In this tip, you will learn how to use LINQ to solve recurring problems. Here, you will see two solutions to find the gap in a series of numbers.
Introduction
Most of the time, we think about LINQ in terms of querying the data model.
However, it can give a set of alternative solutions to problems that we just drill in a very primitive and basic way. That is because it is used to perform operations on generics of any data type.
Problem
One task I handled lately was to find the gap in a series of numbers. Let us discuss the first solution that comes into one's mind when one approaches the task at the first stage.
First Solution
To be able to follow the discussion, create a .NET console application and copy the below code inside program.cs class file:
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Security.Cryptography;
namespace NumberSeriesGapFinder
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
string inputNumbers;
Console.WriteLine("Enter a set of numbers comma separated,
make sure there is no gap in the set");
Console.WriteLine("for example:1,2,4,5 has a gap while 6,7,8,9 has no gap");
inputNumbers = Console.ReadLine();
try
{
CheckGap(inputNumbers);
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
Console.WriteLine(ex.Message);
}
Console.ReadLine();
}
static void CheckGap(string inputNumbers)
{
bool GapExist = false;
List<string> SetElements;
SetElements = inputNumbers.Split(",".ToCharArray()[0]).ToList();
for (int i=0;i<SetElements.Count-1;i++)
{
if(!SetElements.Contains((int.Parse(SetElements.ElementAt(i))+1).ToString()))
{
GapExist = true;
break;
}
}
if(GapExist)
{
Console.WriteLine("Gap Exist in the series, please try again");
inputNumbers = Console.ReadLine();
CheckGap(inputNumbers);
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine("The series entered has no gaps");
}
}
}
}
The code above is a very basic solution for the problem, but there are two drawbacks after a deeper look.
- It works in a nested loop manner which will keep the memory busy holding loop index and scanning the whole series against each element.
- The numbers should be in ascending order since we do not know the element with highest value. This element should be excluded from the check since it is the upper boundary of the series.
Second Solution
Place the following code below method discussed in solution 1:
static void CheckGap2(string inputNumbers)
{
bool GapExist = false;
int MaxElement;
List<string> SetElements,SetElementsMissingSubSequent;
SetElements = inputNumbers.Split(",".ToCharArray()[0]).ToList();
MaxElement = (from x in SetElements select int.Parse(x)).Max();
SetElementsMissingSubSequent = (from x in SetElements.Where
(w=>int.Parse(w)<MaxElement)
join y in SetElements
on (int.Parse(x)+1) equals (int.Parse(y))
into lj
from ljr in lj.DefaultIfEmpty()
where ljr==null
select ljr
).ToList();
GapExist = SetElementsMissingSubSequent.Count > 0;
if (GapExist)
{
Console.WriteLine("Gap Exist in the series, please try again");
inputNumbers = Console.ReadLine();
CheckGap2(inputNumbers);
}
else
{
Console.WriteLine("The series entered has no gaps");
}
}
Notice that we have used LINQ to
- perform
left join
operator between the series and itself (you can refresh your information about left using the comments inside the method). Any number where its subsequent does not exist will satisfy the where
condition. - Select the element with maximum value of the element. The series does not have to be entered in order this way.
Now call the method from main
method and try.
Conclusion
Most of the time, we think about LINQ in terms of querying the data model .
However, it can give a set of alternative solutions to problems that we just drill in a very primitive and basic way. That is because it is used to perform operations on generics of any data type.
History
- 6th March, 2021: Initial version