|
And sorry for the "arrogance" again, you triggerd me something
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
0x01AA wrote: And sorry for the "arrogance" again, you triggerd me something Thank you for that. It's OK.
Have a nice evening
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Have a nice evening too. Hoping I can adapt me to have have more constructive discussions with you.
[Edit]
This for EOD on my part (and the doh is not for you but more for me)
It does not solve my Problem, but it answers my question
modified 19-Jan-21 21:04pm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We all care about the site, if not, we wouldn't be investing our private time to keep it clean as we do. I respect you a lot as a professional and I think that your technical knowledge is far beyond mine. I think you know how many time CP Staff invested / still invest with the spam filters and I suppose too, that you understand the logic behind it, how it works and how difficult it is to keep them accurated.
And exactly because of that, it even is more difficult for me to understand, why is so important to use the word spam even when it is clear that it isn't?
There are more options to click that come to the same end and don't affect the other processes... why do you block that hard, when I ask you to consider / use them?
Of course, I can't force you to anything and it is not my intention. I just find it sad, to increase the noise for the filters being totally unnecessary, at the end is more work for all of us.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Well I am sorry that it upsets you so much, but we all make mistakes from time to time.
|
|
|
|
|
Richard MacCutchan wrote: Well I am sorry that it upsets you so much, It doesn't upset me at all.
And I think you missunderstand my intention. I don't want to point you like "you fool" or whatever. I only try to spare additional "work" for all of us and spare some users to get caught by the filters as wrong positives.
Richard MacCutchan wrote: but we all make mistakes from time to time. I know, I am far away from perfection and make them too.
I have lost the count on how many times I have had to apologize due to my wrong reports or because I missunderstood things.
No worries, I am stopping here. I think you can understand what I mean and if not, it is because you don't want to, either way it is needles to repeat it anymore.
As I said before, I respect you and I know that you do a lot of good for the site.
Sorry if I bothered you, have a nice weekend
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Nelek wrote: Sorry if I bothered you, have a nice weekend Not at all, your points were all well made and valid. Have a good weekend yourself, and above all, keep safe.
|
|
|
|
|
I voted for extremely poor quality on this one, as required documentation is practically inexistant.
"Five fruits and vegetables a day? What a joke!
Personally, after the third watermelon, I'm full."
|
|
|
|
|
And that's exactly the correct option.
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
Dynamic SQL going crazy!![^]
Kanishka Basak - Professional Profile[^]
The intro section is copy'n'paste'n'tweak from somewhere - exactly where I'm not sure, it appears all over the place. But this has a heck of a lot of it in one lump: SQL Server Dynamic SQL[^] though I doubt that's the actual source.
Compare the CP version:
Quote: Dynamic SQL is basically a programming technique that enables you to build SQL statements dynamically at run time. It allows you to create more general purpose flexible SQL statement because the full text of the SQL statements may be unknown at compilation. For example, you can use Dynamic SQL to create a stored procedure that queries data against a table whose name is not known until run time.
And the "original":
Quote: Dynamic SQL is a programming technique that allows you to construct SQL statements dynamically at runtime. It allows you to create more general purpose and flexible SQL statement because the full text of the SQL statements may be unknown at compilation. For example, you can use the dynamic SQL to create a stored procedure that queries data against a table whose name is not known until runtime.
It's even got the original grammar errors left in ...
"I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony
AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!
modified 24-Apr-20 8:08am.
|
|
|
|
|
Not anymore... Deeksha got her hands over it... pity the invested time beautifying a plagium
M.D.V.
If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?
Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you
Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
|
|
|
|
|
.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment
"Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst
"I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
|
|
|
|
|