|
|
Yeah, and his picture scares me.
|
|
|
|
|
You're going to have his account deleted because he has a photoshopped picture of Christian as his own picture? That's bordering on absurd.
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001
|
|
|
|
|
Gladly, you don't have your actual photo in your profile page (here, I am assuming that what is there in your profile page is not your actual photo ).
Now, for Christian, it was one photo and one account. Imagining you have your photo in your profile page, probably we'll have to delete hundreds of such accounts every week.
Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself. - Cicero
.·´¯`·->Rajesh<-·´¯`·.
Codeproject.com: Visual C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
There's a bit more to it than just the picture -
-He submitted a junk article - basically the template filled with "Was there anything you found interesting..." repeated a couple of hundred times.
-His four posts are garbage at best, complete drivel at worst
-I suspect he 1-voted Christians article on which he has commented
-He's been a member < 24 hours...
|
|
|
|
|
If a one person has a problem with another person and goes about it civily then there's no problem. But if a person creates an account specifically to target and ridicule someone else then it gets nuked. The terms of use specifically state that stalking or harassing another member is not allowed.
This all goes against the larger issue of members harassing others.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is obviously Kyle. His other account 'DeamonPossessed' needs deleted too.
|
|
|
|
|
Since you know this is not true your post violates this part of the terms of use
Defame, abuse, harass, stalk, threaten or otherwise violate the legal rights (such as rights of privacy and publicity) of others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
There seems to be some bad HTML posted in ASP.NET forum by some and the forum layout (not excluding left navigation menu) is breaking.
As on 05/30/2008 0100 Eastern Time, this anomaly is epicentered in Page 4 of ASP.NET forum.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
Permalink?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Could you allow us to delete posts and associated messages from blogs? I want shot of a current (and only) thread for something else
|
|
|
|
|
I support the view. The blog page owner should have absolute control over any/all content posted on the page. Of course, this comes within CodeProject Terms of Service and appropriate laws of land (Toronto and the country of the post owner).
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
No, not total control. Deleting, yes, but editing and posting on another's behalf won't be added.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: Deleting, yes,
Chris Maunder wrote: editing and posting on another's behalf won't be added
Regret if my phrase 'Total Control' meant this. This wasn't intended anyway. Posting on another's behalf should be only restricted to CP Administrator and a chosen set of moderators reserved for specific purposes.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
You should now be able to do this.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
This page[^] has broken layout.
If it helps, here's the screenshot[^]. As you can see, green menu is complete mess, but it doesn't happen all the time.
And yes, I tried CTRL+F5
Mostly, when you see programmers, they aren't doing anything. One of the attractive things about programmers is that you cannot tell whether or not they are working simply by looking at them. Very often they're sitting there seemingly drinking coffee and gossiping, or just staring into space. What the programmer is trying to do is get a handle on all the individual and unrelated ideas that are scampering around in his head. (Charles M Strauss)
|
|
|
|
|
Suggestion: it would be nice to have an rss feed around the Code Insider Daily newsletter...
|
|
|
|
|
Since it appears that articles previously rejected are re-appearing with little or no changes, could we look at maybe creating a page of rejected articles and some of the reasons why, so if something looks familiar we can go back and check?
|
|
|
|
|
Taking it little further, the author who has frequently rejected articles should be still quarantined (since there is a high probability of an abuse of a substandard article posting by him) and made to go through a still tougher scrutiny.
This should be something similar to banking systems where an account which suffers frequent dishonor of checks would be under close scrutiny.
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|
|
The only problem I see with that is them just creating a new account. It would be nice to user name/article title/reason rejected/link to original article. If you could sort on name/article we could identify abusers. I'd keep more track of them but if the article has already been removed then I don't know about it.
|
|
|
|
|
There is a serious bug in the article submission wizard at http://www.codeproject.com/script/Articles/SubmitStep1.aspx
If you don't enter anything and click "Next", you get this ugly error!
Error: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.. Ticket: 23040
NO VALIDATION!!!!!
Certified VB6, SQL 7 and ASP developer
|
|
|
|
|
No. I am presented with a ValidationSummary demanding BaseName, ArticleTitle and a one line description. It even has a serverside validation for blank spaces:
The basename contained web-unfriendly characters. The name has been changed from " a" to "__a"<br />
Subsection must be in a valid state.<br />
A section needs to be selected. <br />
A subsection needs to be selected.<br />
We respectfully ask that you please read and indicate your acceptance of the contributor's agreement. This agreement allows us to publish your article and outlines your rights and obligations.<br />
Please, choose at least one attribute, that can be applied to your article.
Which browser are you using?
Vasudevan Deepak Kumar
Personal Homepage Tech Gossips
A pessimist sees only the dark side of the clouds, and mopes; a philosopher sees both sides, and shrugs; an optimist doesn't see the clouds at all - he's walking on them. --Leonard Louis Levinson
|
|
|
|