|
I have a program that runs as a service. It needs to run a program under another user's account. The service will have access to a username/password. The service, of course, is running under the System account.
I have investigated CreateProcessAsUser, but for the life of me I cannot get it to work as expected! I can use LogonUser to get a token, and then pass it to CreateProcessAsUser, which dutifully runs the program and returns no errors, but from all observations, the program does not seem to run under the right account.
Any ideas? I'd post code, but it is pretty bulky. I got it from an article here on CP about a Telnet server. OR just to test, is there a relatively easy way I could, say, print the name of the user I'm running the code as, or some other sure-fire test?
This service may be running with or without the given user logged on, so I'm not sure if that makes a difference.
Thanks.
"I'd be up a piece if I hadn't swallowed my bishop." Mr. Ed, playing chess
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe this is at a tangent to what you're asking ...
What privileges does your service have ?? - My security handbooks are at home, but I would have thought to be able to do this you would need higher privileges than a standard account (or the local system account) ..
'G'
|
|
|
|
|
It would seem odd to need higher priveleges than the standard System account... doesn't that have pretty much everything? 
And then who'd be able to set the system account privileges? Granted, I wouldn't be surprised if this were the case... although that would pretty much sink any hopes I'd have of implementhing this idea.
"I'd be up a piece if I hadn't swallowed my bishop." Mr. Ed, playing chess
|
|
|
|
|
AFAIK, CreateProcessAsUser and LogonUser need the following four privileges: SeIncreaseQuotaPrivilege, SeAssignPrimaryTokenPrivilege, SeChangeNotifyPrivilege, and SeTcbPrivilege
Im just looking for some articles that may help you ...
'G'
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for your info. I'd rather be flooded with info than have no info at all. 
"I'd be up a piece if I hadn't swallowed my bishop." Mr. Ed, playing chess
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all
I wrote a large MFC application and recently began to convert it to .NET framework. I do this step-by-step by rewriting some parts and components written in MFC into C#. Now I have application written in MFC with a lot of C# components talking between them using com-interop.
But now i want to perform some serious testing. I've tried some available products such as Rational Quantify and DevPartner and all of them had problem to handle with my app because it written both in MFC and C#.
What is the best way to test such app (CPU, memory etc.)?
Can anybody recomend me about some other monitoring product?
thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
i honestly dont know anything that does that. but let me tell you sth. about c#.
the 2 languages C & VB are just fine. VB is for kids or persons who just don't need more than a window with buttons and images in their lifes;C is a lower-level language, the coolest i know about. but the microsoft morons decided to rise the VB level for the VB community to have pointers and stuff and to lower the C's level, nobody knows why. why, my friend are you sinking to c#?
kill bill!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all!
In my application I'm using mnemonics for the control buttons but when I run it, they don't appear until I press Alt key. Could I see'em when I run the application and don't press the key anyway?
Thank you in advance!
I have no idea
|
|
|
|
|
That's a feature of the OS. You can turn it off in the Display properties (the exact location varies among OSes), it's called "Hide keyboard navigation until I press the Alt key" or something similar.
--Mike--
Ericahist | CP SearchBar v2.0.2 | Homepage | 1ClickPicGrabber New v2.0.1! | RightClick-Encrypt
"Linux is good. It can do no wrong. It is open source so must be right. It has penguins. I want to eat your brain."
-- Paul Watson, Linux Zombie
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you!! I was going nuts!
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I have a MDI application with 2 document types and I am using DundasSoftware's Tabbed View control.
On startup of my application I open 2 documents one is of CListView and the other is a CHtmlView. I force both views to Maximize (this way the user has to use the tab's to go between views/documents).
My question is, I only want the "x" (close button) on the child frame to be shown. I don't want the user to have the option to minimize or restore down the view/document.
I have tried OnPreCreateWindow to remove the MinimizeBox and Maximize box.. this works except it still shows the "RestoreDown" box... any Ideas??
Thanks!!!
Rob
Whoever said nothing's impossible never tried slamming a revolving door!
|
|
|
|
|
Rob,
What you are getting is the standard behavior of CMDIFrameWnd. I suggest you remove the WS_SYSMENU style from CChildFrame::PreCreateWindow():
cs.style &= ~WS_SYSMENU;
You will have no buttons and no system menu. If you still want to be able to close a view you must provide another approach (maybe a toolbar button).
Ivor S. Sargoytchev
Dundas Software
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah thats what I figured.. I was just hoping someone had a secret
Thanks, That's what I'll have to do.
Rob
Whoever said nothing's impossible never tried slamming a revolving door!
|
|
|
|
|
Hi everyone!
Is it possible to write different lines in a multiline Edit Box without pressing CTRL key + Enter anyway? I mean, could I write different lines only pressing Enter key?
Thank you in advance!
I have no idea
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, just use the ES_WANTRETURN style.
A rich person is not the one who has the most, but the one that needs the least.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm trying to find how to use it, but I'm not lucky today
Could you show me an example for this command or tell me an URL where I could find it?
Thank you for your help
I have no idea
|
|
|
|
|
http://search.microsoft.com/search/results.aspx?View=msdn&st=a&qu=es_multiline&c=4&s=2
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=es_multiline&btnG=Google+Search
A rich person is not the one who has the most, but the one that needs the least.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Edit Box dialog means right click and open properties dialog box. in that styles tab is there, here want return check box click and enable it enough.
Have A Nice Day!
Murali.M
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you... I was looking Dialog Properties and not Edit Properties so I couldn't find it (At least I realised  )
I'll leave my head back someday!!
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I would like to know, if anyone has a good source of information (with examples) about plugin framework. I would like to build application which will be driven by plugins, and most of the code will be outside the main executable. I would like this code to extend/modify visually the main program and as functionality also. I can't find any good sources about this :/ This is really urgent, please help me,
Thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
|
I dont wish to be rude, but have you looked around CodeProject much ??
Len Holgate has this article http://www.codeproject.com/com/extensibleapps.asp[^] That Zac Howland has turned into a couple of articles - the first being http://www.codeproject.com/com/componentcategories.asp[^] ... these are all in the COM section on Codeproject (use the section navigation options on the left hand frame...) ..then, if you want to look at 'dll' as opposed to the COM way of doing plugins, there are a number of articles under the "DLL's" section.
Its really not that hard to find some info on what you're looking for - you just have to have some get up and go and not expect everything to be handed to you on a plate...sigh, the youth of today
'G'
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the reply,
No, I don't want somebody else to handle my project, that's why I asked for information on some kind of framework. I've looked over the dll's secton a long time ago, and I know about the 2 examples present there. I was trying to get as far as possible from COM 
Thanks again 
|
|
|
|
|
OK you dont want COM - in which case the 'framework' is 'whatever you want it to be'
The only other working instance of a plugin DLL 'framework' I know of is :-
http://csl.sourceforge.net/[^]
Its well documented and worth taking a look at..
I think wether you are using COM or not, to a certain extent you still have the same issues, but they are made easier or harder by your choice of implementation base - to some extent with DLL you have to be a bit more rigid in that every dll has the same functions with the same parameters unless you set up some sort or registration interface (isnt that COM ???) .. In COM, you can hide that and check the Component Category registry or query IUnknown to see if a particular interface is supported ...
'G'
|
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
