|
mpavas wrote: www.mydomain/registration.aspx?email=pavas.malviya@hh.com®key=%$%$@@###usueyend*&^$#^%^$#%^
Since this is a registration page URL, I don't think you really need to rewrite it. Also passing email address through URL is not a good idea.
|
|
|
|
|
why do you want to send everything through querystring....
Its not good... use other means of transfer.....
Abhishek Sur
|
|
|
|
|
This is a URL which users click and get activated to our site. Hence I need to bind the details with the email id. Other parameter is the unique 128 bit encrypted key.
Some time this URL is broken [based on the email client users use]. Hence it becomes difficult for them to get activated.
Regards,
Pavas
|
|
|
|
|
I have some code in a DLL that is used by several apps - some ASP.NET, some WinForms, and one console.
I need to set up logging in the DLL in different ways (e.g. using Trace for ASP.NET) according to the app type - is it possible to determine the app context from a DLL? e.g. by AppDomain ?
'Howard
|
|
|
|
|
The easiest way is to pass a parameter to whatever class you want to instantiate. Of course, if httpcontext != null then it is a web application. I don't know if you can tell from the appDomain.
I didn't get any requirements for the signature
|
|
|
|
|
You got good advice on checking the http context. We use this to check the source of the code, and you can check it easily enough in your code simply by checking HttpContext.Current. If it's null, it's not a web app.
|
|
|
|
|
So it looks like the consensus is check HttpContext then - thanks
'Howard
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I have ajax toolkit tab container on my form. On one of the tab panels , I have radio button list
with two radio buttons inside.
Now I want to find out in my javascript that which one is clicked.
But before that I can not get hold of radio button list in my javascript as its now nested. it becomes TabContainer1_TabPanelLeasedAssets_RadioButtonList_Main_Lease
var radioButtonlist1 = document.getElementsByName("RadioButtonList_Main_Lease")
returns null
so I am using
radioButtonlist1= $get('<%=RadioButtonList_Main_Leased%>');
which returns the object but then following code doesnt work
if (radioButtonlist1[1].checked)
{
alert ('second radio selected');
}
how to get which radio is selected under the radio list when its nested
regards
Vijay
|
|
|
|
|
radioButtonlist1= $get('<%=RadioButtonList_Main_Leased.ClientId%>');
Did you try using the clientID?
I didn't get any requirements for the signature
|
|
|
|
|
I get by it but it doesnt even give length property on the returned object
|
|
|
|
|
Can you access the length property if it is not in a tab container?
I didn't get any requirements for the signature
|
|
|
|
|
on another form i have radio button list where I get the radio buttonlist object by using document.getelementbyid function and i can access checked or length properties
but since this one is nested inside ajax tab container and tab panel
i have to use get$ and i can not avail these properties.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi Everyone,
i having problem use the __doPostBack in conent page,i have fileuploader in my conent page,and im using a javascript for check the correct file format has select from the user,my javascript is
functon checkfile()
{
__doPostBack('linkbutton1','');
}
i use this script onchange event of my fileuploader,but this is not working,(im using linkbutton onclick event for serverside validation for give a message),can anyone help me to do this.
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
This is just a guess, but is it the id of the button. The id changes if it is in a content place holder. You will have to add the script from your server code and use LinkButton1.clientId.
I didn't get any requirements for the signature
|
|
|
|
|
Hi
Thanks for reply,i tried this before i post this problem to here,i put in my page load FileUpload1.Attributes.Add("onchange", "__doPostBack('<%= LinkButton4.ClientID %>', '');");
but still its not working,and also my linkbutton in the content palace holder.
|
|
|
|
|
if you use master page you must use UniqueID instead of ClientId in your cod
Example:
__doPostBack("<%= btnRefresh.UniqueID %>;",'');
or
var pr = Sys.WebForms.PageRequestManager.getInstance();
pr._doPostBack(<%= "'" + btnRefresh.UniqueID + "'" %>;, '');
|
|
|
|
|
I have a checkboxlist(created at design time, so its static) on my page and im loading data to it at runtime.
My problem is when ever there is no data to load the checkboxlist doesnt appear, does anyone know what property i should edit to make appear even if there nothing.
Note: im havent played around with the visible property, its always visible
|
|
|
|
|
Show here code how you load data in CheckBoxList.
I Love T-SQL
"Don't torture yourself,let the life to do it for you."
If my post helps you kindly save my time by voting my post.
|
|
|
|
|
If there is no data to populate the checkboxlist with, then it wont display, simply as that.
The gridview has a default control which allows you to put a message if no rows are found.
Maybe with the checkboxlist you could just put a label when no data is displayed.
The answers posted by me are suggestions only and cannot be used in anyway against me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all
I've had a look around and can't find any reference to this, which probably indicates that I'm stupid trying to do it, but here goes...
We've got an SEO consultant/master of the dark arts involved in one of our current projects and he's keen for the auto-generated __doPostBack to be in an include file rather than inline.
Has anyone got any ideas how to do this, or, indeed, if it's possible?
Thanks
Ben
|
|
|
|
|
So you want just the event postback to be an include file, why?
The answers posted by me are suggestions only and cannot be used in anyway against me.
|
|
|
|
|
I catch the scent of a consultant who doesn't have fricking clue what he's talking about...
|
|
|
|
|
Why...?
I didn't get any requirements for the signature
|
|
|
|
|
'Why' is a very good question....
The crux of his argument is that the cleaner the page (in his ideal world, the page would only be one css reference and H1 to H6 and P tags - obviously would not have functionality, but, hey, what does that matter), the better it will get indexed by the search engines - personally, I think this is a load of old horse sh!t, as I'm sure that Google have just about managed to figure out that it doesn't need to look inside script tags.
However, the business have engaged him to be involved in the project which means we either need to come up with reasons not to implement suggested changes, or find ways to do them.
If there's any easy way to do this, then I avoid a fight, if there isn't, and there's no value to it anyway, then I can go back to the business and suggest that most of what is being suggested has no value.
Oh, the joy of mixing politics with technology....
Thanks in advance!
Ben
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
