|
Oshtri Deka wrote: When I started to work for my current employer, subversion was a great discovery for me.
Same here. Discovered it at current employer. Prior to that it's mostly been SourceSafe.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
What about Mercurial? - http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/
or GIT?
Both are used by some of the biggest Open source projects including the Linux Kernel
|
|
|
|
|
I have used this on the linux side using the text commands mainly to pull stuff down from .git servers. Are you using this under windows? Is there a gui client? Most of my users probably would not like the complexity that the text clients have to offer.
John
|
|
|
|
|
|
I tried TortoiseHg just today.
It's quite more mature than I expected it. And even if you don't use the shell extension, it's probably the fastest and easiest way to get a working command-line Mercurial environment under Windows. (well, command line plus useful tools like qct; which is the way I use it on Linux)
|
|
|
|
|
I used Subversion for a year or two. Then I tried git... and it seemed confusing. Mercurial is the one that made me understand (and love) the DVCS concepts. The support for branching and merging is a bit like moving from CVS to SVN and noticing the repository-wide revision number: once you switch, you can't look back.
|
|
|
|
|
Being rolled out here, not being utilised for a couple of months yet for some reason. In the options I had to select "None", before I could submit an "Other" entry though...
He who makes a beast out of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man
|
|
|
|
|
Don't forget it. I wouldn't consider it until there's more client tools available, but it's starting to look a bit appealing.
|
|
|
|
|
GIT and CVS should be in the options.
In fact, I used 2, namely CVS and SVN. CVS is for the old legacy projects which we do not wish to move to SVN.
|
|
|
|
|
Most people use more than one source control system. Well I use 3
|
|
|
|
|
My department (about 10 developers) has active code in:
Visual Source Safe
PVCS
CVS
ClearCase
|
|
|
|
|
I second this as well - TFS at work, Perforce at home
-----
In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king.
|
|
|
|
|
Well for my projects I use CVS and SVN. To get code updates (mostly on the linux side) I have used hg, cvs, svn, git and bzr.
John
|
|
|
|
|
No option for CVS?
|
|
|
|
|
Rob Caldecott wrote: No option for CVS?
Thank God!
|
|
|
|
|
I am also using CVS. Now my vote didnt count
|
|
|
|
|
I also think, that CVS would be much more rated, if there will be a radio button for it.
|
|
|
|
|
Me too, I voted for it but it still does not appear in the list. I've used other systems in the past including perforce(which is awful) and like CVS for its simplicity to set up and use on both UNIX and Windows.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, absurd isn't it? It must be one of the best-known source code control systems in existence, although it is getting a bit long in the tooth. Anyway, I use it, although I think I would switch to Subversion if I didn't have so much time invested in it.
|
|
|
|
|
We are still using CVS served on a linux server. I started using it on a project in the 90s and the repository has grown from then to include the 500K+ lines of my code + 1 to 2 times that amount of other users code. The main reason not to move to subversion is that we really like the client application on windows (wincvs). Since rapidsvn is improving I am willing to give subversion a look especially because we need to move to a server that is not hosted on our network (too hard/expensive to get firewall exceptions/DMZ in our hospital) so a user can access the server remotely.
John
|
|
|
|
|
+1 to CVS from me too. We have more than 30 projects in CSV by this moment and keep counting.
Well... we think to move on Subversion soon... but we had these thoughts fom over an year now
|
|
|
|
|
I do use CVS and SVN in different development environments. Only SVN counts here .
--
Sincerely yours, Peter A. Kurishev
|
|
|
|
|
Oh my GOD !
Still some of you using VSS ? this is a very dangerous source control ! do you want to loose your work ?
|
|
|
|
|
I want to loose my work on the world... (and not lose it).
|
|
|
|
|