|
That's all fine for static IP's but alot of users can have dynamic IP's (I have at home) so they can just change it when they want.
+ the IP that is being banned is then given to someone else and there is a chance that that person is also a member here and finds himself blocked for no good reason. K it's a very small chance but it could happen
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: the IP needs to be verified
Rajesh: How does the cybercell of our police work? I believe they don't just depend upon IP addresses but verify with the ISPs en route as well. This should also help out to weed out bad apples however a good amount of homework needs to be done to cover multiple laws.Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
The woods are lovely, dark and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep!
|
|
|
|
|
I'd suggest to strike 1 (or maybe a strike 0) a simple visual change - say the change to the icon, for 7 days. Nothing else.
Won't help against those to clueless to notice they are misbehaving, and won't help against those with malicous intent. But t5here might be a miniscule amount of teens that just haven't learnt manners - and still haven't had some fundamental physics lesson - earth revoles around the sun, not them. Suspending them will enrange them, close them out, and stimulate creating more accounts and "slashing back".
A pestilence "mark" on the icon makes it immediatekly visible to us - and maybe easier to ignore.
Chris might even throw in an option hiding thir posts. Which gives me an idea: Just hide their posts for everyone else. So they have their playground, can post their crap, but only they will see it. Muhahahahahahahaaa!
Just a little overly optimistic social theory. From a geek.
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: the current crop of retards is decimating the C# forum.
Isn't that a requirement for using C#? You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think I've fixed these. Will do an update today or tomorrow cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
There is 2009, should be 2010
|
|
|
|
|
Oopsie daisy. Thanks Petr! Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
The title's are correct now but in the description there is still 2009
This is the voting form for the Best ASP.NET article of January 2009 competition. Below are a list of the top 10 articles submitted last month. Please choose the ones you consider your favourite. Remember - you can only vote once!
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed! Should be good until next year. Hopefully at that time we'll get it right. Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
we can always just pretend it's still 2009 and throw a huge party
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks,
Sean Ewington
The Code Project
|
|
|
|
|
bahar3 [^] troll is spamming the C# forum (and, I suspect, he is also surreptitiously enriching uranium ).
Please ban him.If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler.
-- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong.
-- Iain Clarke
[My articles]
|
|
|
|
|
And this guy[^] is encouraginging him/her. I suspect the first one is sima3(?) who was kicked off two days ago. MVP 2010 - are they mad?
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks mate. It is very irritating!! Excellence is doing ordinary things extraordinarily well.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
You could remove all those rubbish threads entirely.
The forum looks really messed up. I browsed through the first few pages to see if there's any interesting query, and all I see is this nonsense!
“Follow your bliss.” – Joseph Campbell
|
|
|
|
|
Rajesh R Subramanian wrote: You could remove all those rubbish threads entirely.
Agreed. It just does not look good.Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest. Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for...
|
|
|
|
|
|
The home page lists some survey's for best article's of January 2009 ?
Shouldn't that be 2010?
The description also says 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
I already posted it two posts below this one.
Here ^[^]"Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling.
—Bjarne Stroustrup
|
|
|
|
|
Awch that will teach me to post before reading
|
|
|
|
|
"Legacy code" often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling.
—Bjarne Stroustrup
|
|
|
|
|
It will be nice to add a "Most popular news" section in the weekly newsletter. If you can't explain something to a six year old, you really don't understand it yourself. (Albert Einstein)
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent idea. I'll add it to the TODO cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I signed up for CP twice from the same email, Yes I did and I don't know hwo this happened and I know it shouldn't allow me to do it but it did.
The problem is with the newsletters I got, the emails that goes to my email for the newsletter or any thing that CP send it to my email, they send 2 copies of the same email.
So my bug is it send 2 email of the same subject to my email. How can I stop this and only receive one email of the newsletter?
If you need more information about my problem please feel free to ask me.
|
|
|
|