across the solar system in a matter of days, the length of time that elapses back on Earth in relation to the rate of time I experience would be greatly accelerated. That means my loved ones back on Earth would grow old and die in a couple of months. I know that's depressing, but I take solace in the fact that I have no understanding and knowledge about how the universe actually works. I hope someday that we'll be able to travel at speeds greater than the speed of light while somehow eliminating time dilation/contraction. Who knows what's possible, right?
|
|
|
|
|
I already am in space.
But, seriously, I have trouble on Space Mountain these days.
|
|
|
|
|
lots of folks were Spaced Out back in the 60's.
I would probably not fly in a craft made up of thousands of parts purchased via low bid.
>64
It’s weird being the same age as old people. Live every day like it is your last; one day, it will be.
|
|
|
|
|
f*ck yeah.
real space, not just low orbit stunts.
CI/CD = Continuous Impediment/Continuous Despair
|
|
|
|
|
Nah, why would I, I don't know anyone there.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, and I don't even mind that the current technology isn't sofa-ready.
Software Zen: delete this;
|
|
|
|
|
I would. In the future it may be no big deal, but in our lifetimes not many people do. Would be a joy to experience something so rare.
Jeremy Falcon
|
|
|
|
|
|
The whole idea seems very cool.
Zero grav.
Seeing the earth from above.
Seeing the universe from our atmosphere.
The science of it.
Call me a whimp, but the idea of "using the bathroom" in zero gravity scares me off the idea.
|
|
|
|
|
For a while, I would have wanted to go to Mars, but not anymore. There are the dangers - radiation, collisions with micro thingies, the risk of missing the target or supply vessels missing it, and so on. But the main problem for me probably would be spending the eight month journey going there, with 3 other people in a very small capsule. Ouch! And according to one of the moon landers, there tends to be a certain smell after a while.
That being said, I have asked my wife it she would allow me to go, and she said yes.
Should humans go to Mars at all? I don't think so, but I certainly hope we do. Before I figuratively leave Earth ( close to 70 now).
pibbuR who still would like to go to the moon. To for a short while be as far from Norway as possible.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd love to go to space for a visit. And by space I don't mean on the BO phallic rocket. I mean to orbit or further.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
