|
Yep we do have a couple tasks to help alleviate this common problem. But we don't want to hide the Add Answer button altogether. There are some legitimate cases of its use by the OP.
Specifically we were planning to take the OP to the edit page of the question with a special notice at the top. From there they can choose to:
1. Do as we suggest and improve the question
2. Go back to the question view page and add a comment
3. Acknowledge that a new answer is actually want is intended and go ahead with it
Another feature we're planning is the ability to demote answers to comments.
|
|
|
|
|
Thiru Thirunavukarasu wrote: Another feature we're planning is the ability to demote answers to comments
This would be a good one.
|
|
|
|
|
The only legit use I can think of is to post a solution the OP has found - which rarely happens with the programming forums, so I'm not holding my breath! Still lets see how the revised version works!
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, that's been my experience two or three times. In one instance, it took a couple months of working with MS to get an answer. I figured that that answer needed to be well noted, so I posted the answer to my own question.
|
|
|
|
|
Right. I think this is actually a common occurrence. We do often find the solution to our programming problems. The question is whether the OP chooses to update his/her question.
|
|
|
|
|
Thiru Thirunavukarasu wrote: Another feature we're planning is the ability to demote answers to comments.
While on the face-value, this is great feature, but I see troubles ahead too. Who decided it is a comment not an answer? What if I provide what I think is legitimate answer, but another person thinks it is more of a comment and then s/he demotes it. May be it should work similar to "vote to remove message" feature, but with much weaker weight. Say, instead of single person's interpretation, the algorithm takes into account the person's RP and applies some weight, when the threshold reaches certain value, poof, time to demote man!
Just my 2¢
|
|
|
|
|
I suspect it will be manual, and by user level, in the same way that you need silver or gold to edit, delete, etc.
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
Correct you will need to be at least a silver.
|
|
|
|
|
I just clicked on "Ask a Question" in the QA section, and was presented with the edit window, Subject, Tags and Content. Unfortunately the section that starts: "A few simple rules when posting your question." was not visible so I saw no guidance on the rules for posting. Maybe if the rules appeared first, and the questioner had at least to scroll past them before getting to the edit box, then at least some of them may read the guidelines in advance of their post.
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Regardless of where you put the instructions, they will be ignored.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: the instructions, they will be ignored
true, and even more so when they would be incomplete, confusing or hard to find.
Some people will ignore everything, nevertheless good instructions are bound to be more effective than bad ones or none at all (I don't even see them on my laptop without scrolling).
|
|
|
|
|
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote: Regardless of where you put the instructions, they will be ignored.
My point was that since they don't appear on the first screen we can hardly criticise people for not following them. If the instructions are the first thing they see then all those that ignore them could be referred to your goodself for chastisement.
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Comments are useless not just to the compilers but also to the programmers. Any doubt ?
...byte till it megahertz...
|
|
|
|
|
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|
|
I am really glad to see a regular expression forum - they are complex enough that I think it is well justified.
Just a few thoughts:
1) It isn't listed in the Programming Discussions list under the "Q&A" menu - perhaps it should?
2) No "How to get an Answer" message like we do with the C#, VB, etc.
3) It would be really helpfully if we directed people to somewhere like www.ultrapico.com[^] with the suggestion they download Expresso because it could educate them on regexes and probably fix half the problems before they get raised. It's free! (Yes, I know there are others, but that's the one I use, ok?)
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
|
|
|
|
|
Since it appeared, the responsiveness has reduced and slowed, and there has been a loss of functionality (the ctrl [arrow key] no longer works).
I thought there may be an issue with one machine, but it affects two others as well.
Whatever you have done is unpleasant and should be reversed.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Which CodeProject are you using? I see no yellow bar, response is fine, and the up down keys work just fine.
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|
|
I just logged on as normal.
There is a yellow bar pinned to the top of the messages.
Is says "Hint: For improved responsiveness use Internet Explorer 4, Firefox or above. Ensure Javascript is enabled and choose 'Normal' from the Layout dropdown and hit 'Update'."
OFFS!!!!
Sorted.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Hey, cool trick!
It's time for a new signature.
|
|
|
|
|
Try the konami code and look at the bottom of the page!
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
Hi there!
after two 5 votes in the C/C++ forum I got this message with the third one:
You or someone at your IP address has been voting too often. Please wait a moment and try again.
This makes it hard to appreciate good answers...
/Moak
|
|
|
|
|
Moak wrote: after two 5 votes in the C/C++ forum I got this message with the third one:
You or someone at your IP address has been voting too often. Please wait a moment and try again.
This makes it hard to appreciate good answers...
Yeah, that's been my experience too. It should definitely be higher than this, specially for 5 votes. For 1 votes a max of two votes within a time makes sense, for 5 votes it should be raised to at least six.
|
|
|
|
|
How about we agree to 5 per minute?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: How about we agree to 5 per minute?
I'll take it
|
|
|
|
|
How about no limit for upvoting with 5?
How bad can it be if you "like" a lot of posts... okay a limit for non-human voting can be imposed, but I guess you the hamsters handle that somewhere else already.
|
|
|
|