|
Yep - "Hardware". Could be a site bug (or one that was around when I originally posted the article).
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
BTW... nice game!
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any functionality on CP that allows us to share files privately between users?
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
maybe you could create a collaborative unfinished article, and upload/download some ZIP files to/from it? I'd expect all co-authors would be able to access the files.
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah - that worked well the last time I tried it.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
but this time I added a little twist: you name the team members explicitly, by making them co-authors. I've never done that, but if it doesn't do what you want, how could people co-author an article at all?
|
|
|
|
|
That might work, but then I'd have another article that I can't delete.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
I just remembered, there is also a "collaborative group" account, which I would guess is a single account shared by several people. You'd have to create one for each combination of people you're interested in. Again, not from my own experience.
BTW: don't modify your regular account, I remember some problems were reported when you change its type.
PS: If you care for an experiment, I'm willing to help out.
|
|
|
|
|
There is the 'Uploads' system that is in place for platinum members (see top right, next to 'Sign out' - if it's not there then I can open that up a little)
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Can other users download from your uploads?
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
I uploaded a kitten image the other day, see here[^].
And I just uploaded a ZIP for your experimental purposes, see here: "/script/Membership/Uploads/648011/JSOPtest.zip"
BTW: as these are my uploads I expect you can download/read/use them (assuming you know the exact URL), but not modify/delete them. So it may not be the perfect solution for real collaboration.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes. the purpose of uploads is specifically to give you a place to share files.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Ahhh - perfect then.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Not visible to me!
|
|
|
|
|
Is that supposed to be all platinum members or only those who are platinum in on topic areas? I've only got it for debater/organizer.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
I don't know, I suddenly had an "Uploads" menu (in between "My Articles" and "Sign Out"). I don't know what triggered it, my best guess is Golden Authorship. I wish CP would make such things public, the rep FAQ would be a nice place to collect descriptions of the rep color consequences.
|
|
|
|
|
It's for authors only at the moment.
It's an old, oooold system that was never designed for mass use. However, there's a need, so I'm going to add a general improvement item to the TODO.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Chris,
I was browing the site and came across this article:
Write Templates for Visual Studio 2010[^]
At first glance the article appears to be complete garbage. But after watching the videos I realized there was alot of useful information within the article in video format. It would be great if I could watch those videos without having to leave the site. You guys are way behind on this and should upgrade the website to include embedded flash video options for authors.
I did a little research and came across this:
Add Silverlight video to your articles[^]
Unfortunately I could not find any information regarding embedding Flash videos... which is currently dominating vector animation/media delivery in the browser market. Is this something you guys have considered?
Anyway... HTML5 will be standardized in a few years and will include a <video> tag. I am hoping to be able to watch videos in future codeproject.com articles.
Best Wishes,
-David Delaune
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, we definitely encourage Flash videos in our articles. In the article editor, 2nd row, 2nd icon, is a 'movie' button that allows you to enter Flash movies into your articles.
It's not currently working for Silverlight, but we have that as a known bug and will fix it as soon as we can get to it.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
1. Write message
2. Uncheck 'Use HTML in this post'
3. Post it
4. Edit that message
5. Check 'Use HTML in this post'
6. Update/Post it
on 6th step it should remember 'Use HTML in this post' as checked but no it doesn't. So now when you will write a new message you will find 'Use HTML in this post' still unchecked which suppose to be checked.
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia>
-----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
you can change the default settings of those checkboxes on your settings page[^] (forum tab).
you can also change them on the edit page of a new message, not on the edit page when editing a message; yes it is confusing.
|
|
|
|
|
Luc Pattyn wrote: not on the edit page when editing a message
yes but why not ?
TVMU^P[[IGIOQHG^JSH`A#@`RFJ\c^JPL>;"[,*/|+&WLEZGc`AFXc!L
%^]*IRXD#@GKCQ`R\^SF_WcHbORY87֦ʻ6ϣN8ȤBcRAV\Z^&SU~%CSWQ@#2
W_AD`EPABIKRDFVS)EVLQK)JKQUFK[M`UKs*$GwU#QDXBER@CBN%
R0~53%eYrd8mt^7Z6]iTF+(EWfJ9zaK-iTV.C\y<pjxsg-b$f4ia>
-----------------------------------------------
128 bit encrypted signature, crack if you can
|
|
|
|
|
Xmen W.K. wrote: on 6th step it should remember 'Use HTML in this post'
The feeling from some of the other members who discussed this - and ultimately led to it's current form - is that if you go back and edit an old message that was posted with a setting different from your standard setting then it should not then perpetuate that change to all your new postings.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I was in at least one of those earlier discussions.
It still is my feeling the user comfort could be improved in two mutually exclusive ways:
1.
have the defaults be settable only on the settings page
AND add the message "changing these settings will apply to this message only" on the edit message page
2.
leave the logic as is
AND add one of the messages "changing these settings will also change the default for future messages, as you are creating a new message now" or "changing these settings will apply to this message only, as you are editing an existing message" on the edit message page
|
|
|
|