|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: However, I can make this a generic "CPOL.aspx" and have all versions be under CPOL1.01.aspx (etc) if that helps.
I think it would be great to maintain historic versions (even if the changes are minor). So every time you change the text in some way, you update at least the minor version number.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree. Maybe use the same "Revision Tab" used for articles?
|
|
|
|
|
On the member drop down the items are 'My Articles', 'My Messages' etc. however on the left hand member profile menu, these items are 'Articles Submitted' and 'Messages Posted'. should these not be the same, and preferably follow the 'My' convention.
In addition to this, if i visit my Member Profile, then the Rep Graph and click the FAQ link, followed by;
Messages Posted : Gives me a Latest messages page and a drop down to select a forum.
Articles Submitted : Gives me a blank page with header; "Articles by gunjan dokania ()"
Dave
Find Me On: Web| Facebook| Twitter| LinkedIn
CPRepWatcher now available as Packaged Chrome Extension, visit my articles for link.
modified on Saturday, October 16, 2010 12:14 PM
|
|
|
|
|
So, if you use cs as the language in your pre tag, the escape character doesn't escape double quotes.
By that I mean that if you write:
arrString[0] = arrString[0].Replace("\"",string.Empty);
or
string test = "something\"" + this + "\"something else"
it treats each double quote as starting or ending the current text section screwing up the coloring.
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks - I thought we had that licked but I've reopened that ticket.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
How feasible would it be to place a user limit on voting? As a real sledge hammer, you could restrict votes IN EITHER DIRECTION to 1 per 1,000 reps per day.
I'm somewhere around 28,000, so I earn 28 votes a day. That forces me to use them wisely and they become more meaningful.
CG can just go Librarian Poo, but I think it's a price worth paying.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
|
|
|
|
|
Excellent Suggestion.
The Weapon Guards Itself.
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
And only a % of those 28 votes could be used for down-votes. Possibly 1/4 or 1/3.
Chris Meech
I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar]
In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra]
|
|
|
|
|
That I don't know. Personally, I like the idea of having n votes per user that they can use any way they like.
Another site I used to faff around on had a similar system, but they restricted it that you couldn't vote on a thread you participated in. The idea being that if you psoted, you were involved and because you were involved any vote would be biased.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
|
|
|
|
|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: Another site I used to faff around on had a similar system, but they restricted it that you couldn't vote on a thread you participated in. The idea being that if you psoted, you were involved and because you were involved any vote would be biased.
Slashdot does that, but I don't think that's an option on CP. Just look at the programming forums... If you post a question there, and someone answers, you need to be able to give them a 5. In the lounge, it's pretty common to '5' a post and reply with a thumbs up. Speaking of which...
Nagy Vilmos wrote: Personally, I like the idea of having n votes per user that they can use any way they like.
|
|
|
|
|
Nagy Vilmos wrote: The idea being that if you psoted, you were involved and because you were involved any vote would be biased.
I don't think that reasonable. All that would do is perpetuate the insidious practice of anonymous univoting. Just because someone has sopted doesn't necessarily mean they will be biased. I often tops in threads that I have no feelings about at all. In fact I am more likely to ptos in threads of that kind.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
Henry Minute wrote: sopted ... tops ... ptos
Is there something about the word 'post' that upsets you, Henry?
Just say 'NO' to evaluated arguments for diadic functions! Ash
|
|
|
|
|
Simply gently, I hope, extracting the wee-wee from young William and his amazing dyslexic fingers.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
Henry Minute wrote: I don't think that reasonable. All that would do is perpetuate the insidious practice of anonymous univoting. Just because someone has sopted doesn't necessarily mean they will be biased. I often tops in threads that I have no feelings about at all. In fact I am more likely to ptos in threads of that kind.
Three different typos of the same word in one paragraph... That takes talent
|
|
|
|
|
See my response to Richard.
Henry Minute
Do not read medical books! You could die of a misprint. - Mark Twain
Girl: (staring) "Why do you need an icy cucumber?"
“I want to report a fraud. The government is lying to us all.”
|
|
|
|
|
I don't like this idea because the majority of readers are actually very low rep members. I don't see it as fair to disallow a new member the right to vote on something they really enjoy - what a buzz kill that is to try and award an author and have a "Sorry - you're not special enough" message come up.
Nagy Vilmos wrote: Librarian Poo
I wonder how many get the reference
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: I wonder how many get the reference
Ook?
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: what a buzz kill that is to try and award an author and have a "Sorry - you're not special enough" message come up.
That's an easy one to counter. Just don't show the voting option to users who can't vote. You can't miss what you dont know is there and is exactly how we handle the "edit" option elsewhere (ie, if you cant edit a question/answer you dont see the edit link - you dont see it and get a message "sorry you're not special enough to edit).
|
|
|
|
|
I'd certainly not be looking foward to all the "I see the article ratings but I can't see where to add my vote. What am I doing wrong?" messages.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: I wonder how many get the reference
Nobby says to say Hi, but old Stoneface ain't happy.
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't saying they can't vote, but some tactical block that thye can't vote 20+ oneses in an afternoon.
Panic, Chaos, Destruction.
My work here is done.
or "Drink. Get drunk. Fall over." - P O'H
|
|
|
|
|
That's a lot of number ones.
|
|
|
|
|
Don't get me wrong... is there a problem with univoters?
I am not an author, so I can only speak about the forums. Here I don't see a real problem, occasionally I wonder about a low vote but think it's just normal to have one idiot among a crowd. Overall it balances out, right?
|
|
|
|