|
We have a NT service which listens to a TCP port. And we also have a client that connects to this TCP port for the service to perform some data processing and return the result.
So far, this service has worked perfectly. Except that when the service is with load balancing (Load balancing that comes with Win2K Adv Svr). When there is more than one service running in the load balance, the client generates a "Cannot connect to the server" error message. This does not happen when only one service is running (even in with load balancing).
Any idea of where to look to figure out what the problem might be?
Michel
It is a lovely language, but it takes a very long time to say anything in it, because we do not say anything in it, unless it is worth taking a very long time to say, and to listen to.
- TreeBeard
|
|
|
|
|
My firewall popped up a msg saying some remote system was trying to access this file. What is this thing?
PS. I'm running Win2K
"My brother says 'Hello'... So hurray for speech therapy!" -Emo Phillips
|
|
|
|
|
You might start here[^]. It seems to do rather a lot of different chores, though I also wonder why it thinks it needs to access the Internet, and why others are attempting to play with it.
"How many times do I have to flush before you go away?" - Megan Forbes, on Management (12/5/2002)
|
|
|
|
|
I have a client that has 7 Win2K Pro hosts connected as Peer-to-Peer, with 6 of them in use as data entry stations feeding the 7th host (I'll call it the Master, since it's not really a Server). Everything works fine, except for poor speed on two hosts (a cable problem, along with some minor config issues), so there's nothing really wrong. But while looking into it I noticed that from any data entry station it is possible to view all 6 such hosts, but the Master is not visible. From the Master, all 7 hosts are visible.
In every system I've seen or used if all hosts are configured properly, they all appear in My Network Places. Somehow, whoever it was that set this up managed to hide the Master from the rest, a slick trick in this case. I know it's not a foolproof security measure, but given the lack of computer skills of the data entry operators it is probably quite adequate. Monkey no-see, monkey no-do. How is this stunt accomplished? I can see a lot of practical uses for it in small office environments.
"How many times do I have to flush before you go away?" - Megan Forbes, on Management (12/5/2002)
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe the Master is not part of a domain.
Michel
It is a lovely language, but it takes a very long time to say anything in it, because we do not say anything in it, unless it is worth taking a very long time to say, and to listen to.
- TreeBeard
|
|
|
|
|
Michel Prévost wrote:
Maybe the Master is not part of a domain.
In a Peer-to-Peer network, there is no domain. But all 7 hosts are in the same Workgroup, including the one running the Master programs. All 6 data entry stations can "see" each other, but not the Master. Only the Master can display all 7 hosts, including itself, in My Network Places. A neat trick, if only I could figure out how they did it.
"How many times do I have to flush before you go away?" - Megan Forbes, on Management (12/5/2002)
|
|
|
|
|
I will ask the sysadmin at my work. They are quite at it. I'll get back to you if I have an answer.
|
|
|
|
|
Hai there!
i nead to create some stuff - hook, when user
do "Lock Computer", and then my program(in tray)
will do some actions, for example - get some URL. o smth else.
??
are there any examples?, or tutorials ??
thanks
PS: sory for my english.
----------------------------
never stop coding.
|
|
|
|
|
U mean ... like a cheat program???
I started with nothing,
And I still have lots of it left with me.
|
|
|
|
|
hm.. jep. but i am not going to do bad things...
just listen "Lock Computer/Unlock Computer" events, and
for example - write it to Database.
----------------------------
never stop coding.
|
|
|
|
|
U can get a lotsa things from http://www.astalavista.com...
I am not sure if u can get the source code... Sorry I cant help more on it...
I started with nothing,
And I still have lots of it left with me.
|
|
|
|
|
Do you mean record when these things happen ?
If so, it is called auditing and is handled by an adminstrative tool within te control panel.
Elaine
The tigress is here
|
|
|
|
|
no, just events, hook them, and do some action (with options : block, or not to block this windows message ).... mm ?
