|
i have created the header,footer and sidemene in .asp
How do i ....add it to my other content page?
wat code do i need to type? is it type the coding on all my content page?
already been 1 week i havent link it to the content to my boss~~~~~ sigh~
|
|
|
|
|
You can do something like:
<body>
<!-- #include file="header.asp" -->
Page content here.
<!-- #include file="footer.asp" -->
</body>
|
|
|
|
|
how bout if i want to add to left hand side of the content? which i put for my menu botton.
|
|
|
|
|
The anti-table people will cringe...but you could do something like:
<body>
<!-- #include file="header.asp" -->
<table border=0 cellpadding=0 cellspacing=0>
<tr>
<td>
<!-- #include file="sidemenu.asp" -->
</td>
<td>
Page content here.
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<!-- #include file="footer.asp" -->
</body>
- S
50 cups of coffee and you know it's on!
|
|
|
|
|
beside using table is there anyother way?? cause quick troublesome to add another table since i'm maitaining the old site which have more then 30 pages there....
|
|
|
|
|
Well...you're going to have to modify the 30+ pages to use your new header, footer, sidemenu scheme, but at least you can include and not have to cut and paste.
An alternative would be to use frames, but I've never ventured down that road, so maybe google it.
- S
50 cups of coffee and you know it's on!
|
|
|
|
|
yes true, thanks for the code anyway
btw, i wonder y using frames is not good for business site? most of the commerce site they dont use frame.. any disadvantage about it?
-- modified at 2:08 Thursday 22nd June, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
I've heard just to avoid frames in general, but don't know the details. My experience is that every site I've visited that used frames sucked real bad. I'm sure you can find something on google or CP about why it is bad to use frames.
- S
50 cups of coffee and you know it's on!
|
|
|
|
|
There is some problem ~
when i just add the include for footer which lower botom my content page still remain in dreamweaver design but when i add another include for the header, i only see my header in the dreamweaer design layout??? wat happen? but when i test it the full page is coming out nice.... ??? have u use dreamweaver to create asp site????
my company old site was used front page to create... but now i using dreamweaver will it effect the layout? cause i having problem when edit the old page...
|
|
|
|
|
I've never used Dreamweaver, so can't help you. I hand code everything, which may seem stupid, but it produces nice readable, updatable html.
I've looked at some Dreamweaver files, and it made me want to turn my stomach inside out and wash it with chlorine. What I saw was a lot of absolute positioned DIVs, and if you try to modify the html, everything was broken.
Sorry, maybe someone else can help....
- S
50 cups of coffee and you know it's on!
|
|
|
|
|
i having problem showing the header and footer... at first i try use in dreamweaver i press F12 the header and footer come out correctly, but when i type the addess to show the index.asp the header and footer was not there??~?~?~ wat happen? even my other page also didnt show up. i had already put the include code there..???????
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Can anyone help me,
I want to disable the click sound when i click on a link to load a new page in a frame.
is this possible?
I know i can do this through control panel...
but i want to do it using javascript.
Thanx alot
|
|
|
|
|
That is only possible by using javascript to fetch the content instead of loading a new page.
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately we have to post variables from another page, i doubt if it will then be possible.
The variables that we receive is not part of the form that does the posting, it is to indicate witch category must be loaded in the main frame.
Thanks for your response.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I developped an application using some ajax that does several common Active Directory tasks like creating a user, deleting one, ...
One of these is to move a user's home directory from one server to another. And here comes my "problem".
My application calls an asp page that create an ActiveX dll which will do all the copying of the files.
Problem is this may takes hours depending on the amount of datas and the speed of the lines between servers and therefore the user ( well the network admins ) doesn't get to see anything of the progress.
What would you do to show some progress ? I must use an ActiveX dll (for authentification reasons) to do the moving other than that I think I'm pretty free to do what I want.
I already tried to go multithread on my ActiveX but since VB6 doesn't handle multithreading at all, it was a no-go.
