|
I once had a lot of SPAN tags in an article, the wizard ate them all. Chris is checking all HTML tags he gets, and doesn't like most of them. OTOH some of them are considered OK, as is described here[^].
|
|
|
|
|
That's perfectly fine if it takes out the SPAN tags when it renders the HTML (though, actually, I like my SPANs... don't take them from me!). However, it should not modify the original message so that it is different when I go back in to edit it. Also, the behavior is inconsistent. The first time I post the message, the SPAN stays. If I then edit the message, that is when it disappears (if I were to post that edit, the SPAN would be missing from the rendered HTML too).
|
|
|
|
|
Found and fixed the issue. Upload soon.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spam trap. Removed - thanks
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Are you guys aware that the right-arrows indicating sub menus aren't positioned correctly?
Using IE7 of Vista (and it's the same on FireFox).
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
I know there's an issue with IE7, but not with FireFox. You've Ctrl+F5 on FF? The CSS update was weeks ago so it should have come through by now, but just in case...
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
I can replicate on IE8, the > merges into the end of the text on:
Application Lifecycle
C/C++/MFC
IT & Infrastructure
Web Development
Edit: Only with compatability mode ON
DaveIf this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier.
Please take your VB.NET out of our nice case sensitive forum.(Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
|
|
|
|
|
Are you in compatibility mode?
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I edited above.
Just tested on FF 3.6.8 and all OK for me.
DaveIf this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier.
Please take your VB.NET out of our nice case sensitive forum.(Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
|
|
|
|
|
I can see it too, with IE7. The remarkable thing is "Other Languages" is fine.
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps a CSS issue then as that has a different style applied to it?
DaveIf this helped, please vote & accept answer!
Binging is like googling, it just feels dirtier.
Please take your VB.NET out of our nice case sensitive forum.(Pete O'Hanlon)
BTW, in software, hope and pray is not a viable strategy. (Luc Pattyn)
|
|
|
|
|
DaveyM69 wrote: Perhaps a CSS issue
I think so. And probably one that can be solved easily.
|
|
|
|
|
For the non-heading entries the difference is that there are CSS rules not being applied. I've been playing around and have an interim (read: dodgy, but better than nothing and I have bigger fish to fry) solution.
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
1. Author should have knowledge of who has bookmarked the article.
2. Author should have knowledge of who has voted for the article.
Thanks,
|
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately this is overridden by
1. Those who bookmark should be able to do so privately
2. Those who vote should be able to do so privately
cheers,
Chris Maunder
The Code Project | Co-founder
Microsoft C++ MVP
|
|
|
|
|
hmm. its clash Now,
To whom to believe Author or Audiance ??
Anyway i needed those two things so i asked,
I Know codeproject know better then me.
But I think It is not any confidential thing that one should hide,
|
|
|
|
|
You're spittin' in the wind Kee-moe-sobbie...
Knowing who bookmarked your article is simply pointless, and knowing who voted your article isn't gonna happen because the admins are concerned (and rightfully so) that revenge voting will take place.
Find another cause, because you're not gonna win either of these arguments.
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Maunder wrote: 2. Those who vote should be able to do so privately
I am not sure why the OP even had to ask this. 1,2, and 3 votes cannot be cast anonymously anyway. And why does he need to know 4 and 5 voters? Most 4 and 5 voters leave comments anyway indicating their vote.
|
|
|
|
|
Hiren Solanki wrote: 2. Author should have knowledge of who has voted for the article.
Why? Revenge voting?
Hiren Solanki wrote: 1. Author should have knowledge of who has bookmarked the article.
Again, why? What purpose would knowing that Member 123456 bookmarked your article serve?
|
|
|
|
|
Because Member 123456 is a satirical git who deserves a few down votes for his smart-arsyness? 
------------------------------------
I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave
CCC League Table Link
CCC Link[ ^]
|
|
|
|
|
You are true if you think like that,
But my thinking is different.
I want to know Voters Because Vote of Some MVP,Admins,SiteBuilders are more important then voters who are newbies to CodeProject.
Vote of MVP,Admins,SiteBuilders are important to me, so i want to know that if that person Liked the article.?
And I will not argue about who is bookmarking the article,Just leave that matter.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Hiren Solanki wrote: I want to know Voters Because Vote of Some MVP,Admins,SiteBuilders are more important then voters who are newbies to CodeProject
Why? Just because somebody hasn't been a member of CP for a long time doesn't make their opinion any less worthy. All you will do is scare off voters.
|
|
|
|
|
If that's all you want then individual user data isn't needed. CP weights votes based on membership levels so in theory a more detailed breakout showing votes tallies for each membertype could be provided.
Revenge voting *IS* a major problem though so data that would facilitate it will *NOT* be provided.
3x12=36
2x12=24
1x12=12
0x12=18
|
|
|
|
|
Votes are weighted according to the user's status on the site, which itself s based on how they participate. People with higher reputation scores are going to be counted more that people with low reputation scores. For instance, my reputation is higher than the sdite admin's reputation, so my vote actually counts more, and I'm not even a MVP this year.
(Neener, neener, Chris)
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001
|
|
|
|
General 
News 
Suggestion 
Question 
Bug 
Answer 
Joke 
Praise 
Rant 
Admin 
Submit an article or tip