----------------------------
never stop coding.
|
|
|
|
|
We have a Win2K Pro laptop which has a file of size 1.99Mb is size. It is not an OS protected file, but when attempting to delete it the OS advises that it is already open. This even happens after a reboot. Does anyone have any suggestions as to what we can do to get rid of this damn file.
Andy
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe this is system file?
If this file located on NOT-system drive just start chkdsk from console with "Force dismount" option (/X). After check try to kill it.
|
|
|
|
|
Andy H wrote:
We have a Win2K Pro laptop which has a file of size 1.99Mb is size. It is not an OS protected file, but when attempting to delete it the OS advises that it is already open. This even happens after a reboot. Does anyone have any suggestions as to what we can do to get rid of this damn file.
You cab probably boot up into recovery console and delete it from there ...
Hope this helps .
It may be that this is a service file that is being used. In which case you can stop the service then delete the file .
Chris
|
|
|
|
|
hi all,
i want to change the defaut value of IE redirection..i.e. when a URL is not found IE is automatically redirected to autosearch.msn.com i want to redirect it to my own site..i.e..www.mysite.com..any help please...
thanks
himanshu
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't tried this, but you might give it a try. Search the Registry for the autosearch.msn.com URL and locate the keys where it appears (if any). After saving a backup copy of your registry, try changing the value of the keys found to www.mysite.com, then rebooting. IE is very consistent about following the Windows model, storing everything in the Registry instead of config files, so I'd expect this to work nicely. If not, you can at least restore everything from your backup.
"How many times do I have to flush before you go away?" - Megan Forbes, on Management (12/5/2002)
|
|
|
|
|
I'm very peckish to try SuSE Linux but I don't want to be away from my lovley Windows 2000. So I asking if it is possible to run SuSE and W2k on the same computer?
Rickard Andersson@Suza Computing
C# and C++ programmer from SWEDEN!
UIN: 50302279
E-Mail: nikado@pc.nu
Speciality: I love C#, ASP.NET and C++!
|
|
|
|
|
It is possible to run any Linux on the same machine as Win2k. Just use some boot manager.
|
|
|
|
|
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:
Just use some boot manager
Okay, my fiends who know this stuff more than me I think need to come over...
Rickard Andersson@Suza Computing
C# and C++ programmer from SWEDEN!
UIN: 50302279
E-Mail: nikado@pc.nu
Speciality: I love C#, ASP.NET and C++!
|
|
|
|
|
Rickard Andersson wrote:
who know this stuff
SuSE linux itself knows this... Am not joking..... but its true, it will take care for the boot-manager. Make sure u do the partition with care-that too suse linux helps in a good document.
All the best!
I started with nothing,
And I still have lots of it left with me.
|
|
|
|
|
hi
thats no problem. suse is a "easy" ditribution. suse gets notice pf you win partitions and even make mountpoints for it.
at home I have 2 hdd. one for win2k and one for suselinux 8.1
simply start with windows and then install suse..
but: if you want to have a "free data way" between win and suse make a win partition as FAT and not as NTFS... linux can read ntfs but not write..
but fat is no problem... read/write ok...
hope you are still alive (my english..)
) life is fun!
Johannes
//still a newbie
|
|
|
|
|
I know that thread dispatching is triggered when any thread enters the
Ready state. But do timers and I/O operations asynchronusly (i.e., outside
the 15 ms Interval Timer) change thread states (from
Waiting to Ready) and do they force the dispatcher to
immediately perform thread scheduling?
Given a high priority thread that is waiting on a timer to
expire (e.g., Sleep(1)), what mechanism is checking this
timer, does it occur at a higher frequency than the 15ms
Clock Interval Interrupt, and does it force immediate
thread scheduling?
|
|
|
|
|
jbenco wrote:
does it occur at a higher frequency than the 15ms
Clock Interval Interrupt
It may, but I don't believe so.
jbenco wrote:
and does it force immediate thread scheduling?
Definitely not.
W2K/XP are not real time operating systems nor are they deterministic when scheduling threads.
|
|
|
|