Any idea / suggestion are more than welcome. 
Thanks a lot !
|
|
|
|
|
Um...is there a good reason why you can't use the Progress bar control?
(Oh and VB does do multithreading - but only apartment threaded)
"Now I guess I'll sit back and watch people misinterpret what I just said......"
Christian Graus At The Soapbox
|
|
|
|
|
How would you use the progress bar control on an asp page ??
Still my problem is to get some progress info back from my activeX to my web page
|
|
|
|
|
Create the ActiveX with the progress bar as its UI, then just use as per any other ActiveX control in a webpage (Google for the <object> tag)
You won't be able to drop the PB directly on the page, but if you code up the ActiveX to have it as its interface, then it just gets displayed - I've used this technique many times before, and pretty bulletproof
"Now I guess I'll sit back and watch people misinterpret what I just said......"
Christian Graus At The Soapbox
|
|
|
|
|
If Richard's suggestion doesn’t meet your needs you can always go the extremely simple route and at the start of file coping display some type of animated GIF, one like oh the file copy GIF. Hide it when the coping is done.
I have done something very similar with a thick client and the users where happy to see the app busy churning away on their work…
I'd love to help, but unfortunatley I have prior commitments monitoring the length of my grass. :Andrew Bleakley:
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately I haven't had time yet to test Richard's suggestion. Since this is something I never did before, it'll require a bit more time than what I'm used to to try it.
As for solution, I'm already using it. I've put an animated clock when the work is being done. But what I really need is an ETA.
Worst case scenario, I 'll compute the approximative time to process the files and display it. But I'm rather confident on Richard's idea.
As soon as I work again on it, I'll post the progress / solution I'll be using.
Thanks a lot for the help !
|
|
|
|
|
Narfix wrote: As for solution, I'm already using it. I've put an animated clock when the work is being done.
take a look here http://www.vbaccelerator.com/home/Resources/Graphics_Library/AVI/File_Tasks/article.asp[^]
Part way down there is the standard windows file copy avi. nothing like giving your users the same thing that windows does.
Copy_Multiple_Files_XP.avi
Narfix wrote: But I'm rather confident on Richard's idea.
Nothing like giving the user a realistic time line. The reason I would go the other way is it can be difficult to calculate how long it will take to transfer files over the network, bandwidth has a tendency of disappearing. That is unless you just count the number of files and set the progress bar to that figure and count up to the total.
Narfix wrote: Thanks a lot for the help
Glad to have been able to help you.
I'd love to help, but unfortunatley I have prior commitments monitoring the length of my grass. :Andrew Bleakley:
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have a table row structured like this (mind the XSL variable):
and I have been using JavaScript like:
var tr = document.getElementById(this.Table).rows.item(i + 1);
if(tr.childNodes[0].childNodes[0].value == 1 || tr.childNodes[0].childNodes[0].value == 2)
{
}
This works perfectly fine in Internet Explorer. But in Mozilla Firefox I get:
tr.childNodes[0].childNodes[0] has no properties
Somehow childNodes, obj.parentElement, etc are not working anymore in Mozilla Firefox. Is
the DOM tree syntax totally different between IE and FF?
Please can someone help.
|
|
|
|
|
If you use the standard syntax and not IE specific features (as you have in that code), they work the same.
The difference is what nodes the document is parsed into. The nodes in the document tree is not only the html elements, but also every piece of plain text between the elements is a node.
In Firefox, the first child node of the td element is not the input element. You just have to go through the elements until you find an element node.
You can use the nodeType property to find out the type of the node. The value is 1 for elements and 3 for text nodes.
---
b { font-weight: normal; }
|
|
|
|
|
In Firefox, the #text node is considered as a child node, and that's probably what you got when accessing tr.childNodes[0]. So yes, the DOM tree syntax are different.
I believe that a row node has a specific property to access its td collection named cells. Try that one instead. Hope that helps
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner" - Ross
Edbert
Sydney, Australia
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
