|
Actually, only one person has offended me here on CP, and it happened in 2003 (I think). I won't bother dredging it up again, but the person also left many other regular users aghast at what he said.
Other than that one thing, Chris is right. People would generally have to work long and hard to find a way to offend me.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
I don't even know what cardigan is.
We actually have a Hyundai in the family.
Celine Dione? I'd hit it - as long as her mouth is taped shut... and she's handcuffed... and tied to a... - oh wait. 
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
LIES! ALL LIES!
LIAR! I am NOT a web developer!
(I thought this answer would be funnier)
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
Fair enough.
Sacha Barber
- Microsoft Visual C# MVP 2008/2009
- Codeproject MVP 2008/2009
Your best friend is you.
I'm my best friend too. We share the same views, and hardly ever argue
My Blog : sachabarber.net
|
|
|
|
|
Man, this thread is really marching across the page! I can't even tell what you're responding to.
But it sounds positive, so I guess no one will take immediate offense.
|
|
|
|
|
(I knew it. )
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
Cool
Sacha Barber
- Microsoft Visual C# MVP 2008/2009
- Codeproject MVP 2008/2009
Your best friend is you.
I'm my best friend too. We share the same views, and hardly ever argue
My Blog : sachabarber.net
|
|
|
|
|
To keep people from cheating on voting with multiple accounts, there should be a reason why you voted for the article when you select one, visible for everyone to see. That way we get rid of people who use seperate accounts to vote.
The reason i bring this up is because the article "A beginner’s guide for consuming a WCF service in JavaScript using ASP.NET AJAX - Masudur" received 17 votes in a matter of 2 mins at around 1:00 am.
Not to say this isnt possible, but if you look at how many votes the actual article has is 35 with about 4900 or so views since feb 10. Its highly unlikey that a mass amount of people just decided to vote instantly on the competition.
KISS "Keep It Simple, Stupid"
|
|
|
|
|
There are many ways for me to say how much I admire me, my writing style, or my ability to attract women. I fear I would lose interest long before I ran out of compliments for myself.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: I fear I would lose interest long before I ran out of compliments for myself.
But if we limited the character count, and you could only vote for yourself once, you'd have to get pretty damned focussed to target your narcissism.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys
|
|
|
|
|
Posted date ofOneImage[^] article is 1st March 2009.
cheers,
Abhijit
CodeProject MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Na i posted it feb 28 
KISS "Keep It Simple, Stupid"
|
|
|
|
|
VectorX wrote: Na i posted it feb 28
oh.. I am sorry. But in your article its showing Posted: 1 Mar 2009. When I checked the version its 28Feb.
cheers,
Abhijit
CodeProject MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Probably happened when it was updated from temp to article by an admin.
KISS "Keep It Simple, Stupid"
|
|
|
|
|
In the intro text "innapropriate" is spelled wrong (extra 'n').
Cheers,
Drew.
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
- the quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get
- use the code block button (PRE tags) to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets
|
|
|
|
|
Aaaaah. One of those nights!
Cheers,
Drew.
|
|
|
|
|
There may be a way to do this already - but I'm blowed if I can find it.
When I visit a forum I would like to see only messages posted since my last visit - but to see the whole thread of which that thread forms a part.
i.e. show all threads changes since my last visit - expanding the (first, last or all) message(s) withing the thread that have been posted since my last visit - but still showing (unexpanded) all other messages within the thread.
On the same subject, I'm not sure the current filtering is working quite right- I filtered by messages since last visit - and saw tow messages - but there was at lease one other message less than 5 minutes old which did not appear until I changed to show all messages.
So - if I go to this forum right now,m with filter set to 'last day' layout 'normal' I see a post by Hans 31 mins ago, and a reply by Chris 11 mins ago (subject'I got it') (and a few other messages). If I change the filter to 'last visit' I only see Hans' post.
___________________________________________
.\\axxx
(That's an 'M')
|
|
|
|
|
There's no way to do what you want at the moment, but I'll add it to the TODO
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
The killer argument for why we need images in posts: email addresses. That's right, you make an image of your email address, put it in your sig or post, and you don't have to worry about bots and spiders signing you up for all kinds of prurient spam!
|
|
|
|
|
A better way is to have your email address in a table, one cell per character. It's text, can be cut and pasted, and needs no images.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Great idea, however I see a couple of problems:
1. it generates a newline for each new cell and each new row (in FF3, after the copy the clipboard contains an array of strings)
2. how do we fit all the HTML code in the 500-character limit imposed on our sigs?
3. shouldn't we expect bots to catch up on that rather easily?
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [My Articles]
- before you ask a question here, search CodeProject, then Google
- the quality and detail of your question reflects on the effectiveness of the help you are likely to get
- use the code block button (PRE tags) to preserve formatting when showing multi-line code snippets
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with Luc.
How about an option Convert my sig to image on the member's settings page? That way you (CP) can control the images.
|
|
|
|
|
Just say no to images.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
I can tell Chris is weakening on this one.
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
