|
Luc Pattyn wrote: Pure Chaos
Yup - Pure Chaos.
Me, I'm dishonest. And a dishonest man you can always trust to be dishonest. Honestly. It's the honest ones you want to watch out for...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oi. Who is creating chaos now? I did NOT write "Pure Chaos", JSOP did.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read code that is properly formatted, adding PRE tags is the easiest way to obtain that. All Toronto weekends should be extremely wet until we get it automated in regular forums, not just QA.
|
|
|
|
|
This is a known issue that we've not ha a chance to fix. It's definitely on our TODO though. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Lately, I've been noticing that when you paste a link into the editor, it takes anywhere from 1 to 7 seconds to paste the whole thing. The url that you're trying to paste shows up almost immediately, but the "decoration" added by CP takes several seconds to be added to the pasted URL..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Is it consistent, or jsut at certain times.
When pasting there are a few things that happen:
1. We see if it's a URL
1.1 if it's a URL for an article then we try and find the title of the article
so we can have the text of the link be the title, not the URL
1.2 if it's a non-article link we paste and inlinkerate
2. [In Quick Answers] If it's not a URL we see if it's potentially a code block. If it is we wrap it in PRE tags.
These checks are all done using ajax, so that's the lag your seeing. Would it help for us to time how long it's taking for you and disable this if it goes over, say 5 secs?cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, the longest lag is when I'm pasting a link to an article. That explains it..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed today that the number of pages views for a given article are not the same as the number reported in your "My Articles" list. For instance, I posted an article today, and in the list it showed 107 Page Views, but when I actually viewed the article, it show 60 views.
EDIT ===========
It seems to be fairly close now. I guess it's just a matter of how you reload the page. Weirdness. You can safely ignore this if you want..45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
In my experience, the page view number varies a lot, I suspect a caching situation amongst all the servers. If you want an accurate number, ask for it ten times and take the highest number you get.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read code that is properly formatted, adding PRE tags is the easiest way to obtain that. All Toronto weekends should be extremely wet until we get it automated in regular forums, not just QA.
|
|
|
|
|
The "My Articles" page seems to be correct. The views ( and votes ) on the article page itself lag behind a bit and vary by server.
Nick----------------------------------
Be excellent to each other
|
|
|
|
|
It's due to caching. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think it's a major one.Here @ Brady Kelly page[^]
Title as Articles by <font face="Consolas">Brady Kelly</font> (3 articles found) - CodeProject
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. I've fixed this in development and will have the fix uploaded soon. cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
welcome, catch u again
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.codeproject.com/answers/58604/soale-shakhsi.aspx[^].45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
And so it shall remain. (I would have deleted it too) cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
It would be nice if we could track the questions we deleted so we could undelete them in situations like this (especially if we didn't have the link and we didn't make a reply).
|
|
|
|
|
you are hereby fined 300 editor points.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read code that is properly formatted, adding PRE tags is the easiest way to obtain that. All Toronto weekends should be extremely wet until we get it automated in regular forums, not just QA.
|
|
|
|
|
Click[^] which should show Snow, Snow, Snow tread but it doesn't show until the Balboos reply to Advantages of a Face Veil is clicked. The formatting is all messed up for the reply and below in both IE6 & Firefox 3.5.7 Steve
_________________
I C(++) therefore I am
|
|
|
|
|
It's the same in IE8 as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Cool Steve
_________________
I C(++) therefore I am
|
|
|
|
|
I think the post length count that warns if a post is considered long needs to be increased for tips/tricks as it would be expected for them to be longer than a normal forum post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is there anything you can do to prevent everything from being marked read if I click a forum link twice before the first request is handled? I assume what's happening is I create two sessions. One from: last visit = 2:50PM; last Update 3:56:00; and the second: last visit = 3:56:00PM; last Update 3:56:01. I then get the latter session and all the messages that should have been shown as new vanish into the aether. 3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|