|
|
|
why i am not getting any replyse[^]
In this answer, the member[^] who asked the question replied: Bull sh*t !!!!! No questions are foolish only answer can be ! this place is a hell of some mad fellows.
What should the action be?
[Edit:] While pointing finger to others for not answering questions, this guy has asked 63 questions, (and got a decent amount of answers), but haven't provided a proper answer for any questions. His only answer was a "thank you for your reply" comment, given as a solution for one of his own questions.
modified 23-Feb-12 22:18pm.
|
|
|
|
|
His account has been reported and closed.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you very much; I remember: the posts of this guy were quite irritating in general, before he started to freak out.
I must say that I saw cases which were even worse. Maybe I have to report some, too…
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Because he know the reason.Fact: If you insult Chuck Norris, when you wake up, oh wait.........you won't
Chuck Norris
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Chuck, I am not trying to insult you by sticking out my tongue. I'm merely showing that I think whatever you said is amusing.
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you for reporting this case. The posts of these guy were quite irritating in general. Good riddance.
I only have a little note on your argument. You should not blame anyone for not answering questions. It's perfectly OK if someone only asks questions and never answers. You cannot expect it from someone who rather needs help. Not trying to answer is only a good thing for most members. I think you would agree with that.
Thank you,
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
Good point.
I think I freaked out too... because he freaked out.
|
|
|
|
|
No, you were perfectly correct in general; that was just a little logical incorrectness I noted on. Not falling into the flame war, it is important to oppose what you think is wrong, and it's important to do it in a logically correct way. You post was absolutely natural and fully reasonable.
Your complain was a useful precedent (did you do it before?); it's good to expel the members with such attitudes, ignorance and impudence.
I don't think the problem is personal offense of something like that. It happens. The problem is the systematic contamination of the Web space of the site, setting a bad model for other members, distracting attention from decent members who really need help, can use it well and hence deserve our help.
After all, the problem is the damage to the prestige of the site and ultimately, lowering of the value of our activity.
Honestly, I faced even worse cases but hesitated to report them here as they were not explicit commercial spam.
—SASergey A Kryukov
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not anymore
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I feel stupid reporting this member[^] (and I use the word member advisedly) as he spammed here[^], surely the one place it is going to get picked up
|
|
|
|
|
The other likely place to be picked up is in this forum.
|
|
|
|
|
It made me when I stumbled across it.
Unrequited desire is character building. OriginalGriff
I'm sitting here giving you a standing ovation - Len Goodman
|
|
|
|
|
|
Done.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
bjland -> 4 days at the temple of heaven.
Sorry, but that is funnier than most of the jokes in the soapbox.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
I had missed that.
I guess I must be getting old...
Ideological Purity is no substitute for being able to stick your thumb down a pipe to stop the water
|
|
|
|
|
|
|