|
It would certainly add a popularity rather than quality element to the rep which may or may not be a good thing depending on your point of view. I'll stay on the fence for now!
DaveIf this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. (Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe some of the 1-votes are removed when their owner-accounts got deleted?
|
|
|
|
|
Possibly, but then the articles average/tip average score would have changed too which doesn't seem to have happened (unless there's some caching somewhere)
DaveIf this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. (Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
|
|
|
|
|
I've never seen delays, with one exception: browsing forums shows message votes with a delay (I'd say max 1 minute), i.e. the vote count goes up and down as different servers deliver the same page.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
|
Hm, I don't think Dave is a popular target for 1-votes, but yes it is a possibility: if a low vote gets somehow removed, and a high vote gets added, author rep would rise, vote count would not change.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: I don't think Dave is a popular target for 1-votes
I keep my head down (i.e. out of the Back Room and SB), I'm not very active in the lounge although I visit it several times a day and I tend to keep away from flame wars. I just can't be bothered to deal with confrontation in my 'leisure' time here on CP - not my idea of fun!
DaveIf this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. (Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
|
|
|
|
|
That's what I meant, and I do pretty much the same.
FWIW: I think some or all of the back rooms have been disarmed.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
|
Dave, I haven't noticed anything special on my own author rep (and I think I would have if there were some anomaly), and I can't see anything special on yours either.
You probably remember we both have updated our T&Ts on John's instigation, around May 22, when Chris added a description line. That made them feature (again) on the CP home page, probably leading to new views and votes. Although that was more than 2 weeks ago, I would venture it as the cause of what you now see happening.
An alternative would be a bug in T&T, where my activity is pretty low, while yours isn't. Maybe adding/editing comments yields author rep without being listed in the rep FAQ table.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: Maybe adding/editing comments yields author rep without being listed in the rep FAQ table
That would make sense, although that would be better in Authority if I understand the groupings correctly.
DaveIf this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier. (Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
|
|
|
|
|
correct.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
|
Jim Crafton brought up an interesting point - the Reputation Points/Graph doesn't include man points.
I think this is a rather egregious omission and should remedied forthwith.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: the Reputation Points/Graph doesn't include man points
What is 'man' points? Am i missing something? Was it there earlier?
|
|
|
|
|
This Lounge post[^] might enlighten you, though John's suggestion is in part, a jest.
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
|
|
|
|
|
there is no end to the list of missing categories: courage, sacrifice, quality, creativity, originality, wit, civility, W&KS safety, etc. etc. I'm afraid the hamsters can't cope with all that, they seem quite busy keeping the mills going as it is.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
|
I hear by nominate you to keep track of everyone's man points and update the reputation points for each member
|
|
|
|
|
And Chris won't let my implement Matthew points. You get points for just being ME
|
|
|
|
|
There is, however, the heisenberg-like issue that if you check your man-points, then you automatically lose man-points. If you are checking another man's man-points then you lose double.
It's made testing, well, difficult. Especially since actually testing code itself results in loss of man points.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know what the TechEd keynote speaker has been telling you, Chris, however please consider the possibility you misunderstood it somehow. Testing, locating bugs and fixing them still earns you all kinds of points, don't let MS sales people tell you otherwise.
Luc Pattyn [Forum Guidelines] [Why QA sucks] [My Articles]
I only read formatted code with indentation, so please use PRE tags for code snippets.
I'm not participating in frackin' Q&A, so if you want my opinion, ask away in a real forum (or on my profile page).
|
|
|
|
|
And of course, someone will create, or at least claim to have created, an App that scams the system and artificially inflates your man-points. Of course, clicking on these Ads result in a drastic reduction in your man-points.
|
|
|
|
|
The only acceptable man-test is, of course, did it compile? Noticing the 360 warnings loses you points.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx
|
|
|
|
|
The slash /FO switch instructs the compiler to go ahead and build the binary anyways, even if there are compilation errors.
Workout progress:
Current arm size: 14.4in
Desired arm size: 18in
Next Target: 15.4in by Dec 2010
Current training method: HIT
|
|
|
|
|
There is a link at the top of each programming forum "View unanswered questions in the ASP.NET forum".
This link states:
Note that a question remains "unanswered" until the member who created the question explicitly marks an answer as a "good answer". This means that a question could appear on this list despite having a number of answer-type replies.
My question is, since it's already being tracked if a particular answer is marked good by Enquirer or not, do reputation system takes care of it as 'Answer Accepted'? Does the points of 'Answer Accepted' awarded to OP for it or just an up-vote points?
Logically, based on the work-flow and to keep consistency, answer accepted points should be awarded. (if they are not!)
What say?
|
|
|
|
|
In Quick Answers a member receives points if their answer is marked accepted. The author of the question does not get points for this, however. But maybe they should.. We're not doing this in the forums at all. I'll add it to the TODO. Thanks for spotting this.
|
|
|
|
|
Thiru Thirunavukarasu wrote: But maybe they should.. We're not doing this in the forums at all
BY this you mean member will recieve points if their answer is marked accepted in Forums too. Right?
|
|
|
|
|