Click here to Skip to main content
65,938 articles
CodeProject is changing. Read more.
Articles / Languages / VB

Call Functions Until One Meets Condition

5.00/5 (16 votes)
1 May 2012CPOL1 min read 48.7K  
Call a series of functions until the return value meets a condition without a chained-if or short-circuiting.

Thanks to cechode for inspiring this tip/trick. Suppose you have the following functions:

C#
bool Step1()
{
    return true;
}
bool Step2(int val1, int val2)
{
    return val1 == val2;
}
bool Step3()
{
    MessageBox.Show("I will be reached.");
    return false;
}
bool Step4()
{
    throw new Exception("This should be impossible!");
}
VB.NET
Function Step1() As Boolean
    Return True
End Function

Function Step2(ByVal val1 As Integer, ByVal val2 As Integer) As Boolean
    Return val1 = val2
End Function

Function Step3() As Boolean
    MessageBox.Show("I will be reached.")
    Return False
End Function

Function Step4() As Boolean
    Throw New Exception("This should be impossible!")
End Function

If you want to execute each of those in sequence until one returns false, you can do the following:

C#
new Func<bool>[]
{
    Step1,
    // You can use a lambda to wrap a function with a different signature.
    () => Step2(1, 1),
    Step3,
    Step4,
    // You can use a lambda to avoid the use of a function.
    () => 0 == 1
}.Any((step) => !step());
VB.NET
' This is achieved fairly easily in VB.NET
Select Case False
    Case Step1()
    Case Step2(1, 1)
    Case Step3()
    Case Step4()
    Case 0 = 1
End Select

Note that the result need not be true or false; it can be any value or condition. I could, for example, process each function until the result is an integer greater than or equal to 5 (Note that in VB.NET the Select Case statement can't handle conditions, it can only handle values, so the code is modified accordingly):

C#
// This assumes each "Step" function from above returns an int rather than a bool.
new Func<int>[]
{
    Step1,
    () => Step2(1, 1),
    Step3,
    Step4,
    () => 0 + 1
}.Any((step) => step() >= 5);
VB.NET
' VB.NET.
Dim steps() As Func(Of Integer) =
{
    AddressOf Step1,
    Function() Step2(1, 1),
    AddressOf Step3,
    AddressOf Step4,
    Function() 0 + 1
}
 
' We test against a condition rather than a value.
steps.Any(Function([step]) [step]() >= 5)

The condition >= 5 is a very short one, so this won't save you any typing over the short-circuiting technique shown below. However, it would save you some typing for longer conditions. Specifying the condition only once rather than for each value also reduces the probability that you will make a mistake when typing. And if you change the condition later on, you only have to change the condition in one place rather than many. Here is the short-circuiting approach, which leads to duplicated code:

C#
// Don't do this.
if (Step1() >= 5 ||
    Step2(1, 1) >= 5 ||
    Step3() >= 5 ||
    Step4() >= 5 ||
    0 + 1 >= 5)
{ }
VB.NET
' VB.NET. Don't do this.
If Step1() >= 5 OrElse
Step2(1, 1) >= 5 OrElse
Step3() >= 5 OrElse
Step4() >= 5 OrElse
0 + 1 >= 5 Then
End If

While shorter for this example (due to the short condition), this code also has the maintenance problems and higher probability of human error explained above.

License

This article, along with any associated source code and files, is licensed under The Code Project Open License (CPOL)