|
|
|
Those aren't spam - but they are abuse.
Spam is advertising that isn't paid for - unsolicited and intended only to drive traffic to a site, or get sales. Those comments aren't that. But ye, they are abuse - they are just rubbish, and there are enough of them to serious warrant an abuse vote. Unfortunately, I can't give one - because the account is dead!
In future though, try to link to a page rather than take a snapshot and post a link to that - it's easier to read, and we can check it / follow it up a lot more efficiently.
Well done!
This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.
|
|
|
|
|
Quote: try to link to a page rather than take a snapshot and post a link to that
Well,i was not sure whether that page will be available for viewing or not if he deletes accounts by seeing this message,so my intention was to make that thing alive through snapshots.
But,its good that,though that account is not active,link to those comments is still alive.
Thanks.
Rule of debugging: "If you get a different error message, you're making progress."
|
|
|
|
|
Not via the account page, but it can be accessed from a link. But if the account is gone, it doesn't matter that you have a screenshot to show why - we can't follow the links to "tidy up" the messages from an image because they do not include the URL anyway!
This message is manufactured from fully recyclable noughts and ones. To recycle this message, please separate into two tidy piles, and take them to your nearest local recycling centre.
Please note that in some areas noughts are always replaced with zeros by law, and many facilities cannot recycle zeroes - in this case, please bury them in your back garden and water frequently.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article gone, user needs one more
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article gone, user needs one more
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
New member[^] to promote web site[^]
Reality is an illusion caused by a lack of alcohol
"Nagy, you have won the internets." - Keith Barrow
modified 26-Aug-13 11:02am.
|
|
|
|
|
Gone
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SoMad wrote: Member: Live Stream[^]
Well, at least he says he is a live stream spammer.
brisingr_aerowing@Gryphon-PC $ rake in_the_dough
Raking in the dough
brisingr_aerowing@Gryphon-PC $ make lots_of_money
Making lots_of_money
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now they are both gone.
0100000101101110011001000111001011101001
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks. I kept checking, but that second one just wouldn't die.
Soren Madsen
"When you don't know what you're doing it's best to do it quickly" - Jase #DuckDynasty
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think the hamsters should have a look, just in case of old rep-bugs coming back or something like that. But I don't think the user is to be reported.
On the other side... if the 60k were in Author... ok. But such a jump in organiser... is more difficult
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is. I just found it odd that you've only posted 1 answer in August, but you have been on the Top Experts for the past few days.
I wasn't, now I am, then I won't be anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Yes I can see that. Maybe this rank is done based on recent votes, so probably I got recent votes on my old answers (I just answered a new question right now...).
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe it was a problem with the score update, because I just checked and I am not leading
0 Sergey Alexandrovich Kryukov 724
1 Michael Haephrati 470
|
|
|
|
|