|
Paul van der Walt wrote:
No more tears
I take it means you solved it. If so can you explain how.
My initial thoughts would have been that your NIC(s) were set to full duplex while your switch was set to half (or is that the other way around) which is causing huge amounts of collisions. Did you make a change on the switch or NIC?
Michael Martin
Australia
"I suspect I will be impressed though, I am easy."
- Paul Watson 21/09/2003
|
|
|
|
|
A surprisingly low-tech solution actually: as it turns out, the WinMX fileshare client is rather heavy on network resources
Paul
That demands capital punishment!! Death by a herd of marauding Bobs! - Ryan Binns
modified 18-Jul-18 11:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
wrong forum!
Don't try it, just do it!
|
|
|
|
|
Wrong retort
Paul
That demands capital punishment!! Death by a herd of marauding Bobs! - Ryan Binns
modified 18-Jul-18 11:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
This Alexander guy seems to have a problem with you
Matt Newman
If you chose to continue this discussion, I am fully prepared to make you my bitch. I invite you to ask around, and you'll find out that I'm quite capable of doing so - John Simmons on Trolls
|
|
|
|
|
i don't have problems with anyone...
Don't try it, just do it!
|
|
|
|
|
Alexander M. wrote:
i don't have problems with anyone...
I've been reviewing your posts in all the forums, and that seems to be true. You appear to have a problem with everyone, not anyone. I'd like to slam you for your inexcusably rude behavior here, but I can't - you have posted some really valuable stuff which has helped a lot of people, and that's what this site is all about. Good job!
I encourage you to continue your valuable contributions to this site - you're an asset to us, without a doubt. But keep in mind that there are many of us who are here to learn, and your childish attempts at humiliating people are not helpful to anyone. We don't want to lose your obvious expertise, but we can certainly do without your obnoxious posts that attack our long-time members.
Cool it, kid, and let yourself be assimilated. We're a nice bunch, and it wont hurt a bit...
"Your village called - They're missing their idiot."
|
|
|
|
|
Well said!
Matt Newman
If you chose to continue this discussion, I am fully prepared to make you my bitch. I invite you to ask around, and you'll find out that I'm quite capable of doing so - John Simmons on Trolls
|
|
|
|
|
I guess that correspondence course in Tact was worth the effort...
"Your village called - They're missing their idiot."
|
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to set up my PC to be accessible from the internet, but haven't had any luck so far. On my router (NAT) I've got port tcp3389 forwarding to my computer, but when I try and connect from the outside I get a vague error. Are there any other ports that need forwarding too, or am I missing something else? Suggestions? TIA
Paul
That demands capital punishment!! Death by a herd of marauding Bobs! - Ryan Binns
modified 18-Jul-18 11:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
wrong forum again, please leave!
Don't try it, just do it!
|
|
|
|
|
Where do you suggest I post a question about Terminal Services? To the best of my knowledge the SysAdmin is the best place to post a question about administering a terminal services server... or not?
Paul
That demands capital punishment!! Death by a herd of marauding Bobs! - Ryan Binns
modified 18-Jul-18 11:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
Ignore it, Paul. This is the right forum for anything related to system issues, and the closest thing we've got to a general PC OS/hardware/networking forum. It's evolved over the years into a broader scope than I think Chris originally intended, but these things tend to have a life of their own.
BTW - What port is the outside computer using to contact yours? Http, Ftp, and Telnet all have default ports they use, and there may some additional mapping you need to do in your NAT device to enable the port used for TS from incoming packets. Some devices also need to be configured for specific traffic types - TCP, UDP, ICMP, etc.
"Your village called - They're missing their idiot."
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Wright wrote:
Ignore it, Paul
Yah, no problem
Roger Wright wrote:
What port is the outside computer using to contact yours?
Well, two ports are mapped, and to different computers. I've got tcp80 mapped to my webserver, where I've got a web-based terminal services client running (I don't think it's the hassle), and I've got tcp3389 (specified on NAT on router) mapped to my pc, which is the terminal services port. All the documents I've found on internet seem to suggest that 3389 is the only port you need.
Paul
That demands capital punishment!! Death by a herd of marauding Bobs! - Ryan Binns
modified 18-Jul-18 11:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
Paul van der Walt wrote:
All the documents I've found on internet seem to suggest that 3389 is the only port you need.
I've done it with just 3389
Matt Newman
If you chose to continue this discussion, I am fully prepared to make you my bitch. I invite you to ask around, and you'll find out that I'm quite capable of doing so - John Simmons on Trolls
|
|
|
|
|
Strange, that doesn't seem to work for me
Paul
That demands capital punishment!! Death by a herd of marauding Bobs! - Ryan Binns
modified 18-Jul-18 11:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
Try a
telnet your.machine.ip.address 3389
This will help to detect if the problem is with the connection or with Terminal Services itself.
Trying to make bits uncopyable is like trying to make water not wet.
-- Bruce Schneier
By the way, dog_spawn isn't a nickname - it is my name with an underscore instead of a space. -- dog_spawn
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Daniel, sorry about the long delay - the notification email must've got lost in the woodwork somewhere
The problem is definitely not with the TS server, seeing I can connect on my local network. I haven't had a chance to test yet, but I've changed it to another port, because maybe it is as Matt suggested that the ISP blocks that port.
Thanks
Paul
Open the fridge door, scream, and everything that doesn't run into the corner is safe for eating. - Jörgen Sigvardsson
modified 18-Jul-18 11:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
Does your computer have a firewall, and double check that remote desktop is enabled (I've made this mistake before
Matt Newman
If you chose to continue this discussion, I am fully prepared to make you my bitch. I invite you to ask around, and you'll find out that I'm quite capable of doing so - John Simmons on Trolls
|
|
|
|
|
The software firewall is configured correctly, because I can log in via the LAN. It's only when I try and log in via internet that it doesn't work. (The hardware firewall is turned off at the moment.)
Thanks for the response
Paul
That demands capital punishment!! Death by a herd of marauding Bobs! - Ryan Binns
modified 18-Jul-18 11:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
Its an outside chance, but maybe your ISP is blocking the port. Other than that I don't know
Matt Newman
If you chose to continue this discussion, I am fully prepared to make you my bitch. I invite you to ask around, and you'll find out that I'm quite capable of doing so - John Simmons on Trolls
|
|
|
|
|
Could be, but I don't think so. I've managed to use lots of other things... (like vnc, webserver, ftp etc), and AFAIK my ISP doesn't block anything.
Paul
That demands capital punishment!! Death by a herd of marauding Bobs! - Ryan Binns
modified 18-Jul-18 11:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
Paul van der Walt wrote:
I get a vague error.
What, exactly, is the error? Alternatively, you could just email me your IP address and all your passwords and I'll check it myself.
"Your village called - They're missing their idiot."
|
|
|
|
|
Sure, you're welcome to test it I'll email details, sans password though
Paul
That demands capital punishment!! Death by a herd of marauding Bobs! - Ryan Binns
modified 18-Jul-18 11:59am.
|
|
|
|
|
I know this has been mentioned but I would check with your ISP to make sure they aren't blocking that port. Some ISP's were doing it because of the RPC worm. My ISP blocks the Exchange port now because of this
I know you said you have a router so do you have more then 1 PC? If so does it work inside the firewall? 3389 Is the only post you need to route to get it to work. Mine is set up this way.
|
|
|
|