|
Just DROP it please.
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like to JOIN this discussion.
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
Well, you have the honor to SELECT a topic
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani
|
|
|
|
|
I chimed in only because I LIKE it.
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
Please, TRUNCATE TABLE talk.
|
|
|
|
|
Why did you INSERT yourself? DESCRIBE.
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani
|
|
|
|
|
Do you have the AUTHORIZATION to ask him that?
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
I motion for a renaming of the site.
|
|
|
|
|
Because I'm old and saw a gray hair today.
Plucked the F#$%er.
|
|
|
|
|
Good old-fashioned C for me, too. I haven't coded in C for a good few years but I still regard it as my first language. It has an elegance that modern languages just don't have.
I'm lucky to find a brown hair these days, so maybe age is a big factor in this poll.
|
|
|
|
|
C for me too - even if it's the just language I use to unwind after a hard day of Object Orientated functions and procedures <-- I really wish I was joking, but that's just this week.
To contrast with the both of you - I'm pretty sure I'm the only person born in the 90s who understands C.
|
|
|
|
|
Only because I'm born in 1988.
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani
|
|
|
|
|
Same.
I miss the simplicity of just C.
I still do my pseudo code in C.
And i had to stop plucking the grey hairs to avoid baldness (and why is it ONE eyebrow that
is much more grey than the other?)
|
|
|
|
|
I had a professor who kept plucking grey hairs to avoid baldness, but it was too late. All the hair he had was grey.
"Real men drive manual transmission" - Rajesh.
|
|
|
|
|
Seriously? Just because it has "C" in its name?
I vote for COBOL then. At least it starts with C.
|
|
|
|
|
Not sure what you mean here. Objective C is a super-set of C and therefore more "C-style" than any other language on the list except C itself.
|
|
|
|
|
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote: Objective C is a super-set of C and therefore more "C-style" than any other language on the list except C itself.
I guess the survey really means "C-style syntax."
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
I have to agree with Nemanja here!
The Objective-C Compiler will happily compile .c file inside the same project and link to C libs as well as ObjectiveC lib in the same executable. IT can hardly be more C than that!
|
|
|
|
|
I agree in this case. I was just trying to make a general point, as obviously some of the other languages listed are clearly very different from C but use C-syntax.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Haha, I have to agree that the syntax looks alien!
Just wanted to defend it!
Use to love it in 1998!
|
|
|
|
|
Super Lloyd wrote: Haha, I have to agree that the syntax looks alien!
I agree, and my brief experience of Objective C was that it was awful. Swift is much nicer just from no more than a glance at it!
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
Oh don't mind me, I was just exaggerating because the weird syntax and the weird IDE (== different from what I usually use) had me annoyed a bit.
|
|
|
|
|
I'd rather be using something like Rust[^], but as no-one is paying me to do that, C++ it is.
And for the record, C# is pretty much Visual Basic with some curly braces and semicolons randomly sprinkled around
|
|
|
|
|
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote: And for the record, C# is pretty much Visual Basic with some curly braces and semicolons randomly sprinkled around My thoughts, really!
GCS d--- s-/++ a- C++++ U+++ P- L- E-- W++ N++ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE- Y+ PGP t++ 5? X R++ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++>+++ h--- ++>+++ y+++* Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X
If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP. -- TNCaver
When I was six, there were no ones and zeroes - only zeroes. And not all of them worked. -- Ravi Bhavnani
|
|
|
|
|
So what is your least disliked C-style language then?
From what I can see from various posts only Rust looks like the most worthy competitor to C++.
Kevin
|
|
|
|