|
leckey wrote: I am a bit cranky tonight!
I noticed (and I'll duck when it gets more than a bit).
Maybe you could try and be somewhat more tolerant towards the neophytes. Temper won't help them.
If it really looks too bad I try and stay calm and advise them to buy and study a book, rather than ask
questions in all directions. Or I just skip the thread...
|
|
|
|
|
I try to skip these threads, but when they are part of the deluge of idiots...it becomes very, very, difficult for me!
Then there are the times others are mocking and I just want to get in on the action!
"Well, we're getting "F"'d at work. WPF, WCF, and WWF... WTF?" --John Simmons
|
|
|
|
|
Seems like all the action is yours right now...
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not trying to steal the stage.
Except in SB right now!
"Well, we're getting "F"'d at work. WPF, WCF, and WWF... WTF?" --John Simmons
|
|
|
|
|
leckey wrote: Except in SB
I never visit, seems like idiots united and lots of name calling.
And half of the words there didn't make it to my dictionary...
|
|
|
|
|
I haven't posted there in ages but there was a rant about Ilion/Idiot so I started a thread on why we should ignore him like we did with "he who must not be named" in the Lounge several months back. I agree that most of the posts are stupid or about global warming; once in awhile I post a link there that I would like to hear feedback about (besides this last one about Idiot it was about the US Army sending some "general" letters) the subject and it's not appropriate for the Lounge.
BTW, congrats on another year of MVP for you!
"Well, we're getting "F"'d at work. WPF, WCF, and WWF... WTF?" --John Simmons
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks, and congrats to you too.
leckey wrote: a thread on why we should ignore him
That is an oxymoron, isn't it?
Same as when you reply with a message holding an "ignore this thread" subject line, immediately lots of messages get added. Seems to me the only way to ignore something is to do nothing at all on the subject.
|
|
|
|
|
I agree, but even with "him who must be not named" it took a lot of threads started to get to the final point.
"Well, we're getting "F"'d at work. WPF, WCF, and WWF... WTF?" --John Simmons
|
|
|
|
|
Can anybody tell me whether the any version of .NET framework is part of any windows OS just like Windows explorer is part of Windows Xp and other versions ??
Thanks in advance
Dattatraya
|
|
|
|
|
.Net framework is not part of any windows OS.Its independent framework can be installed on any MS windows OS.There might be some compatiblity issues from the older versions but not directly related to OS.
Cheers!!
Brij
|
|
|
|
|
Wrong. The framework 2.0 is incorporated into Vista and Server 2008 and above. Windows7 also has 3.5 I believe
only two letters away from being an asset
|
|
|
|
|
Slightly wrong still, Vista has .NET 3.0 installed because it is part of the Windows Presentation Foundation which was a fundamental aspect of Vista's marketing.
Regards,
Thomas Stockwell
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.
Visit my Blog
|
|
|
|
|
.NET framework comes preinstalled with Vista.
The .NET framework is a runtime library, it's not part of the OS itself, and neither the OS or any of it's cruical applications does depend on it. Some accessories or games that comes with the OS might depend on it.
Despite everything, the person most likely to be fooling you next is yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
hi....
actually am doing a simple application using
" WCF Service Application " & " ASP.NET Web Application "..........
my code is correct and everything is perfect..
but when i run, it displays the following message....
" An operation on a socket could not be performed because the system lacked sufficient buffer space or because a queue "
when i run in the morning the output is displayed..but after sometime , when i run it shows that message.....
whats the solution...??...
|
|
|
|
|
Are you trying to irritate people by spamming the forums with the same question asked repeatedly? It is considered rude you know.
|
|
|
|
|
...
"Well, we're getting "F"'d at work. WPF, WCF, and WWF... WTF?" --John Simmons
|
|
|
|
|
how to save the replace the existing file?
|
|
|
|
|
What existing file? And replace it with what?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
I suggest you use File.Move to rename the existing file.
PS: great subject line, it really warns us for the message content.
|
|
|
|
|
|
vid1985 wrote: hi
Hola.
Mark Salsbery
Microsoft MVP - Visual C++
|
|
|
|
|
You're Spanish then? or an Angel[^]?
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
My Web Service application make a EventLog entry with ID 10016 in case I not give the Network Service DCOM Lunch Permissions for netman.
This is ok I can set the permissions by using dcomcnfg. But I do not want to do this for all installations by hand. So is there any way to set this permission programmatically.
Thanks
-- Daniel
|
|
|
|
|
Dear Friends,
I will show Image from Mssql server 2005 into crystal report by vbdotnet dynamically,give ideas for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello,
I have an Application Where in The Code Reads from a File present in Application Directory.
Now if the file is not present, then the code displays the message that File Not Found along with the Full File Path.
This is what i don't want, I need only to display File Not Found and not the file path.
Could anyone please tell me how can i check what kind of Exception has occured in the catch block and display my own messages as per the exception.
Hope I have explained my problem properly,
Thanks in Advance.
|
|
|
|